• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

EFI benefits with Carb appearance?

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxxfish
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 20, 2005
#41
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #41
that depends on the engine really, they also made a 600 cfm version for the hi-po 289's and the the rest of the big ford line, like t-birds and galaxies and such with the 390, 428, 410 etc. or you could go with one of pony carbs "spreadbore" 4100's that is made from a 600 but has the front venturi made smaller to match 470 front venturi resulting in a spreadbore style carb. it's like a 580 cfm carb after that mod. will work well with stock and mild motors and can probably handle slightly more than mild. but you're right it won't handle a .600 lift cam, that's for sure.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Aug 20, 2005
#42
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #42
I've got a late model mustang for all the daily driver reliability I could ever want. My classic will always have a carb. The engine compartment looks better, I'll put my 67 up against the 2005 any day, and those side-draft 5.0s are simply FUGLY. As far as performance goes, my carbureated 351W will DESTROY the EFI in my '67, and for less money. Then there's the sound department, never heard an NA EFI that didn't sound like my Honda, exhaust can overpwoer the sewing machine sound but in the induction department they are not in the same league.
Click to expand...
You may not like the truth but banging your head against that little brick wall has apparetnly caused some damage.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 20, 2005
#43
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #43
edbert, i think the whole point of this thread was to find an efi unit that looks like the stock carb with the air cleaner installed. that's why i recommended the holley pro-jection system, it is more stealthy in appearance than an MPFI system. but yeah i agree that that the stock 5.0 style intake is pretty ugly.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Aug 20, 2005
#44
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #44
bnickel said:
edbert, i think the whole point of this thread was to find an efi unit that looks like the stock carb with the air cleaner installed. that's why i recommended the holley pro-jection system, it is more stealthy in appearance than an MPFI system. but yeah i agree that that the stock 5.0 style intake is pretty ugly.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I agree and I should not have hijacked it even if that was not my intent. But sticking to the subject of a carb-look inhjection system...

Isn't there a mechanical injection setup on the market with a center mounted arrangement? A buddy of mine has a '67 Vette with mechanical injection and he has a air cleaner in the middle too, it has that wonderful "sucking" sound kind of like a carb (although not as loud) yet also has the wonderful music of the mechanical injectors which remind me a little of the solid lifter orchestra from the K-code.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Aug 20, 2005
#45
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #45
i'm not aware of any mechanical injection system on the market right now other than the hilborn system. got any ideas on what it's called.
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Aug 20, 2005
#46
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #46
Edbert said:
I've got a late model mustang for all the daily driver reliability I could ever want. My classic will always have a carb. The engine compartment looks better, I'll put my 67 up against the 2005 any day, and those side-draft 5.0s are simply FUGLY. As far as performance goes, my carbureated 351W will DESTROY the EFI in my '67, and for less money. Then there's the sound department, never heard an NA EFI that didn't sound like my Honda, exhaust can overpwoer the sewing machine sound but in the induction department they are not in the same league.

You may not like the truth but banging your head against that little brick wall has apparetnly caused some damage.
Click to expand...

LOL....
You need to go listen to some good running five liters then... there is nothing sewing machine about them. Mine for example has a nice lope at 900rpm. And thanks to the 1.75 ceramic headers, Bassani X, and cat back there is no sewing machine involved.... Now as for fugly under the hood, 1. when youre looking at my taillights you dont see whats under the hood 2. the powdercoated trickflow intake, alloy heads, and CnL / Sabresport intake tube look pretty good (imho)

If you don't like injection thats fine... there are lotts of guys who aren't into it either cuz they dont understand it, dont know how to tune it, resistant to change, etc... and thats fine, its their thing. But dont mistake your own perception of things as "the truth". The "truth" is relative to your point of view....

I myself run a holley on my fastback, but will be converting it over to mpi with an accel tb and a set of about 36lb-ers. But first I have to decide if I want to go with another eec4 and a tweecer, or a new AEM set-up.... or maybe a used DFI. I dont know, havent decided yet, but rest assured it will run great ice cold or boiling hot (which carbs dont) from death valley to denver, and will have good emissions and great power doing it.

Best of luck to you,
Dave-
 

ddonaca351

Active Member
Dec 1, 2002
2,055
1
48
Camas Washington
Aug 20, 2005
#47
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #47
bnickel said:
i'm not aware of any mechanical injection system on the market right now other than the hilborn system. got any ideas on what it's called.
Click to expand...

I think the old mech inj on the stingrays was made by rotten-chester....

DD
 
M

MitchGT

Member
Apr 1, 2005
204
0
17
Aug 20, 2005
#48
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #48
I'm running the Edelbrock Pro-Flo efi setup, and the only reason it doesn't look like a carb setup is that you can see about 3 inches of fuel rail on each side, and there are a few extra wires going to the engine. It runs great, it wasn't all that hard to install, it is programmable(comes with its own hand held programmer that stays in the car),and it looks waaaay better than the long runner 5.0 setups. It might have a little less torque than the long runner settups, but the runners are fairly straight to the ports. the only problem is that the runners neck down to stock head port size, so I am going to have to port the manifold when I take the engine apart next. Other than that I'm happy with it. A carb would have been cheaper though....( then again the efi setup included alot of parts, like the pump, distributer, fuel lines, etc, that you would end up upgrading eventually anyways.)
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
J
New to Mustangs/Fords
  • Joradan93Foxbody
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
138
The Welcome Wagon Mar 2, 2026
Joradan93Foxbody
J
G
Fox engine swaps
  • Gravity
  • Aug 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
387
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
887
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?