DynoMax Shorties, 87713, 88713 on a 99+

2000GTnoExtras

Founding Member

Apr 2, 2002

990

0

0

45

Rocklin

Dec 30, 2003

#1

• Dec 30, 2003

• #1

Hey, these headers are listed for 96-98 cars, is the exhaust (engine side of midpipe) different on 96-98?

Anybody have these? Will they work?

BBK seems to be dragging their feet releasing their shorties. These are a little cheaper and even carry a CARB number!

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category=33631&item=2450279321

http://www.dynomax.com/documents/street_series.pdf

Thanks!

 

gruntman31

Founding Member

Apr 22, 2002

624

0

0

Colorado Springs, Co

Dec 30, 2003

#2

• Dec 30, 2003

• #2

Shorties are junk. Don't waste your time with them. You'll get 0-5 RWHP. Go for LT's - those are worth 15-20 RWHP.

 

CBASS

Founding Member

May 4, 2000

853

0

17

49

Wichita, KS

Dec 30, 2003

#3

• Dec 30, 2003

• #3

Those shorties look terrible. I can understand why the individual is gettting rid of them. Like what was said above, go with longtubes.

 

D

delow1902

Founding Member

Sep 1, 2000

365

0

0

Killeen,TX,USA

Dec 30, 2003

#4

• Dec 30, 2003

• #4

Listen to what's stated, I had dynomax headers and they're not worth getting. Mind wasn't ceramic coated, but still no gains was shown worthwhile.

 

2000GTnoExtras

Founding Member

Apr 2, 2002

990

0

0

45

Rocklin

Dec 30, 2003

#5

• Dec 30, 2003

• #5

ttt

I can't go LTs, I'm in CA.
Also, they don't look any worse than the FRPP headers (which are not CARB approved).

Any body else??

 

CBASS

Founding Member

May 4, 2000

853

0

17

49

Wichita, KS

Dec 30, 2003

#6

• Dec 30, 2003

• #6

I don't like the welds. That screams slag inside the tubes. Plus I don't like the tube layout. It would look better if they all fed into the collector.