• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

E2 kit photo

  • Thread starter Thread starter '69Mach1
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2005

'69Mach1

New Member
Sep 17, 2005
45
0
0
Northern N.J.
Dec 16, 2005
#1
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #1
Has anyone seen one of these kit's installed on a '66 convertible? I have only seen the fastback ,and coupe ,I'd like to see a photo of a convertible done up like this ,my wife is bugging me to do this to our car.
(not that I would mind )
 

Attachments

  • E2FB%20006b.webp
    53.3 KB · Views: 694
P

PJx5x

Member
Mar 30, 2005
197
0
16
Chicago
Dec 16, 2005
#2
  • Dec 16, 2005
  • #2


sry for the crappyness, but it sorta works
 

Attachments

  • e2fb006b8hw.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 167

stangman16

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
640
4
29
San Antonio, TX
Dec 17, 2005
#3
  • Dec 17, 2005
  • #3
Hehehe - did you use MS paint?
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Dec 17, 2005
#4
  • Dec 17, 2005
  • #4
i believe they have the "ronster" kit which is strickly for verts. its somewhat the same too.
 

rusted-resto

Member
May 11, 2005
37
0
6
eureka, ca
Dec 17, 2005
#5
  • Dec 17, 2005
  • #5
Mustang Monthley has the 67 vert eleanor pics, maybe that would give you some idea.
 

65conv50

New Member
Jan 8, 2003
290
0
0
Greenville, South Carolina
Dec 17, 2005
#6
  • Dec 17, 2005
  • #6
The "Ronster" kit is NOT for convertibles. It makes a roadster or convertible out of a notchback. Will not work on convertibles, as the windshield is different.
 
T

tylerrocks

New Member
Oct 13, 2005
514
0
0
Big Spring, TX
Dec 18, 2005
#7
  • Dec 18, 2005
  • #7
WoRD
 

Silver66FsBk

New Member
Nov 5, 2005
51
0
0
Dec 18, 2005
#8
  • Dec 18, 2005
  • #8
here you go
 

'69Mach1

New Member
Sep 17, 2005
45
0
0
Northern N.J.
Dec 19, 2005
#9
  • Dec 19, 2005
  • #9
Hey Thank's for taking the time to make up the photo,that car look's pi$$ed
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Dec 19, 2005
#10
  • Dec 19, 2005
  • #10
Ill be the one to say it.....i think that is disgusting

i say leave the elenore kits for the fastbacks
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 19, 2005
#11
  • Dec 19, 2005
  • #11
I think it even looks wrong on fastbacks. It seems all placticky and bolt-onny to me.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Dec 19, 2005
#12
  • Dec 19, 2005
  • #12
any one notice the GT 350 stripes :dunno:
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 19, 2005
#13
  • Dec 19, 2005
  • #13
Nice job on the photoshop. I likey but I would be considered bias...

The 350 was just being politically correct for the 1965-66 version.

We didn't really design the E2 to make 65-66 clones. We designed it as a versatile kit to hot rod your coupe, conv, or fastback.



 

Attachments

  • DSCF0033.webp
    67.4 KB · Views: 619
  • rmr05%20020.webp
    51 KB · Views: 686

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Dec 19, 2005
#14
  • Dec 19, 2005
  • #14
They are pretty nice, I could do without the little pia type lights though. Love the side exhaust, not too modern looking in styling. That the the front grill is too bling for me, but to each his own. Nice cars though.
 

DukeGnarley

Member
Apr 2, 2003
597
2
19
Auburn/Ellensburg, Wa
Dec 20, 2005
#15
  • Dec 20, 2005
  • #15
i wish that valence would accept a bumper :-(
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 20, 2005
#16
  • Dec 20, 2005
  • #16
Well you could do it. Check out the episode Overhaulin did on the all too familiar "black w/silver stripes" 67 fb with the 22's on the back.

The e2 lower nose has become very popular, but it's not contoured like the bumper and the old racing aprons that have the little jog to match the hood line and bumper.






 

Attachments

  • C5ZZ-17757-A.gif
    11.2 KB · Views: 187
  • FS-ELN2-LN1.webp
    29.8 KB · Views: 227
  • fs-65ra.gif
    150.8 KB · Views: 219

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 20, 2005
#17
  • Dec 20, 2005
  • #17
mustangman70 said:
Ill be the one to say it.....i think that is disgusting

i say leave the elenore kits for the fastbacks
Click to expand...
It aint THAT bad, I like the wheels...

EDIT: I also like the shots jay posted, of course those are not eleanwhores...
 

Bullitt

Packin' Heat
Founding Member
Jan 13, 2000
2,743
0
47
Houston, TX
Dec 20, 2005
#18
  • Dec 20, 2005
  • #18
i like mdjay's black coupe, but don't care at all for the rest.

while i'm not a big eleanor fan to begin with, the body kit does like 10x better on a 67/68 car. the 65/66 are just too "cute" to look right with a body kit like that.

at least that's my opinion...
 
S

strange65

New Member
Dec 28, 2005
71
0
0
Dec 28, 2005
#19
  • Dec 28, 2005
  • #19
I going to copy those headlight buckets on the black mustang coupe but make them more squarish like on a 2005.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Detroit Speed 64-66 Front Speed Kit
  • Codyscar
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
235
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 21, 2025
General karthief
G
Intro and FB questions
  • gflat65
  • Nov 16, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
192
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 25, 2025
horse sence
Paint and Body Rotten moon roof trim
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
114
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 15, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
9
RECEIVED OFFER TO BY MY 92 LX CONVERTIBLE
  • 92StangGirl
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
143
What is it Worth?!?!? Mar 23, 2026
General karthief
L
Coupe seats in a convertible?
  • lparsons42
  • Aug 5, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
180
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Aug 6, 2025
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?