• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Flowmaster Exhaust Currently Too Quiet !?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Btrainfiveoh
  • Start date Start date Aug 8, 2015
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Aug 12, 2015
#21
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #21
You seem to have a plan and pretty much know what you want so I'm not going to bore you with the "go aluminum" rant. Should be a fun street car when your all done. 3.55's with a manual transmission should be very user friendly while still waking up the car. I just went from 3.08's to 3.73's (again) and I'm very happy but I also do very little freeway driving (more like never).
 
Reactions: A5literMan

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Aug 12, 2015
#22
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #22
I've had 3.55's twice and presently run 73's. Either one are good for what you're talking about. Don't be afraid of the 73's they hardly change your mpg and cruise rpm fwiw.
 
Reactions: Btrainfiveoh

Btrainfiveoh

Member
Jul 25, 2015
81
13
18
Aug 12, 2015
#23
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #23
FoxMustangLvr said:
Glad to hear that your happy with the sound and performance. Please ditch the 87 octane and spring for the 92 octane to go with the 13* timing.
Click to expand...
I have no detonation with runnin 13* on 87 octane... I've heard you want to run the least amount of octane at the max timing advance without detonation for max power.
 

Btrainfiveoh

Member
Jul 25, 2015
81
13
18
Aug 12, 2015
#24
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #24
FoxMustangLvr said:
You seem to have a plan and pretty much know what you want so I'm not going to bore you with the "go aluminum" rant. Should be a fun street car when your all done. 3.55's with a manual transmission should be very user friendly while still waking up the car. I just went from 3.08's to 3.73's (again) and I'm very happy but I also do very little freeway driving (more like never).
Click to expand...
Yeah I know aluminum heads is deff the way to go, but trying to keep it budget friendly. Aluminum heads here after I'm said and done are going to run me 2500... Porting the stockers with the valve spring change... 3-500 tops. Obviously I won't make the same performance gains, but like you said... With gears and that work, it should be a fun street car. 3.55 to 3.73 that's what I'm torn between right now, I deff do hwy driving ...
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Aug 12, 2015
#25
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #25
You probably would like 3.55's the best. If I remember right they cruise around 2100 rpm's on interstate. 73's are around 23-2400 at 70-75mph
 
Reactions: Btrainfiveoh

FoxMustangLvr

I love my Pimp
SN Certified Technician
Oct 14, 2012
4,968
3,514
204
Spokane, Wa
Aug 12, 2015
#26
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #26
$2,500 for aluminum heads? Where are you at?

Also, I've never heard of low octane doing anything to increase power especially when advancing timing. What is your source?
 

Btrainfiveoh

Member
Jul 25, 2015
81
13
18
Aug 12, 2015
#27
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #27
FoxMustangLvr said:
$2,500 for aluminum heads? Where are you at?

Also, I've never heard of low octane doing anything to increase power especially when advancing timing. What is your source?
Click to expand...
The shop I've gotten some work done from. Mopac (out here in canada, BC) and afr heads or trickflow heads are about 2000-2400, add in pushrods, lifters, rocker arms... As for the octane rating, I was told if it's not detonating there's no point in adding octane. They build street car to strip cars.
 

squeak93

15 Year Member
Jun 2, 2005
2,276
367
164
Joplin, Missouri
Aug 12, 2015
#28
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #28
Run premium if advanced timing. Trying to skirt by with low octane fuel and "pray" it doesn't ping is just a recipe for disaster.

Use good branded 91 octane and keep the timing around 13-14 (on a stock car there is no benefit to getting every degree you can).
 

Btrainfiveoh

Member
Jul 25, 2015
81
13
18
Aug 12, 2015
#29
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #29
squeak93 said:
Run premium if advanced timing. Trying to skirt by with low octane fuel and "pray" it doesn't ping is just a recipe for disaster.

