• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

dyno results

  • Thread starter Thread starter h8my408
  • Start date Start date Oct 16, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
M

MyFordsFly

Founding Member
Oct 29, 2001
151
1
18
Oct 17, 2007
#21
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #21
S351Saleen77 said:
The guy at the Dyno you went to blew my motor up in 2002.

EJ It is a Dyno Jet there......so like you were saying how could they even get a reading if their tach portion wasn't working correctly??
Click to expand...

Well Im thinking they shouldnt have charged him then. The few times we really had issues getting a good tach reading we did what we could for the person at the time, didnt charge them, and made sure they knew we would take good care of them next time they came in.
 

h8my408

Member
Aug 27, 2007
93
0
7
Houston, Tx
Oct 17, 2007
#22
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #22
i dont know, talk about some i left the dyno with a car that had a flat spot so bad it would spin the tires! (bog and then jump to 2500rpms like dropping the clutch)

i think i would have rather spent 600 on a wideband sensor and just street tuned it myself. at least i know what my next mod is: an expensive ass gauge to tune my damn car with.
 

h8my408

Member
Aug 27, 2007
93
0
7
Houston, Tx
Oct 17, 2007
#23
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #23
yeah so im looking at the sheet right now and it only goes to 4.25 (rpmx1000)

so i thought it was 4750 but it was 4250... damn that shop. im getting even more and more irritated as the hours pass...
 

cobradvm

New Member
Sep 2, 2003
245
1
0
Woodinville, WA
Oct 17, 2007
#24
  • Oct 17, 2007
  • #24
h8my408 said:
i dont know, talk about some i left the dyno with a car that had a flat spot so bad it would spin the tires! (bog and then jump to 2500rpms like dropping the clutch)

i think i would have rather spent 600 on a wideband sensor and just street tuned it myself. at least i know what my next mod is: an expensive ass gauge to tune my damn car with.
Click to expand...


Yep - came to the same conclusion - after having the car dyno'd 3 times, and all the dyno guys would do is bump the FP, I gave up on dynos, bought an AEM AF gauge, PMS, and datalogging software and tuned it myself. Shoulda done that from the start.
 

h8my408

Member
Aug 27, 2007
93
0
7
Houston, Tx
Oct 18, 2007
#25
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #25
once again, the only way to do something right is to do it yourself. and there are some great areas here in seattle to do 4th gear pulls...
 

S351Saleen77

Member
Jun 27, 2002
423
0
16
Washington
Oct 18, 2007
#26
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #26
h8my408 said:
yeah so im looking at the sheet right now and it only goes to 4.25 (rpmx1000)

so i thought it was 4750 but it was 4250... damn that shop. im getting even more and more irritated as the hours pass...
Click to expand...


There are good shops out there. I have had Blood Enterprises do the tuning on my D.F.I. since the have a Mustang Dyno he can load it down and simulate real world driving and get it pretty close. He was also the factory recommended tuner for my D.F.I., I do still have driveability issues and would like to try another place that is good with D.F.I. tuning just to have a fresh look at it. But not all shops are bad. For some reason my wide band 02 reads off from the dynos so it still pays to make sure that is correct before you start tuning.

Thats why I went to T.T. because they said they knew all about my system. Well they ran it once to get a baseline with Bloods tune which was safe but "rich" so he leans it out with one keystroke.......it was a little too lean on the second pull so he made another change which was supposed to richen it up and guess what....it went leaner and so did 6 pistons!! Needless to say I would never recommend them to anybody.
 

94gsl5.0

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
223
0
0
seatown
Oct 18, 2007
#27
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #27
For some reason my wide band 02 reads off from the dynos so it still pays to make sure that is correct before you start tuning.
Click to expand...

What wideband are you using? Can you cal it? We have used several different Co. widebands and have found them all to be off to one degree or another. However, The Innovates tend to be spot on and you can recal them.

Also are you using a integral wideband with your ECU or a standalone wideband unit with an analog signal to your ECU? I have found that if you have a dirty signal from the Wideband driver/controller box to the ECU, you can get different voltage readings, which makes for differing A/F readings at the ECU...
 
S

Stangler

A.K.A. Mr. Hankey
Founding Member
Dec 20, 2001
1,357
1
37
Oct 18, 2007
#28
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #28
I have a Innovate LC-1 on my car, with the XD-16 guage. It is the best money I've spent on the car. I've done all the tuning on it.

Nate

p.s. I've never had my car on a dyno either...
 

S351Saleen77

Member
Jun 27, 2002
423
0
16
Washington
Oct 18, 2007
#29
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #29
94gsl5.0 said:
What wideband are you using? Can you cal it? We have used several different Co. widebands and have found them all to be off to one degree or another. However, The Innovates tend to be spot on and you can recal them.

