• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Finally ran the new 347 combo at the track

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grn92LX
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 11, 2005
#1
  • Nov 11, 2005
  • #1
I headed out to englishtown tonight with my buddy Matt. I haven't drag raced at a track in probably 2 years so I was so friggin rusty! I made 3 passes and my best pass was my first one. I went 12.56 @ 115. My launches suck and I shifted into 2nd too soon on this run and when I hit second I felt it slightly bog. I hit a 1.996 60' on that pass which is pretty shiity. 1/8 mile was 8.2 @ 91. My race weight was 3260.

There is so much more in this combo with driving, hooking, proper rear gear and finding out the ideal shift point.

It just sucks that I have to drive into friggin NJ to race :Track: Its so out of the way and i'm not able to go there enough to become consistent with my launching/driving. Oh well, that was my baseline pass.

Mike
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Nov 11, 2005
#2
  • Nov 11, 2005
  • #2
Shakedowns always suck..but glad to see you got it to the track..115mph is movin for N/A..a easy 11sec ride with some improvment

Chris
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 12, 2005
#3
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #3
The mph is low for the combo but like I said, my launching needs lot of work. I haven't done this in a long time. I was gunning for around 120. I lost a bit of time that pass in my first to second shift. I shifted too soon and the car sorta bogged as it hit second. Between that and a better launch i'd have hit my goal for the night I think.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Nov 12, 2005
#4
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #4
what tires, I think you coulda hit 117mph easy
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 12, 2005
#5
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #5
Way to go Mike

Mid 12's and 115 for a baseline 1/4 mile pass

You gotta be pleased

Its nothin but better from this point on

Grady
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 12, 2005
#6
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #6
Chris, I run on nitto drag radials on my pony wheels.

Grady, no i'm not pleased, but at the same time i'm not pissed either. It was nice to get a baseline, but I was hoping for closer to 120 mph. Like I said, my launching and shifting needs work.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Nov 12, 2005
#7
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #7
Glad to see you finally got to the track.

It makes you realize how impressive Paul's runs are with low 12's and 302 N/A.

RC
 

94CobraPace

Founding Member
Aug 30, 2000
907
1
0
Houston, Tx.
Nov 12, 2005
#8
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #8
Not bad for shake down pass. Don't worry, you know the problem, need more practice.
At least nothing broke!!
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 12, 2005
#9
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #9
Not a bad baseline Mike! Just think, my first shakedown passes with my car resulted in a 13.6 at 103 and you know where I went from there! 115 for the first time out, being rusty, not knowing ideal launch and shift points, etc is NOT bad. Good luck!


BTW- how far are you from Cecil County dragway? I'm here right now for a private track rental and this track is FAST. I know E-town is fast but from some I have spoke with they think its quicker here. Its a 4.5hr drive for us, but its worth it IMO for the time capability and track prep here.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 12, 2005
#10
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #10
Cecil is in maryland right? I'm not sure, but its probably quite a ride from here.

I jus checked out my datalog and I noticed I was running a tad bit too rich. Another big thing killer me (besidfes my launching) was my tiny 3.73's. I believe I was crossing the traps under 6,000 rpm, probably around 5,800. Thats almost 1,000 rpm's lower than where it should be.

I guess its not too bad of a baseline considering all the things that need improving but I was hoping for more.
 

gmkillr

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
606
1
18
Nov 12, 2005
#11
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #11
Throw some 4.10's in there.
Nice combo BTW!!
 

Pops Fun

10 Year Member
Feb 15, 2003
961
14
59
Cincinnati, Ohio
Nov 12, 2005
#12
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #12
Congrat's for getting to the track.. Have Fun that is what it is all about
 
Y

yellow1995Cobra

New Member
Dec 23, 2002
2,959
2
0
Massachusetts
Nov 12, 2005
#13
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #13
Good start mike!

I like the MPH for sure.. What changes you gonna make for next year?

You have it on Vid ?
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 12, 2005
#14
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #14
No vids, sorry. Mentally picture a slow Mustang with a bad driver, thats my run

As for changes, i'm thinking of pulling the heads soon and upgrading to arp head and manifold studs and sending the heads to Ed C for a good valve job.

I'd also like to do 4.30 gears and 31 spline crap in the rear with a better tire.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Nov 12, 2005
#15
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #15
Not bad at all. The MPH is nice and it will improve in time. Congrats.
 

4Jenna

Founding Member
Sep 12, 2001
4,326
6
69
AZ
Nov 12, 2005
#16
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #16
Just think that Vortech woulda went 120mph
 

Joes95GT

New Member
Jan 23, 2003
3,132
1
0
Delaware
Nov 13, 2005
#17
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #17
Michael. You suck and you're a horrible driver.

Just kidding man - thats really not bad at all for a street tired car. The car definitely needs more gear but I could see a 3.73 getting you into the 11's with a little more time.

And, Cecil is running about 3-tenths faster than E-town - I just spend the day at Cecil last friday. Verrazano to NJ Turnpike all the way down to 95. From 95 it should be about 25 minutes into MD. It's the first exit in Maryland once you pass the toll both. I think.........

Joe
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 13, 2005
#18
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #18
Joes95GT said:
Michael. You suck and you're a horrible driver.

Just kidding man - thats really not bad at all for a street tired car. The car definitely needs more gear but I could see a 3.73 getting you into the 11's with a little more time.

And, Cecil is running about 3-tenths faster than E-town - I just spend the day at Cecil last friday. Verrazano to NJ Turnpike all the way down to 95. From 95 it should be about 25 minutes into MD. It's the first exit in Maryland once you pass the toll both. I think.........

Joe
Click to expand...

Yes Joseph, I suck :Zip2: BTW, you going to be visiting Hofstra this year anytime soon?

I think i'm going to skip on the head work and put that money towards doing up my rear. I'm looking @ doing the ford racing 31 spline posi unit, 31 spline axles (brand?) ford racing 4.30 gears and maybe a girdle with a drain plug.

I do plan to pull the heads and swap to arp manifold/head studs and I am also going to have the lower manifold milled to match better. Just gotta figure out exactly how to measure how much I need to mill?
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Nov 13, 2005
#19
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #19
Grn92LX said:
As for changes, i'm thinking of pulling the heads soon and upgrading to arp head and manifold studs and sending the heads to Ed C for a good valve job.
Click to expand...

Hey, did you end up talking to Ed about the valve job? I'd be curious to see what he tells you.
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Nov 13, 2005
#20
  • Nov 13, 2005
  • #20
zenboy99 said:
Hey, did you end up talking to Ed about the valve job? I'd be curious to see what he tells you.
Click to expand...

Yes, I emailed him that night after you and I spoke through Email. He said a good valve job and bowl work are where my money is best spent. He said I can go crazy but it becomes a lot of money for a little gain. Im not sure what he meant by that but I assume when he said "go crazy" he meant a full port job.

EDIT: He was also talking about milling the heads and a new valve train + assembly and cleaning. Also new valve depending what shape the old ones are in. All said and done, its just WAY too much money. A simple valve job would end up turning into a $1,000 deal. That $1,000 I can spend on FULLY doing my rear.

I think my money overall on my car is best spent doing up the rear end and putting a better tire on it rather than adding more power.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
52
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 9, 2025
from6to8
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
293
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
  • Locked
Engine Might have to get a Dart block but don't want to and if I do, then 363 instead of 331. Thoughts on what I've already bought so far.......
  • from6to8
  • Jul 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
497
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 8, 2025
Noobz347
A
2001 Mustang GT, scorched metal smell and noise from trans/diff?
  • AndyE2255
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
455
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Dec 28, 2025
gkomo
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?