Use good branded 91 octane and keep the timing around 13-14 (on a stock car there is no benefit to getting every degree you can).
Click to expand...
Hmm, that's odd as why I'm getting so many mixed opinions. I was told by them you'll actually decrease performance if you advance timing to 12-13 and run 91, the goal is to run the highest timing with the lowest octane (87) safely. If it's detonating, turn back on the timing. And as of right now, there's no pinging or detonation... Mind you I have no issue running 91, I was just told that with a stock 5.0 it doesn't make sense... Now if the compression was changed or timing was advanced 14-16 then yes, 91 octane is required otherwise there'll be detonation. But I'm curious to know what others say as well. If it is true, then I'd like to go back to that shop and find how why and how they recommend that. Considering, like I said, they build and work on countless street/strip cars. There one of the only good speciality shops in the area that don't charge a stupid amount just because of their name.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Aug 12, 2015
#30
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #30
I agree w/ your shop. The primary function of higher octane is to slow down the burn rate of the fuel. Commensurately, 91, or 93 octane gasoline is slower to combust than 87, and as a result lower efficiency.

Lower efficiency, less power , blah, blah, blah.

Now, as to how much difference can be gained by better octane and bumped timing over stock timing and standard 87 octane, I can't comment.

This is typically a larger problem when considering going to the next level where 93 is barely adequate, and race fuels (100 octane or higher) become the alternative .
 
Reactions: Btrainfiveoh

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Aug 12, 2015
#31
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #31
I always so better performance with 13-15* timing and 91-93 octane fuel. I've ran 12-13* on 87 without any problems though(but remember you can't always hear detonation)
 
Reactions: Btrainfiveoh

cobra10494

Founding Member
May 14, 2000
206
22
29
North Jersey
Aug 12, 2015
#32
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #32
Why bump the timing and run 87?????
 

Btrainfiveoh

Member
Jul 25, 2015
81
13
18
Aug 12, 2015
#33
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #33
cobra10494 said:
Why bump the timing and run 87?????
Click to expand...
Because, like I said, according to the shop, can't remember his exact words but basically he said if you're bumping the timing up a bit and adding a higher octane fuel, you're contradicting it... You won't make a gain. You want to bump the timing a bit over stock and be able to use the same octane fuel the car was meant to run on(87) ... That's where you'll get max performance. Stock timing is 10* on these, so running 13 shouldn't be too big of a deal, but after hearing so many people say put premium if you're advancing timing it's got me all confused.
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Aug 12, 2015
#34
  • Aug 12, 2015
  • #34
Btrainfiveoh said:
Because, like I said, according to the shop, can't remember his exact words but basically he said if you're bumping the timing up a bit and adding a higher octane fuel, you're contradicting it... You won't make a gain. You want to bump the timing a bit over stock and be able to use the same octane fuel the car was meant to run on(87) ... That's where you'll get max performance. Stock timing is 10* on these, so running 13 shouldn't be too big of a deal, but after hearing so many people say put premium if you're advancing timing it's got me all confused.
Click to expand...

The reason you need to run premium fuels these days is mostly due to the ethanol added, which effectively lowers the octane rating. Two fuels with the same octane rating but one blended with ethanol will have worse performance and not support as much timing in my experience. It also depends on the compression of the engine. A higher compression motor requires more octane as well.
 
Reactions: Btrainfiveoh
S

Stang D

Member
Jan 23, 2006
122
6
18
Quad Cities, Iowa
Aug 16, 2015
#35
  • Aug 16, 2015
  • #35
Don't be afraid of 3.73s. I ran them for years before my 4.10s went in. You can still get very good mpg with a 5 speed and 3.73s There is no better performance mod than gears IMO.
 
Reactions: Btrainfiveoh
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Exhaust
  • GoldenRuleClassics
  • Apr 21, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
253
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 21, 2025
2000xp8
M
My numbers sound right?
  • MiltP
  • Feb 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
764
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 2, 2026
MiltP
M
G
Quiet my 2015 GT on the cheap
  • gsrblack
  • Feb 12, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
6
Views
768
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Apr 16, 2025
gkomo
R
For Sale 2008 Mustang Bullitt for sale Richmond Hill, ON, Canada L4C 0S3
  • ROHDRNNR
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14)
Replies
0
Views
126
S197 Mustangs For Sale (2005-14) Jun 10, 2026
ROHDRNNR
R
C
Hello from Alabama
  • Carl Moore
  • Sep 6, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
321
The Welcome Wagon Sep 7, 2025
Mac131
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?