Also are you using a integral wideband with your ECU or a standalone wideband unit with an analog signal to your ECU? I have found that if you have a dirty signal from the Wideband driver/controller box to the ECU, you can get different voltage readings, which makes for differing A/F readings at the ECU...
Click to expand...

I have D.F.I. which is stand alone system. It is the Accel Gen 7 D.F.I. so I don't have a ECU. The wideband is an Accel product also made for the system. At the time you couldn't recal it, maybe now they have some software upgrades that I could get and do it.

My point was don't get a wideband and think its right on without checking it on a dyno.....or maybe 2 different dynos. Its cheap insurance if your sensor is saying your rich but your really lean...especially if you have boost......it only took 5 sec at full throttle to blow my motor!
 

S351Saleen77

Member
Jun 27, 2002
423
0
16
Washington
Oct 18, 2007
#30
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #30
tt
 

94gsl5.0

New Member
Sep 7, 2004
223
0
0
seatown
Oct 18, 2007
#31
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #31
I totally agree with you, you must make sure that the wideband is accurate or else its useless and you will end up blown headgaskets or melted pistons. Been there... not fun.

To clarify my above post I use the term ECU as the be all word for any "black box" that runs the engine. I am currently running a AEM stand alone ECU with a LM-1 wideband with 02 feedback always on. I was running into discrepecies between what A/F the LM-1 Innovate control box was reading and what AEM was translating that into (lm-1 box plugged permanently in to AEM) My logs showed dead rich at 11.5 when i was actually at 12.0. Turns out the analog ground from LM-1 box should be grounded to the analog ground input on the AEM (not the chassis)... then it was almost in synch... to fine tune i played with the gain. Now the AEM sees exactly what LM-1 is telling it. Finding out i was half a point off was very eye opening. Especially when i run the car with constant 02 feedback even under WOT...

I thought maybe there might be a chance your issue could be similar since you were running a standalone ECU with wideband input... However i am not familier with the ACCEL stuff... so it was kind of a shot in the dark.

PS. Tom, the hooker headers fit. Its tight, I see what you mean by them being a bit small though.... lol.
 

h8my408

Member
Aug 27, 2007
93
0
7
Houston, Tx
Oct 18, 2007
#32
  • Oct 18, 2007
  • #32
hey stangler, where'd you get the lc-1 and how much did it cost you? i saw that last night while surfing around, and i think i saw $599?

if you ask me i'd say that's the best money ANYONE could buy.

edit: i dont know what that means, so let me rephrase..:
best money anyone could spend!
 

S351Saleen77

Member
Jun 27, 2002
423
0
16
Washington
Oct 19, 2007
#33
  • Oct 19, 2007
  • #33
94gsl5.0 said:
I thought maybe there might be a chance your issue could be similar since you were running a standalone ECU with wideband input... However i am not familier with the ACCEL stuff... so it was kind of a shot in the dark.

PS. Tom, the hooker headers fit. Its tight, I see what you mean by them being a bit small though.... lol.
Click to expand...


Good thought Its something I should look into.

Yeah the headers are just not for a blown 408......but it gets you by until later. I can't wait to get some big tubes on.
 
S

Stangler

A.K.A. Mr. Hankey
Founding Member
Dec 20, 2001
1,357
1
37
Oct 20, 2007
#34
  • Oct 20, 2007
  • #34
h8my408 said:
hey stangler, where'd you get the lc-1 and how much did it cost you? i saw that last night while surfing around, and i think i saw $599?

if you ask me i'd say that's the best money ANYONE could buy.

edit: i dont know what that means, so let me rephrase..:
best money anyone could spend!
Click to expand...


I got my LC-1 through www.DIYautotune.com and the XD-16 guage from Jegs. If I would have known Krazy Koncepts was a dealer, i'd have got them from Jon. The guage was not cheap, but being able to program the LED's to the color I want helps when your running down the track. 10-11.99 is green and 12.00-20.00 is red. When I'm racing, it is very easy to read and if you see red, you get your foot off the gas. ahhh,...Good times.....

Nate
 

Attachments

  • XD-16.webp
    15 KB · Views: 102
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
Shocked by Dyno Results - 1990 Mark VII with 5.0 HO
  • 88Mark7
  • Mar 12, 2018
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
6
Views
7K
Other Auto Tech Oct 6, 2018
I Bleed Ford Blue
J
Dyno results status post Kooks long tube header installation
  • jgibby
  • Apr 8, 2009
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
11
Views
5K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 9, 2009
Gearbanger 101
dyno results - My first time
  • washMO66
  • Aug 26, 2006
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
14
Views
866
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Aug 28, 2006
washMO66
SN65, Bob Kurgan, Speed Inc. Dyno results
  • SN65
  • Jun 24, 2006
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 25, 2006
GNN60GT500
G
I'm Sill Alive! Very Strange Dyno Results Inside
  • red94fiveo
  • Jul 16, 2004
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
12
Views
1K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 24, 2006
SeventyMach1
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?