• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Effects of running no exhaust

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93GreenLX
  • Start date Start date May 16, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
May 21, 2004
#41
  • May 21, 2004
  • #41
You will not burn the exhaust valves with a pacesetter header only...won't hurt a damn thing except your ears...
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
May 23, 2004
#42
  • May 23, 2004
  • #42
bhuff30 said:
loss of hearing
multitude of tickets
pissed off neighbors
no girlfriend or friends
burnt exhaust valves
Click to expand...


Backpressure doesn't give you more power. What really happens is, as long as the exhaust stream is contained within a tube, the energy of the exhaust pulses is harnessed to draw along the exhaust charge as a whole. It's possible to actually slow your car down by removing parts of the exhaust without making more power, or making the exhaust too large, or a combination of both. Expanding gas that explodes out of the cylinder as soon as the valve cracks, and does no more work, is wasted power. Yet the backpressure of too restrictive an exhaust is also harmful. So you strive to acheive the perfect balance of high exhaust velocity and low backpressure...

Exhaust pulse energy is why long tube headers make such a difference, because there is no destructive interference between cylinders as in a manifold or short header, but rather each cylinder's exhaust energy works to leave a vaccuum in its wake which more completely scavenges the cylinder.
 
L

lit_mike_2001

New Member
Jan 25, 2003
163
1
0
Ada, OK
May 25, 2004
#43
  • May 25, 2004
  • #43
93GreenLX said:
http://www.exhaustsoundclips.com/sound/ford_mustang_2.3_1991_openexhuast.mp3 I hope it didn't sound anything like this 91 2.3 that is just labeled as open exhaust
Click to expand...

It wasnt actually a completely open exhaust. If i remember right it had a short peice of exhaust pipe on it cut off right before the first cat. The little pipe made one hell of a difference too, the sound that a 2.3 makes with an open manifold is just unbearable.

A peice of advice to you guys wanting to run an open header... don't. that **** gets old quicklike. You'll be spending money on a new exhaust before you know it
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 25, 2004
#44
  • May 25, 2004
  • #44
Is dumping it right after the muffler really going to make that much of a difference?
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 25, 2004
#45
  • May 25, 2004
  • #45
93GreenLX said:
Is dumping it right after the muffler really going to make that much of a difference?
Click to expand...

In my opinion No. I haven't seen or heard of any benifits from doing this other than making it louder and harder to get inspected.
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 25, 2004
#46
  • May 25, 2004
  • #46
So it will be louder and sound pretty much the same tone is what your saying? Hmmmmmm..I want it to be louder and a little more raspy. Don't care about inspection
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 25, 2004
#47
  • May 25, 2004
  • #47
93GreenLX said:
So it will be louder and sound pretty much the same tone is what your saying? Hmmmmmm..I want it to be louder and a little more raspy. Don't care about inspection
Click to expand...

Umm...not sure if it will sound good or not on a 2.3L(T). You could always leave the tail pice off and if it sux put a tail pip on One more thing sometimes it resonates bad inside the car without a tail pipe.
 

93GreenLX

Founding Member
Aug 22, 2002
776
0
0
Southern Maryland
May 25, 2004
#48
  • May 25, 2004
  • #48
I would run a short 90 degree pipe no matter what I do so that the fumes wouldn't be so bad. I just want it ti be louder without being ricey, that's all
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 25, 2004
#49
  • May 25, 2004
  • #49
93GreenLX said:
I would run a short 90 degree pipe no matter what I do so that the fumes wouldn't be so bad. I just want it ti be louder without being ricey, that's all
Click to expand...

What I mean is dumping the exhaust before the rear axle at the muffler could cause a ton of noise inside the car. I'm not sure how bad a 4cl is but I would die before I even ride in a V8 thats been done this way The best thing to ddo is try it would and if its good than run with it and if its not put a tail pipe on it.
 

Ray III

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
586
0
0
fixin Boomhower's John Deere in Troy, NY
May 25, 2004
#50
  • May 25, 2004
  • #50
when I installed my Flowmaster, I had to leave off my LX 5.0 tailpipe till I could get around to adapting it. I drove it around like that for months but it only took about a week before it was severely aggravating me. It won't make you go deaf but it is freaking loud and sometimes the interior resonance under full load vibrates your eardrums at such a high frequency that it hurts. And it stank, and looked like ass because my tailpipe was missing. (think redneck)

I have the pipe on now as God intended and it looks/sounds sooooo much better, the FART sound is completely gone and replaced with a smooth loud exhaust tone. And yes you do lose a little torque taking that pipe off, but probably not enough to notice.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
May 25, 2004
#51
  • May 25, 2004
  • #51
Ray III said:
when I installed my Flowmaster, I had to leave off my LX 5.0 tailpipe till I could get around to adapting it. I drove it around like that for months but it only took about a week before it was severely aggravating me. It won't make you go deaf but it is freaking loud and sometimes the interior resonance under full load vibrates your eardrums at such a high frequency that it hurts. And it stank, and looked like ass because my tailpipe was missing. (think redneck)

I have the pipe on now as God intended and it looks/sounds sooooo much better, the FART sound is completely gone and replaced with a smooth loud exhaust tone. And yes you do lose a little torque taking that pipe off, but probably not enough to notice.
Click to expand...

Thanks I was wondering if someone had done a 4cl this way. I've been in V8 were you go insane with it killing your eardrums and have to yell to the person beside you. Now these where cars without a "X" or "H" pipe which helps out a lot but you really can't do that on a four banger.

As for looks goes, I would rather someone run duels on these cars than no tail pipe and a single muffler hanging down under tha car
 
B

blastit116

New Member
Oct 3, 2003
174
0
0
jupiter,florida
Jun 2, 2004
#52
  • Jun 2, 2004
  • #52
well right now i am running with just cats and a pipe that goes about 2 feet off the cat i have noticed more hp with it like this and it aint that loud at all
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Exhaust set up
  • dropteeth
  • Sep 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
559
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 24, 2025
AeroCoupe
Engine Keeping O2 sensors lit with long tube headers
  • keel
  • Thursday at 8:44 AM
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
96
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Thursday at 7:06 PM
AeroCoupe
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
580
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
652
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Thursday at 8:50 AM
keel
J
4 bank eliminator chip
  • JJ's90fox
  • Feb 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
145
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?