• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Equal Length headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter Matts89LX5.0
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Mar 18, 2004
#21
  • Mar 18, 2004
  • #21
Long tubes are def the way to go...but rite now i have equal lengths and a matching hi flow h pipe and i won't have to spend any money at the moment for new exhaust
 
R

redterror302

Founding Member
Jun 29, 2002
895
0
0
Mertztown, PA or State College, PA
Mar 19, 2004
#22
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #22
Just one thing you need to remember though, those tests is 5.0 Mustang is for a 347 stroker, not a stock 5.0. So you may have different results from what was stated in the article itself.
 
S

Schlodes

Founding Member
Feb 26, 2001
354
0
0
Lidsville.... West side dawg..
Mar 19, 2004
#23
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #23
For a motor up to about 275 HP [at the flywheel] leave the stock headers there. Maybe take em off and hog out the welds or something, other than that on a stockish or mild bolt on engine you wont see much gain HP or TQ wise.
 

84blkstang

Member
Jun 4, 2003
544
1
18
Springfield MO
Mar 19, 2004
#24
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #24
What I dont understand is why they do all of these tests with hellacious motors. Why cant they do them with a mild 5.0, not a 347 stroker with a .600 lift cam and huge brodix heads? This seems pointless to me because I am a college student and I dont have the money to build a motor like this, as much as I want to. Why cant they take mild motor with like an e-cam (or somthing similar) and TF heads(or somthign close) that is halfway affordable. I know they are trying to get the parts to perform at peak, I just dont understand, sorry for the ranting but I had to say somthing.
 

whitemustang89

Member
Dec 15, 2003
166
0
17
in the sticks of arkansas
Mar 19, 2004
#25
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #25
84blkstang said:
What I dont understand is why they do all of these tests with hellacious motors. Why cant they do them with a mild 5.0, not a 347 stroker with a .600 lift cam and huge brodix heads? This seems pointless to me because I am a college student and I dont have the money to build a motor like this, as much as I want to. Why cant they take mild motor with like an e-cam (or somthing similar) and TF heads(or somthign close) that is halfway affordable. I know they are trying to get the parts to perform at peak, I just dont understand, sorry for the ranting but I had to say somthing.
Click to expand...

im with you on this one im still in high school. it would be nice to see them test a person with an average budget could build and for the headers GET LONG TUBES!!!!!!!
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,597
223
Northern KY
Mar 19, 2004
#26
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #26
LTs are the way to go, and i'm honestly sick of hearing about this MMFF article about ELs being the best. No flame intended to everyone who's bringing it up, but it's just BS. Look at the curve under the hp peak if you want the full story. Even if it were a 10hp increase to have ELs over LTs, the powerband for LTs is higher accross the board.
 

DCjuggalo

Member
May 18, 2003
169
0
16
Charlotte, NC
Mar 19, 2004
#27
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #27
long tubes sound soooooo much better
 

Michael Yount

Mustang Master
Apr 10, 2002
9,039
6
79
Charlotte, NC
Mar 19, 2004
#28
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #28
Most people also report that long tubes significantly reduce the dreaded "drone".
 
M

Matts89LX5.0

Founding Member
Nov 1, 2002
1,314
0
36
Long Island, NY
Mar 19, 2004
#29
  • Mar 19, 2004
  • #29
Long Tubes definitely sound really good on exhaust systems. I just happen to have a set of Equal Lengths sitting in my garage.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
77
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
T
408w pushrods
  • Towegage
  • Sep 19, 2025
  • Fox Engine Swaparoo
Replies
5
Views
247
Fox Engine Swaparoo Sep 19, 2025
Noobz347
M
Gt40p headers
  • Mike3
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
13
Views
662
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 1, 2025
Blackhawkxx
Gt40 e303 combo questions
  • 99mustanggt2018
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
405
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Mar 30, 2025
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?