• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Dyno Results

  • Thread starter Thread starter DerekStangGT
  • Start date Start date Apr 23, 2005
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 23, 2005
#1
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #1
first of all, it was on a mustang dyno i was thinking it was a dyno jet, but oh well, at least im not a dyno virgin anymore. anyway, today there was a mustang dyno day and the cost was only $20 for 3 pulls. i was on standby, so i get an email last week saying i got the first spot on saturday at 8:00am. so i get there and only EJ was there moving around cars. then the owner shows up and says "how'd you like a free dyno for helping me push some cars around?" so i helped move two stangs and got 3 free pulls w/ A/F readings im disapointed w/ the results since the mustang dyno takes weight into consideration. the owner also said my 4.10s sapped a lot of power too. he said my A/F ratio was perfect. right at 12.9-13.0. anyway, on with the pics!


 

Attachments

  • HPIM0651.webp
    14.3 KB · Views: 133
  • HPIM0649.webp
    17.7 KB · Views: 111
  • HPIM0652.webp
    7.7 KB · Views: 125

mrvax

Stay thirsty my friends
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,225
3
79
SN Moderator: Orlando, Fl.
Apr 23, 2005
#2
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #2
Great to have your a/f at 13.0:1. I dunno but some people can do a rough conversion from the Mustang Dyno to DynoJet. I'm going to move this to Tech in case someone knows.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 23, 2005
#3
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #3
mrvax said:
Great to have your a/f at 13.0:1. I dunno but some people can do a rough conversion from the Mustang Dyno to DynoJet. I'm going to move this to Tech in case someone knows.
Click to expand...
thanks mrvax
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 23, 2005
#4
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #4
I thought it was 20% difference from Mustang Dyno to DynoJet but that can't be right as it would put you at 260rwhp DynoJet with only o/r, dumps, timing.



$20 is ****ing awesome. I paid $50 for 2 pulls with a/f on dyno day on a DynoJet.
 
D

DerekStangGT

My package is in the mail!
Feb 18, 2003
1,068
0
36
Apr 23, 2005
#5
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #5
JonJon said:
I thought it was 20% difference from Mustang Dyno to DynoJet but that can't be right as it would put you at 260rwhp DynoJet with only o/r, dumps, timing.



$20 is ****ing awesome. I paid $50 for 2 pulls with a/f on dyno day on a DynoJet.
Click to expand...
i calculated a 10% difference and got like 247 rwhp. even that sounds a little high. yeah, $20 was a good deal, but i didnt even have to pay that!!
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Apr 23, 2005
#6
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #6
The guy i raced put down 234/270 on that same dyno (ccs tuning) here in austin after it was custom dyno tuned (231 before). He turned a 13.6 @ 103 down at SAR before the tune. My friends 02 SS put down 286RWHP on the dyno. I want to run on a dyno jet though, BUT I may take it too him.That weight seem sort of high, and I know he doesnt have a weighing station around there.
 

Mike97gt

it doe snot
Founding Member
Jan 26, 1999
10,633
7
89
the people's republic of massachusetts
Apr 23, 2005
#7
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #7
hotmustang331 said:
The guy i raced put down 234/270 on that same dyno (ccs tuning) here in austin after it was custom dyno tuned (231 before). He turned a 13.6 @ 103 down at SAR before the tune. My friends 02 SS put down 286RWHP on the dyno. I want to run on a dyno jet though, BUT I may take it too him.That weight seem sort of high, and I know he doesnt have a weighing station around there.
Click to expand...


286 is low for a ls1 stick... was he a auto... if he was a stick then this dyno reads a little low...
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 23, 2005
#8
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #8
MikeZ28 said:
286 is low for a ls1 stick... was he a auto... if he was a stick then this dyno reads a little low...
Click to expand...
It's a Mustang Dyno remember...
 

RedDaemon

10 Year Member
Mar 31, 2005
3,470
9
108
Atlanta, GA
Apr 23, 2005
#9
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #9
is a mustang dyno that bad in which they overcompensated for friction? i alsways thought its better than a dyno jet, putting a load on the car instead of just winding up the engine...i wouldnt expect ur car to be THAT powerful since u only have a midpipe c/b and timing adjusted..your car could also just have had a low stock HP number to begin with just like some other cars on here..
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Apr 23, 2005
#10
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #10
Here is their web site, www.ccstuning.com and check out their dyno results section. Some of the 350HP GTOs put down LOW #s. This dyno loads for weight, and wind resistance, and probably a few other factors. The SS is a 6spd with nothing more than a custom tune (actually on 87 octain LOL, but we wont go there) but was run with 93 mix and the ecu kept bumping timing each run.Went fron 267 to 286 in 3 pulls, then they shut it down...probably still had some more left init. Funny thing is that before gears and chip mine pulled just about the same as his (he drove it). I need to race him. He also had a bout 75K when he tested it.
 

JonJon

Founding Member
Aug 16, 2002
4,801
1
68
back in Marylands
Apr 23, 2005
#11
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #11
-=NightHawk=- said:
is a mustang dyno that bad in which they overcompensated for friction? i alsways thought its better than a dyno jet, putting a load on the car instead of just winding up the engine...i wouldnt expect ur car to be THAT powerful since u only have a midpipe c/b and timing adjusted..your car could also just have had a low stock HP number to begin with just like some other cars on here..
Click to expand...
If they use the dyno incorrectly (weight, gearing, other stuff?) then yes, it's bad because it gives incorrect numbers
 

loosescrew79

New Member
Dec 18, 2004
313
0
0
Apr 23, 2005
#12
  • Apr 23, 2005
  • #12
Putting mine on the dyno tomorrow. 40 bucks for 5 pulls.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need Some Dyno Video File Sizes
  • Noobz347
  • Jan 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
373
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 20, 2025
TOOLOW91
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
603
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
438
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
S
Upgrade Advice on an 89 GT Convertible NJ
  • SteakDad
  • Apr 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 18, 2025
limp
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
1K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Oct 7, 2026
2v_johnny
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?