• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine rebuild kit questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter 86lxhatch
  • Start date Start date Dec 22, 2011

86lxhatch

Active Member
Nov 14, 2011
113
0
26
East Tennessee
Dec 22, 2011
#1
  • Dec 22, 2011
  • #1
I am using this rebuild kit from summit for my 306:

Sealed Power CSMHP799-311 - Federal Mogul Premium Engine Rebuild Kits

​
This is my planned set up:​
​
holley 600 cfm carb​
edelbrock performer rpm air gap intake​
stock C5ae 58cc heads​
roller rockers​
b303 cam​
​
When I researched the kit, it showed I would get 10.13:1 comp. ratio with a 58cc head. I would like a lot of compression as this will remain a nat. aspirated motor, but was wondering if I should use the head gaskets that came with the kit, or go with a different thickness to increase my comp. ratio?​
​
I would like to see around 260 rwhp, is it possible with this set up?​
​
​
​
​
​
​
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 23, 2011
#2
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #2
Pretty sure that is a Fel-Pro headgasket included which is going to be about .041" compressed, which gives a decent quench area...leave that alone. If you want to increase the compression I would mill the heads a little more. The stock heads are going to truly limt the power and your looking for about 70hp over a stock motor, I dont think that will happen with out some major cyl head work or an aftermarket head.

It says the kit is a flat top with no valve reliefs, is that true.... if so the 10.1 is correct. If you mill the heads to 56cc it will be 10.38:1

Do you already have all the parts?
 

86lxhatch

Active Member
Nov 14, 2011
113
0
26
East Tennessee
Dec 23, 2011
#3
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #3
yes, I already have the parts. The kit said flat tops with no reliefs, but what it came with was flat tops with 4 valve reliefs...also, I haven't done anything with the heads as of yet. I found some RHS heads (used) on craigslist for $400, but I think the combustion chambers will be way to large.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 23, 2011
#4
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #4
What is the PT# of the piston it came with? I can tell you comp ratio. The RHS heads would be a great addition, alum or iron?
 

86lxhatch

Active Member
Nov 14, 2011
113
0
26
East Tennessee
Dec 23, 2011
#5
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #5
pistons are summit part #
​
SLP-L2488F30​

the heads are irons. I am building on a low budget, so I am looking for used parts when I can find good deals...

Still undecided on the heads though. I don't want to sink a lot of money in my current heads trying to make them perform like performance heads, when I could just keep looking to find some good, used performance heads that are ready to go. Thanks Rick for the info.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 23, 2011
#6
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #6
They are 2cc reliefs so your looking at 9.85:1 with a 58cc head

The RHS is a good choice
 

86lxhatch

Active Member
Nov 14, 2011
113
0
26
East Tennessee
Dec 23, 2011
#7
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #7
Thanks for the help. Do you think that if I go with the larger heads, it'll make more power with the lower comp. ratio, or am I better off with smaller heads and more compression? This car will be used for road racing and scca events, not for drag racing.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 23, 2011
#8
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #8
A custom cam could take care of smoothing out the curve for the combo, b303 isnt the best choice IMO but Ive never been a bog Ford Racing cam fan. I would keep as much compression in it as you can, you culd always mill the RHS chambers down a little.
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Dec 23, 2011
#9
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #9
I ran that exact kit the first time I built my 306....the pistons stuck about +0.010 - 0.015 out of the hole because their compression height was too tall. Block had only been trued up...no material removed. So that might be something you want to check into when you factor your compression ratio.

I went with some SRP's and never looked back....much lighter.

Speed Pro's = 1.619 compression height.
SRP's = 1.600

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SRP-138734/
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Dec 23, 2011
#10
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #10
He's correct in a perfect world those pistons will be .009" out of a 8.20"deck... Factory decks are all over the place, have it measured before any machine work is done. You may want to return that kit and go another route.
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Dec 23, 2011
#11
  • Dec 23, 2011
  • #11
I found out when my dial gauge kept trying to fall off the deck when I turned the motor over.
 

86lxhatch

Active Member
Nov 14, 2011
113
0
26
East Tennessee
Dec 24, 2011
#12
  • Dec 24, 2011
  • #12
I measured the distance between the top of the deck and top dead center of the pistons and came up with roughly .007-.009, using a good straight edge and feeler gauges. Rick is right, the factory decks do seem to be all over the place, and nowhere near perfect. The pistons do have the valve reliefs, so I'm thinking they will be okay, so long as I don't go overbored with shaving the heads, or run a ridiculously high lift cam. I will definitely have to go with the clay method to check ptv clearance once I get some heads, but are my rough measurements in tolerance to keep building?
 

Jason 302

10 Year Member
Aug 9, 2003
685
71
68
Newark, Ohio
Dec 24, 2011
#13
  • Dec 24, 2011
  • #13
I ran those pistons with stock heads and a TFS #1 cam and didn't have any clearance problems. Running a 1.90 or 2.02 valve might be a different story though. I personally prefer the dummy valve spring method for checking PTV clearance as I think it's more accurate.
 

Boydster

5 Year Member
Apr 10, 2011
301
20
39
Maryville, Tenn
Dec 24, 2011
#14
  • Dec 24, 2011
  • #14
I got my springs for checking PTV clearance from Ace Hardware. They have drawers full of all kinds of springs. All you need is one of about the same diameter, and yeah, they're nice and light but strong enuf to hold the valve closed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
878
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
284
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
990
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Engine An engine building combo with stock Speed Density (SD) system
  • Mcmahst
  • Jan 14, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
976
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 15, 2025
Mcmahst
J
68 Mustang with Foxbody Engine Stalling Issues - MSPNP2
  • JayV68Stang
  • Mar 13, 2025
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
3
Views
451
Digital Self-tuning Forum Mar 13, 2025
JayV68Stang
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?