• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Do phenolic intake manifold spacers work? What do they do?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juiced_94gt
  • Start date Start date Nov 3, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

juiced_94gt

Active Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,143
0
36
Southern California
Nov 3, 2005
#1
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #1
Are there any REAL gains from adding a 1" spacer to the intake manifold? or should i just install the cobra manifold without one? Do they really make power?
Thanks in advance-Mario
 

greenlantern

Member
Jul 11, 2004
265
1
17
St Louis Mo
Nov 3, 2005
#2
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #2
Honestly I put one on because I needed the clearence for the taller valve covers I had. I know that increasing the runner is supposed to make power but I couldn't tell the difference.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 3, 2005
#3
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #3
Most people (myself included) do it to clear taller valve covers. I put a 3/8" on mine. FWIW, I think longer runners = more hp, shorter runners = more torque, I think.
 
M

mackey

Active Member
Jan 25, 2003
1,284
1
38
Beverly, Massachusetts
Nov 3, 2005
#4
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #4
It DEFINITELY cools down the upper intake temperature which is good.
 
9

95cobradude

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
194
0
0
long island, ny
Nov 3, 2005
#5
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #5
juiced, i have a cobra upper and lower manifold for sale from my 95. the upper was extrude honed and the lower hand ported. i have all the bolts, gasket, egr valve, etc.
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Nov 3, 2005
#6
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #6
CManT1914 said:
Most people (myself included) do it to clear taller valve covers. I put a 3/8" on mine. FWIW, I think longer runners = more hp, shorter runners = more torque, I think.
Click to expand...

Other way around, more runner length equals more low-end torque, less runner length equals higher horsepower peak. With all else being equal. Just look at the intake runner on a tractor, its long. Compare the Vic 5.0 to the Performer.

My 3/8" phenolic spacer kept the upper intake "cooler" for a longer period of time. But after driving for 30 minutes the upper intake is the same temp that it was before I put the spacer on.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 3, 2005
#7
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #7
zenboy99 said:
Other way around, more runner length equals more low-end torque, less runner length equals higher horsepower peak. With all else being equal. Just look at the intake runner on a tractor, its long. Compare the Vic 5.0 to the Performer.
Click to expand...

Ah! Thanks for clearing that up, I couldn't remember which way it was. Makes sense now, that Vic intake has like NO runner length, lol.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Nov 3, 2005
#8
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #8
Quick question for you guys w/the intake spacer: Does the 3/8 spacer cause any problem the egr connection from the passenger-side header? Any clearance issues with the stock hood/hood blanket?
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 3, 2005
#9
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #9
Scott_95GT said:
Quick question for you guys w/the intake spacer: Does the 3/8 spacer cause any problem the egr connection from the passenger-side header? Any clearance issues with the stock hood/hood blanket?
Click to expand...

I have the cobra intake with a 3/8" spacer. I have no clearance issues, although I have the hood blanket removed. But a few guys I know with the hood blanket still on and a spacer have no problems either. My EGR wouldn't fit back on my intake, so I took it off.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Nov 3, 2005
#10
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #10
CManT1914 said:
I have the cobra intake with a 3/8" spacer. I have no clearance issues, although I have the hood blanket removed. But a few guys I know with the hood blanket still on and a spacer have no problems either. My EGR wouldn't fit back on my intake, so I took it off.
Click to expand...

Why wouldn't your egr fit back on your intake? Do you have a 94-95 cobra intake?
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 3, 2005
#11
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #11
Scott_95GT said:
Why wouldn't your egr fit back on your intake? Do you have a 94-95 cobra intake?
Click to expand...

Yea, 94/95. It might have fit if I messed with it more, but I accidentally snapped it trying to bend it a little bit, lol.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Nov 3, 2005
#12
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #12
CManT1914 said:
Yea, 94/95. It might have fit if I messed with it more, but I accidentally snapped it trying to bend it a little bit, lol.
Click to expand...

Thats cool. I just want to eliminate any possible bumps in the road as far as installation in concerned. I felt like getting rid of my egr after connecting that stupid egr tube that came with my BBK headers.

My egr has a low self esteem after all the verbal abuse I gave it when i put my headers on.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 3, 2005
#13
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #13
Scott_95GT said:
My egr has a low self esteem after all the verbal abuse I gave it when i put my headers on.
Click to expand...

Make sure if you do delete the EGR, that you can tune it out of the computer somehow. That push the plunger halfway down thing doesn't work as good as people say, lol.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Nov 3, 2005
#14
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #14
CManT1914 said:
Make sure if you do delete the EGR, that you can tune it out of the computer somehow. That push the plunger halfway down thing doesn't work as good as people say, lol.
Click to expand...

I guess not, lol. I want to delete the EGR and cap the header so bad, but it will be a PITA when I have to smog it.
 
9

95cobradude

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
194
0
0
long island, ny
Nov 3, 2005
#15
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #15
deleting the egr is the way to go. i capped the header, made a block off plate to bolt to the manifold in place of the egr, and the chip tells the computer that there is no egr valve. much cleaner look under the hood.
 

BlueOvalStangGT

Active Member
Oct 27, 2003
2,849
0
46
Tampa Florida....USF!!!
Nov 3, 2005
#16
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #16
I needed mine to clear my fox valve covers, egr and hood clearance isnt an issue for me thanks to the cobra r hood and no EGR.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Nov 3, 2005
#17
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #17
Scott_95GT said:
I guess not, lol. I want to delete the EGR and cap the header so bad, but it will be a PITA when I have to smog it.
Click to expand...

Why do you want to delete the EGR? It's a win-win system when it's working properly. Added gas mileage, and no power loss as it's ignored at idle and under WOT.
 

Scott_95GT

New Member
Oct 8, 2004
387
0
0
Sacramento
Nov 3, 2005
#18
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #18
CManT1914 said:
Why do you want to delete the EGR? It's a win-win system when it's working properly. Added gas mileage, and no power loss as it's ignored at idle and under WOT.
Click to expand...

I like the look under the hood with no egr, and it's just easier to work on the car with out all that crap in the way.
 

urban96

bubb rubb says:"woo woooooo"
Founding Member
Sep 24, 2002
3,464
1
69
Syracuse, NY
Nov 3, 2005
#19
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #19
i have a 3/8 spacer on my cobra and fits just fine under the stock hood w/blanket

im only using it to clear fox VC's
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Nov 3, 2005
#20
  • Nov 3, 2005
  • #20
CManT1914 said:
Why do you want to delete the EGR? It's a win-win system when it's working properly. Added gas mileage, and no power loss as it's ignored at idle and under WOT.
Click to expand...




:Word: what he said
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Broken lower intake bolts
  • Mike3
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
709
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
209
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
397
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
F
Fox 1990 Mustang GT 5.0 A9L – Engine suddenly shuts off but immediately restarts when key turned
  • FishermansFriend
  • Aug 9, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
445
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2026
General karthief
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
339
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?