• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Effects of running no exhaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93GreenLX
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 17, 2004
#21
  • May 17, 2004
  • #21
Oh, it'll pass emissions Yeah I'll take a look under the car and start simple and see how I like it
 
M

MidnightThunder

New Member
Feb 22, 2004
39
0
0
North Ridgeville,Ohio
May 17, 2004
#22
  • May 17, 2004
  • #22
93GreenLX said:
What would happen if I ran no exhaust, just a Pacesetter longtube header.
Click to expand...

You would harm and eventually kill your engine.


Not to mention tons if tickets,possible loss of liscense,car impoundment,and maybe federal prison time.
 
1

140cilx

Founding Member
Sep 7, 2001
2,385
0
0
GA
May 17, 2004
#23
  • May 17, 2004
  • #23
MidnightThunder said:
You would harm and eventually kill your engine.
Click to expand...

I don't think this is true. Not going to get into a pissing match about it, but I ran a Chevy 350 w/ shorty headers like that for a year many years ago, heard the same argument from a few people. Never hurt a thing.

The header is still hot, the heads are still hot, they aren't going to be sucking in this freezing cold metal warping air that will bend valves. It's about 3 feet long. By the time the air hit's the valves from the intake side or exhaust side, it's warmed up. For instance, hot engine in the winter, freezing cold air hit's the intake valve, then goes into the cylinder, compressed against the exhaust valve, somehow everything survives.

I drove my LX some years ago about 25 miles to get an exhaust system for the car after I installed the Pacesetter Header - WHOA! WAS THAT LOUD! TREMENDOUSLY LOUD! COULDN'T HEAR YOURSELF THINK! It's not really a bass thunder rumble you'd hope for, it's a stocatto tinny metal POWPOWPOWPOWPOW.
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
May 17, 2004
#24
  • May 17, 2004
  • #24
The way I've heard it, the valves burn not bend. And it's not cause the air's cold (since it isn't). I've never heard a good explanation of why, but I'm trying to figure out a way for it to happen. Perhaps when there is valve overlap the piston can draw in extra air heating up the burn. But I gues as long as you have an O2 sensor the computer will richen it up? Does the 2.3 even have any overlap?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
May 17, 2004
#25
  • May 17, 2004
  • #25
nomuffler said:
The way I've heard it, the valves burn not bend. And it's not cause the air's cold (since it isn't). I've never heard a good explanation of why, but I'm trying to figure out a way for it to happen. Perhaps when there is valve overlap the piston can draw in extra air heating up the burn. But I gues as long as you have an O2 sensor the computer will richen it up? Does the 2.3 even have any overlap?
Click to expand...
Yup, they get brunt, not bent.
The velocity of the exhaust passing past the valves is much higher with just an open header. This causes more heat transfer to the valves, and in extreme cases can burn a slot in them, which causes them not to seal any more. If you are running a low performance NA engine, I wouldn't worry to much about burning a valve. The velocties stay slow, and the EGT's low.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 17, 2004
#26
  • May 17, 2004
  • #26
bhuff30 said:
loss of hearing
multitude of tickets
pissed off neighbors
no girlfriend or friends
burnt exhaust valves

the biggest problem is cold air traveling up the header after you stop, and harming the exhaust valve.
Click to expand...

This about sums it up right here
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
May 17, 2004
#27
  • May 17, 2004
  • #27
bhuff30 said:
Yup, they get brunt, not bent.
The velocity of the exhaust passing past the valves is much higher with just an open header. This causes more heat transfer to the valves, and in extreme cases can burn a slot in them, which causes them not to seal any more. If you are running a low performance NA engine, I wouldn't worry to much about burning a valve. The velocties stay slow, and the EGT's low.
Click to expand...
But wouldn't the O2 sensor richen the mixture when it saw higher EGT?
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
May 17, 2004
#28
  • May 17, 2004
  • #28
nomuffler said:
But wouldn't the O2 sensor richen the mixture when it saw higher EGT?
Click to expand...
The O2 sensor looks at the A/F ratio, and it only does that in closed loop (cruise speeds).
The problem isn't higher exhaust temps per say... it is higher exhaust velocities at the valve which causes more heat transfer to the valves. (just trust me on that, it has to do with renolds number, and I don't want to teach you heat transfer and fluid mechanics).
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
May 17, 2004
#29
  • May 17, 2004
  • #29
bhuff30 said:
The O2 sensor looks at the A/F ratio, and it only does that in closed loop (cruise speeds).
The problem isn't higher exhaust temps per say... it is higher exhaust velocities at the valve which causes more heat transfer to the valves. (just trust me on that, it has to do with renolds number, and I don't want to teach you heat transfer and fluid mechanics).
Click to expand...
Yeah, I get how it burns the valves. But wouldn't that heat the outgoing exhaust to? The O2 sensor determine the A/F ratio based on the temerature of the Exhaust gas, so it seems to me it'd richen the mixture whic DUH! damnit I just realized would't do **** to stop the burning valves. But, there's another downside, baad gas mileage de to the computer richening up what it thinks is a lean mix. Maybe? The computer only runs in closed loop at cruise? I thought they only did one or the other.
 

