• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

DUW, back in the sn95 game................sorta :)

  • Thread starter Thread starter super302
  • Start date Start date Aug 28, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 28, 2005
#41
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #41
super302 said:
ya, definately a sleeper, Even if people think its a v8, they have no idea it runs 12's
Click to expand...
12s? Unless I missed something its got lt's and gears. That mid 13s on a good day.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 28, 2005
#42
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #42
Car RamRod said:
12s? Unless I missed something its got lt's and gears. That mid 13s on a good day.
Click to expand...

I guess I COULD get the timeslips from the previous guy...why does everyone not belive me
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 28, 2005
#43
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #43
well because its a 260 fwhp car, with longtubes as the only power adder. Its a crapshoot, but Im gonna guess about 240 to the wheels, tops. Unless If Im missing some kinda mods here?
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Aug 28, 2005
#44
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #44
I believe you...the DOHC Cobras LOVE to rev. The factory 3.27s were not enough to get them moving. Your 4.30s are perfect for the high RPM DOHC motor; that and the Nittos would probably be enough to eek 12s.
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Aug 28, 2005
#45
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #45
well because its a 260 fwhp car, with longtubes as the only power adder. Its a crapshoot, but Im gonna guess about 240 to the wheels, tops. Unless If Im missing some kinda mods here?
Click to expand...

What the **** are you talking about? The motor was slightly underated by Ford at 305 horsepower...they didn't perform as well as they should have because they didn't have enough gear for the high winding engine.
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 28, 2005
#46
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #46
Swarzkopf said:
What the **** are you talking about? The motor was slightly underated by Ford at 305 horsepower...they didn't perform as well as they should have because they didn't have enough gear for the high winding engine.
Click to expand...
Ok someone straigten me out here. Is this NOT the 2v, 260 horse mustang gt engine? The 305 horse one is in the mach 1. If this was a mach 1, then I would believe those times, because yes, those engines wake up with gears. So what engine or car is this?
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 28, 2005
#47
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #47
ah, I missed the 98 cobra engine part, my bad.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 28, 2005
#48
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #48
disregard
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Aug 28, 2005
#49
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #49
He already corrected himself no need to get your panties in a twist lol.
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 28, 2005
#50
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #50
super302 said:
get your facts straight before you start talking shtt
Click to expand...
wasnt talkin ****, just a little skeptical.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 28, 2005
#51
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #51
wytstang said:
He already corrected himself no need to get your panties in a twist lol.
Click to expand...
but i need to twist my panties to make them fit

BTW-we must have been typing at the same time, i guess i'll edit my post like a good little boy
 

Car RamRod

Banned
Mar 30, 2005
623
0
0
Queens, NYC
Aug 28, 2005
#52
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #52
super302 said:
BTW-we must have been typing at the same time, i guess i'll edit my post like a good little boy
Click to expand...
these thing happen....no hard feelings
 

SeventyMach1

Keep it lubed .... keep it straight .... and keep
Mar 30, 2005
1,940
3
36
North Carolina
Aug 28, 2005
#53
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #53
super302 said:
i drove it 100miles, at ~75mph it was just under 3k, the IMRC's open at 3250 so i made sure to not cruise above that

for you that dont know (dinosaur 5.0 guys), the IMRC's=intake manifold runner controls...basically, when they open the gas milage goes to the frogs
Click to expand...


Wow, I never heard that. I just learned something from Patrick.....what is this world coming to? J/K man. I guess I am a T-rex....
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 28, 2005
#54
  • Aug 28, 2005
  • #54
SeventyMach1 said:
Wow, I never heard that. I just learned something from Patrick.....what is this world coming to? J/K man. I guess I am a T-rex....
Click to expand...
I usually throw out some technical jargon once a year....but only if its a full moon and on an even numbered day
 
M

Mac-man

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
300
0
0
south texas
Aug 29, 2005
#55
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #55
super302 said:
I guess I COULD get the timeslips from the previous guy...why does everyone not belive me
Click to expand...

i believe u cuz i owned one. thats a 12 second car you have. and if u have longtubes, and some sort of cold air induction and pullies even u would be at the 300 rwhp mark. 4V motors make good pwoer box stock even NA, and they rev to the moon. u have one sweet A** car dude.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 29, 2005
#56
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #56
Mac-man said:
i believe u cuz i owned one. thats a 12 second car you have. and if u have longtubes, and some sort of cold air induction and pullies even u would be at the 300 rwhp mark. 4V motors make good pwoer box stock even NA, and they rev to the moon. u have one sweet A** car dude.
Click to expand...
thanks man
I'm looking into getting a JLT cold air intake...know where to get one
That dam "dip" in the stock intake tract has to be pretty restrictive (my excuse to change it)
 
M

Mac-man

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
300
0
0
south texas
Aug 29, 2005
#57
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #57
i hear that the jlt is the best. go to www.forums.modulardepot.com for modular needs. stangnet is an awesome sight,specially for a 5.0, but for modulars i would recommend them they can help u with anything. if u buy pullies get steeda only or somehting with an sfi balancer/pulley assembly. the piggyback pullies tend to cause those motors to spin rod bearings for some reason. also go to www.boss330racing.com , as he is the man for 4V stuff, and can help u out with anything u plan to do to the car.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 29, 2005
#58
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #58
Mac-man said:
i hear that the jlt is the best. go to www.forums.modulardepot.com for modular needs. stangnet is an awesome sight,specially for a 5.0, but for modulars i would recommend them they can help u with anything. if u buy pullies get steeda only or somehting with an sfi balancer/pulley assembly. the piggyback pullies tend to cause those motors to spin rod bearings for some reason. also go to www.boss330racing.com , as he is the man for 4V stuff, and can help u out with anything u plan to do to the car.
Click to expand...
thanks for the info
I've been trying to learn all i can about these motors, i found out the blocks are the ****NET and so is the crank, the crappy pistons make me mad though
I also learned (from looking) that the engine bay is CRAMPED
 
M

Mac-man

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
300
0
0
south texas
Aug 29, 2005
#59
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #59
from my experience with modulars, u want to hope and pray u dont blow an exhaust manifold gasket specially with LT's, and the pistons and rods do suck, but they hold u pto 7K revs which isnt to bad. these motors are also not like the stock 302 black whereas it is maxed at 500 horse roughly. both the stock block and crank have been in cars making as much as 750RWHP with absolutely no problems whatsoever. u will learn to love the cra and how smooth it is.
 

super302

I'd do anything for free Bapples
May 29, 2004
2,878
1
0
Davenport, IA
Aug 29, 2005
#60
  • Aug 29, 2005
  • #60
Teksid block, 6bolt main, crankshaft forged by Gerlach-Werke, stock 80mm mass air sensor, twin 57mm bore throttle body
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 3 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?