• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

flowmaster mufflers

  • Thread starter Thread starter afsoccaplayer04
  • Start date Start date Jun 30, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
A

afsoccaplayer04

New Member
Jun 29, 2004
28
0
0
Jun 30, 2004
#1
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #1
i heard somewhere that flowmaster mufflers the way their built with baffles increase the back pressure in your system and can cause damage to your engine. is any of this accurate because so many cars out there have flowmasters.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jun 30, 2004
#2
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #2
Someone fed you a bunch of BS. If Flowmasters were hurting people's engines the lawsuits would be ENDLESS.
 

Screwed2V

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,255
1
0
Misery
Jun 30, 2004
#3
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #3
Agreed, it's BS.
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Jun 30, 2004
#4
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #4
BS, some back pressure is good for torque production.
 

Craig Mack

Busted Buffing the Bishop
Founding Member
Mar 9, 2002
801
0
0
Lake Mary, FL
Jun 30, 2004
#5
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #5
afsoccaplayer04 said:
i heard somewhere that flowmaster mufflers the way their built with baffles increase the back pressure in your system and can cause damage to your engine. is any of this accurate because so many cars out there have flowmasters.
Click to expand...

View attachment 524389 View attachment 524391 View attachment 524393
 
C

codyGT

New Member
Apr 11, 2004
365
0
0
Nebraska
Jun 30, 2004
#6
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #6
The flow about the same as the stock mufflers. They really aren't a master of any flow at all. The stock mufflers flow the same. The sound is all they really have going for them, they only use chambers with no roving material to dampen the sound.
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Jun 30, 2004
#7
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #7
They are not even close to stock mufflers that is B.S. If you like the sound of an old 60's muscle car get flowmasters original 40 series. Then get an off road mac h pipe.
 

CManT1914

New Member
Feb 5, 2004
3,172
2
0
Killeen, Texas
Jun 30, 2004
#8
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #8
I've heard too that the 40 series flowed the same as stock mufflers. But who cares? It's not like you're gonna pick up a whole lot of power from just mufflers anyway. I got 40 series for the sound. If you want power from exhaust, get some long tubes and an O/R x-pipe or something. Just my .02 cents
 

mcmmotorsports

Member
Apr 12, 2004
689
0
17
Danbury, CT
Jun 30, 2004
#9
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #9
Look, this topic has, and probably will be, beaten to death for as long as there is the automobile. Mufflers are not known to give you large HP gains. The biggest benefit is less backpressure which, when coupled with other mods, can help give you a LITTLE extra HP.
The biggest reason I am going with a Flowmaster setup is one reason and one reason only. Ever since I was 16 years old, 16 years ago for those mathamaticians out there, I have always wanted a Mustang. I wanted one for their looks, their potential to stomp on most anything out there with a little tweeking, but most importantly, the trademark sound that only a Mustang can make. Now that I finally have one ('04 GT) I can't think of any other sound I want coming from the rear of my Pony. Who cares if they are not giving me 1-2 hp more than a Magnaflow system would. I just want to have that sound to drool over each and every waking day for the rest of my pathetic anal retentive life.
 

jrc_03_gt

New Member
Jan 1, 2004
786
3
0
Jun 30, 2004
#10
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #10
H pipes sound awesome. I think you may notice a torque loss with a off road x pipe. X pipes flow better , but I think H pipes sound better.

ORIGINAL 40 SERIES FLOWMASTERS ARE AWESOME. THEY SOUND LIKE A 60'S MUSCLE CAR ESPECIALLY WITH A OFF ROAD H PIPE.
 

smokin'Red35th

Member
Jan 9, 2004
493
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Jun 30, 2004
#11
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #11
cant wait to get that H-pipe!
 

Steve777

New Member
Jun 21, 2004
208
0
0
Pittsburgh, PA
Jun 30, 2004
#12
  • Jun 30, 2004
  • #12
as far as the Flowmasters ...you're backpressure will decrease over stock, but not a whole lot ...afterall ..too much wouldnt be good either ...and the awesome sound makes it more than worth it

and by the way, get X with flows ...sounds smoother and racier than the H
 
S

stang9300

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
111
0
0
North Carolina
Jul 1, 2004
#13
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #13
If flowmasters hurt you engine then I'm screwed I have a set on every vehicle I own, except the wife's little turd civic. Both of my mustangs and trucks have them on, for the unmistakable sound.
 
R

Rio96

New Member
Sep 11, 2003
99
0
0
Jul 1, 2004
#14
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #14
This tread is
Backpressure from the muffler is never good.
People who say otherwise are either...
trying to sell you something...or
are confused, cuz a freeflowing muffler will add torque
mostly at high rpm, thus , the torqus curve will feel
less peaky, the less 'peaky' is misinterpreted as less torque at the low end.
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jul 1, 2004
#15
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #15
yeah, flowmasters also rob horsepower making your car really slow. So if you can't break 14 in the quarter, its probably the flows.. and they sound horrible with an X pipe.








(sarcasm)
 

wms004

Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,864
2
49
Los Angeles
Jul 1, 2004
#16
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #16
Steve777 said:
as far as the Flowmasters ...you're backpressure will decrease over stock, but not a whole lot ...afterall ..too much wouldnt be good either ...and the awesome sound makes it more than worth it

and by the way, get X with flows ...sounds smoother and racier than the H
Click to expand...

best combo
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 1, 2004
#17
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #17
wms004 said:
yeah, flowmasters also rob horsepower making your car really slow. So if you can't break 14 in the quarter, its probably the flows.. and they sound horrible with an X pipe.








(sarcasm)
Click to expand...
 

new22003

New Member
Jun 22, 2003
657
0
0
Missouri
Jul 1, 2004
#18
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #18
codyGT said:
The flow about the same as the stock mufflers. They really aren't a master of any flow at all. The stock mufflers flow the same. The sound is all they really have going for them, they only use chambers with no roving material to dampen the sound.
Click to expand...

You sir are a misinformed moron. But of course you drive a cavalier.
 

Ryan02Stang

Active Member
Jun 17, 2003
1,181
0
36
Arlington Heights, Illinois
Jul 1, 2004
#19
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #19
new22003 said:
You sir are a misinformed moron. But of course you drive a cavalier.
Click to expand...
OWNED!!!

 

NYStang2002

Member
Apr 10, 2003
231
0
16
Wappingers Falls, New York
Jul 1, 2004
#20
  • Jul 1, 2004
  • #20
codyGT said:
The flow about the same as the stock mufflers. They really aren't a master of any flow at all. The stock mufflers flow the same. The sound is all they really have going for them, they only use chambers with no roving material to dampen the sound.
Click to expand...

This is the kind of B.S. that you shouldn't listen to.
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
1 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
Need MIL Eliminators?
  • crazyone64
  • May 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
77
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 21, 2026
GOvert
G
P
Tailpipes for '88 GT
  • pindude80
  • Apr 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
31
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 13, 2025
pindude80
P
C
98 gt fuel pressure issues
  • chasecollier1984
  • Tuesday at 1:02 PM
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
20
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Tuesday at 1:02 PM
chasecollier1984
C
Fox Help
  • 93fox85
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
177
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 23, 2026
Noobz347
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
233
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?