slow88stang

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
144
0
0
St Albert AB
May 17, 2004
#30
  • May 17, 2004
  • #30
Last year I was working on my exhaust and unhooked it at the flange right after the 2nd cat. I had to drive home like that and I hated it. Sure it was bassey but the whole car shook like crazy and Icouldnt even hear my stereo which is no cheap stereo. So without the cats I think that it would just be horribly loud. I had the 2 cats to a glasspack and a 3" tip and my parents could hear me coming about 2 1/2 miles away.
 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,896
73
129
Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom
May 17, 2004
#31
  • May 17, 2004
  • #31
nomuffler said:
Yeah, I get how it burns the valves. But wouldn't that heat the outgoing exhaust to? The O2 sensor determine the A/F ratio based on the temerature of the Exhaust gas, so it seems to me it'd richen the mixture whic DUH! damnit I just realized would't do **** to stop the burning valves. But, there's another downside, baad gas mileage de to the computer richening up what it thinks is a lean mix. Maybe? The computer only runs in closed loop at cruise? I thought they only did one or the other.
Click to expand...


The O2 sensor doesn't measure HEAT...It's called an O2 sensor because it measures the amount of carbon dioxide in the exhaust (I think. Unless it just directly measures the amount of oxygen). At any rate that is how it regulates fuel.
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
May 17, 2004
#32
  • May 17, 2004
  • #32
unless I have been misinformed greatly (which is quite possible). [edit] I have been, it uses a certain material that measure "the partial pressure of oxygen in the mixture"
Link

I stand corrected and apologise for any misinformation I may have spread.
 

ib_steed

Member
Aug 13, 2003
203
0
16
Sunnyvale, CA
May 17, 2004
#33
  • May 17, 2004
  • #33
I ran my 2.3N/A motor with a longtube headman header (two piece) and 2.5 exhaust w/ cat & high flow muffler. It was a decent sound. Then my header came apart at the collector, the tubes still lined up, so it wasnt completely open, but just that was enough to make it sound like a V8, and make a rather nice sounding explosion on in-gear decel. yummy!

It was very loud though, and i was lucky i was not pulled over for it. I got a lot of looks from people while i was driving, that included a few cops that were going the other direction at a stoplight. It also leaked exhaust gas into the cabin, and made me lightheaded after city driving for about 30 mins.

Overall, it was a nice experience, but not what i would want all the time! too much!

-Ryan
 

kiddiccarus

The first widely accepted Tranny
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 24, 2003
1,789
1,051
143
30 Mins from a Ragged GT
May 17, 2004
#34
  • May 17, 2004
  • #34
header vs ported e6 anyone?????? This is not going to turn into one of those threads is it?

Hey listen to the men who have no muffler hence nomuffler and corvax
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
May 18, 2004
#35
  • May 18, 2004
  • #35
C-R-O-V-A-X
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 21, 2004
#36
  • May 21, 2004
  • #36
http://www.exhaustsoundclips.com/sound/ford_mustang_2.3_1991_openexhuast.mp3 I hope it didn't sound anything like this 91 2.3 that is just labeled as open exhaust
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
May 21, 2004
#37
  • May 21, 2004
  • #37
Yup, that's exactly what it sounds like. Of course, it sounds better when you actually get on it.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 21, 2004
#38
  • May 21, 2004
  • #38
93GreenLX said:
http://www.exhaustsoundclips.com/sound/ford_mustang_2.3_1991_openexhuast.mp3 I hope it didn't sound anything like this 91 2.3 that is just labeled as open exhaust
Click to expand...

It sounds fair from being American to me
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 21, 2004
#39
  • May 21, 2004
  • #39
Yeah and definitely not what I want to sound like
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 21, 2004
#40
  • May 21, 2004
  • #40
93GreenLX said:
Yeah and definitely not what I want to sound like
Click to expand...

Man if my 93' LX sounded like that I would...Umm wait it does sound like that Ya I didn't mean for my to turn out like that either, I just told the guy put a cheap muffler on that had more flow than a stocker. I also left off that pre-cat deal next to the mainifold and used a high flow cat.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Exhaust set up
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
556
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
AeroCoupe
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
577
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
646
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Thursday at 8:50 AM
keel
J
4 bank eliminator chip
  • JJ's90fox
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
145
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
Engine Tuning...?
  • justadude07
  • May 30, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
219
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 6, 2026
Blown88GT
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?