• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Does anyone have a 19:1 Steering box?

  • Thread starter Thread starter XXBULLETSXX
  • Start date Start date May 9, 2005

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
May 9, 2005
#1
  • May 9, 2005
  • #1
I was thinking of getting a Flaming River steering box with a 19:1 ratio instead of waiting years to get a bolt in rack. I'm looking to get away from that old car steering and try to be more like my steering in my 00' GT.
Does anyone have a 19:1 steering box? And what's everyone's opinion on Flaming River's steering boxes?
 

skywalker

Member
Dec 22, 2003
733
0
16
Pensacola, FL
May 9, 2005
#2
  • May 9, 2005
  • #2
I hear good things about them but you're not going to get steering like you're '00 without rack and pinion.h
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
May 10, 2005
#3
  • May 10, 2005
  • #3
I got the 16:1 box and the quality was very good. It fit with no modifications. I wish I would of got the 19:1 because on a manual steering car it is really tough to manuver at low speeds.
 

yeloxr7

Member
Apr 18, 2005
429
0
16
May 10, 2005
#4
  • May 10, 2005
  • #4
Borgeson (www.borgeson.com) has remanufactured steering boxes for less than the Flaming River ones. From what I understand, they polish all the bearing surfaces and install new ball bearings as well as better seals. (see Ford Builder Magazine's first issue). I purchased one and installed it a couple of weeks ago but have not been able to evaluate it yet due to power steering hydraulics issues.

I have heard good and bad about the Flaming River boxes. I know from personal experience that their rack conversion kits will only fit certain engine/exhaust combinations. My experience is probably why their ads for the rack kits now say "for Mustangs only" (I have a 69 Cougar 351W with stock exhaust manifolds)
 

red65

Member
Apr 12, 2003
411
0
17
Ann Arbor, MI
May 10, 2005
#5
  • May 10, 2005
  • #5
I'm pretty pleased with the Flaming River 16:1 in my '65; Manual steering with 235/45R17's on the front. Steering effort isn't little-old-lady friendly, but it's not unmanageable, and the steering response is night and day better than the original box. Installation was no more difficult than a stock steering box - a modest amount of disassembly and tinkering required, but nothing radical. I think it's a good option.
 
6

66moneypit

Member
Dec 28, 2004
536
0
17
Northern Va
May 10, 2005
#6
  • May 10, 2005
  • #6
yeloxr7 said:
Borgeson (www.borgeson.com) has remanufactured steering boxes for less than the Flaming River ones. From what I understand, they polish all the bearing surfaces and install new ball bearings as well as better seals. (see Ford Builder Magazine's first issue). I purchased one and installed it a couple of weeks ago but have not been able to evaluate it yet due to power steering hydraulics issues.

I have heard good and bad about the Flaming River boxes. I know from personal experience that their rack conversion kits will only fit certain engine/exhaust combinations. My experience is probably why their ads for the rack kits now say "for Mustangs only" (I have a 69 Cougar 351W with stock exhaust manifolds)
Click to expand...


I have been following this thread because I have similar questions. I was going to go with the Flaming River Rack set but decided otherwise....too expensive to screw with right now. I am a newbie to this expensive ass hobby...so forgive my ignorance.... How does the steering ratio affect the ease of turning... I.E. does 16:1 turn easier or harder than 19:1 ?
 

yeloxr7

Member
Apr 18, 2005
429
0
16
May 10, 2005
#7
  • May 10, 2005
  • #7
66moneypit said:
I have been following this thread because I have similar questions. I was going to go with the Flaming River Rack set but decided otherwise....too expensive to screw with right now. I am a newbie to this expensive ass hobby...so forgive my ignorance.... How does the steering ratio affect the ease of turning... I.E. does 16:1 turn easier or harder than 19:1 ?
Click to expand...

It's the ratio of turns of the steering wheel to turns of the sector shaft. The 16:1 box requires more effort at the steering wheel than the 19:1 does.
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
May 10, 2005
#8
  • May 10, 2005
  • #8
Maybe I've got it wrong but doesn't the 19:1 turn the wheels faster than the 16:1? What I mean is it takes less turns of the steering wheel to go from lock to lock with a 19:1, by about 1 turn less then the 16:1. Right?
 
6

6T6coupe

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2000
219
0
0
May 10, 2005
#9
  • May 10, 2005
  • #9
The 16:1 box is faster but has higher effort.
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
May 10, 2005
#10
  • May 10, 2005
  • #10
Doh, I thought that I saw a Shelby GT350R steering box and it had a 19:1 ratio. So, I naturally thought that it would have been a faster lock to lock. I must have seen it wrong, or did I? Maybe it did have a 19:1 and the newer thing is to have 16:1??? I'm lost
 
6

6T6coupe

Founding Member
Jul 15, 2000
219
0
0
May 10, 2005
#11
  • May 10, 2005
  • #11
19:1 is the manual steering ratio. 16:1 is the PS and manual GT ratio.
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
May 13, 2005
#12
  • May 13, 2005
  • #12
So does anyone know what Shelby put into the GT350R's? He put a faster ratio manual steering box but I would have thought knowing Shelby he would have put something faster than a 16:1.
Anyone got the facts?
 

Loup-garou

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2001
337
0
16
New Orleans, LA
May 13, 2005
#13
  • May 13, 2005
  • #13
XXBULLETSXX said:
So does anyone know what Shelby put into the GT350R's? He put a faster ratio manual steering box but I would have thought knowing Shelby he would have put something faster than a 16:1.
Anyone got the facts?
Click to expand...

AFAIK, Shelby used the 16:1 box in the GT-350, but also added a "quick steer kit" (longer Pitman and Idler arms). I'm sure that changed the effective ratio, but I don't know what the net number would be.

The quick steering kit is usually sold with a "not for power sterring-equipped cars" advisory, even though the PS cars also used the 16:1 box. There may be a mechanical interference on PS cars, or perhaps the quicker ratio causes the power assist to "lag" behind the steering input; perhaps someone else here knows the details.
 

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
May 14, 2005
#14
  • May 14, 2005
  • #14
I know that the dealer sold GT350's had the 16:1 ratio but I thought that I read some where that the GT35R (race version) had an even faster ratio. But maybe I read it wrong or I'm remembering wrong.
But you make a very good point, I didn't think about the other added parts making it a faster ratio. I wonder if I can find those extra parts to make mine faster since it's a manual steering car.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Best place to source power steering parts for a '67? (control valve, ram, hoses)
  • SophiaTatum
  • Jun 15, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
63
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
SophiaTatum
S
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
69
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
J
Severe shaking/vibrations in steering wheel
  • jacket999
  • May 20, 2025
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
801
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jun 1, 2025
NtheGAME
N
67 mustang with borgeson style steering box
  • 67coupestang
  • May 26, 2024
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
1K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jul 21, 2024
horse sence
G
Integral power steering box options
  • GOvert
  • Jul 20, 2024
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
558
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2024
GOvert
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?