• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Drums or disc 1/4 times

  • Thread starter Thread starter gt-351
  • Start date Start date Dec 7, 2006
G

gt-351

New Member
Oct 25, 2004
136
0
0
va
Dec 7, 2006
#1
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #1
Just wondering if anyone has changed there setup from drum to disc and noticed a difference in 1/4 mile times. It seems the rotational mass by the drums would be slower, but I think the disc seem to put more drag on the wheel.
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Dec 7, 2006
#2
  • Dec 7, 2006
  • #2
I think the disc should actually reduce drag. Drums actually have a brake line pressure thingie that holds a little bit of line pressure to the shoes all the time. If I remember correctly, this is the link that is located under the passenger side hood hinge in the rear brake line that everybody replaces with teh brake bias dial when they do rear disc conversions
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Dec 8, 2006
#3
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #3
i do know that the aerospace drag brake kit takes 42 lbs off the front end when compared to the weight of stock brakes. and i also know that in some cases like my friend scotts, will cause the car to stand on the bumper lol. http://www.boyerracingmotorsports.com/ lol and i also know that alumastars weigh 7 lbs. lighter a piece than draglites. just thought i would throw that info in there for u.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Dec 8, 2006
#4
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #4
seijirou said:
I think the disc should actually reduce drag. Drums actually have a brake line pressure thingie that holds a little bit of line pressure to the shoes all the time. If I remember correctly, this is the link that is located under the passenger side hood hinge in the rear brake line that everybody replaces with teh brake bias dial when they do rear disc conversions
Click to expand...

There is not constant line pressure at the rear drums. They are adjusted with an expanding rod to hold a slight amount of pressure, and if not adjusted properly, can chip and even break the shoes.
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Dec 8, 2006
#5
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #5
triple post lol
 

stang8urimport

Autozone Junkie
Founding Member
Jun 21, 2002
1,499
12
59
Daytona Beach, FL
Dec 8, 2006
#6
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #6
dp
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 8, 2006
#7
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #7
I'd say the biggest benefit is weight loss....i highly doubt you'd notice any ET gains just from a brake swap, even with Aerospace disks. It's the kind of thing that would add up with a few other mods and then maybe you'd pick up a couple tenths.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Dec 8, 2006
#8
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #8
There is a little more to figuring out which is quicker.

This question all depends on the weight of the individual disk and drum AND the diameter of the disk and drum.

The drums are more compact being only 9" on the Mustang, while some disk brakes are 10-11" in diameter in the rear. SO which matters more? Being closer to the center of rotation...or being lighter in weight??

The math is too complicated for an answer on a friday evening
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,598
223
Northern KY
Dec 8, 2006
#9
  • Dec 8, 2006
  • #9
Mustang5L5 said:
There is a little more to figuring out which is quicker.

This question all depends on the weight of the individual disk and drum AND the diameter of the disk and drum.

The drums are more compact being only 9" on the Mustang, while some disk brakes are 10-11" in diameter in the rear. SO which matters more? Being closer to the center of rotation...or being lighter in weight??

The math is too complicated for an answer on a friday evening
Click to expand...


Yeah, the rotational mass of a 13 inch or even stock 10 inch rotor would be much more than a 9 inch drum and in all actuality the 13 inch rotor probably weighs more than the drum setup anyways. The Aerospace disks on the other hand are single disk wide like a motorcycle, but are not recommended for street use because of that reason so i wouldn't run one on the street even on a weekend cruiser.
 

silverstangman

New Member
Mar 26, 2003
413
0
0
Eastern NC
Dec 11, 2006
#10
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #10
they actually have a drag race kit and then a street kit for our cars.
 
S

seijirou

Founding Member
Aug 15, 2002
2,417
4
48
DFW
Dec 11, 2006
#11
  • Dec 11, 2006
  • #11
PoopDawg said:
There is not constant line pressure at the rear drums. They are adjusted with an expanding rod to hold a slight amount of pressure, and if not adjusted properly, can chip and even break the shoes.
Click to expand...

I'm not sure you understood what I'm referring to.

It is known as a residual pressure check valve. It does not allow line pressure to the drum brakes to drop below a certain PSI. I can't remember what the psi is on the Mustang.

Here is a link to some that Wilwood sells. http://www.wilwood.com/Products/006-MasterCylinders/010-RPV/index.asp

If you google search the topic, you can find articles from Bendix on troubleshooting drum brakes that even mention checking the residual pressure check valve if your drum brakes are squishy.

After you take a look at the wilwood link. Take a look at your brake lines under the hood, on the passenger side right next to the hinge. What looks like a brake line connection is infact a residual pressure check valve. Note, no other brake lines throughout the car have any connections like this except for the line to the rear drums. Mustangs with 4 wheel disc factory do not have this connector. Most of them aren't doing their job anymore on our older foxes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Which SN95 axles for 93 LX, disc brakes, ABS rings?
  • dan50
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
417
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
7-UP BILL
8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
501
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
D
66 Coupe Progress Thread
  • DTCRAWLEY
  • Apr 19, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
43
Views
993
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 17, 2026
DTCRAWLEY
D
Rear drums dragging
  • cnorman31
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 15, 2025
AeroCoupe
Drivetrain Rear brake drum question
  • limp
  • Jul 9, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 15, 2024
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?