• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Fly wheel Options...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Adam95GT
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2006

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 11, 2006
#1
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #1
Since i bought a new clutch i figure i might as well throw in a fly wheel as well... for mild bolt ons what balance should i get ive seen 28 ish and 50 oz... and what size is our stock clutch set up... how many tooth wheel do i wanna get... not used to having an aftermarket for my car and actually having to make decisions... lol oh and also... i dont want to go to light on the fly wheel i was thinking of alumn. but i think i might stay with a steal to keep some mass and inerta to and save some MPG's
right now im looking in to a ford racing fly wheel... any gains from stock??
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Oct 11, 2006
#2
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #2
No real gains from stock. 50oz imbalance is stock Ford and I believe it is a 157tooth. When I put the FRPP KC clutch kit in I just inspected the flywheel and deemed it good enough. Didn't see any grooves or signs of heat damage. No problems and its been 2 years since install. I figured it be fine until I rebuild the motor and need a different imbalance flywheel and harmonic balancer.

BTW, if you are anywhere near the 80k mile mark you may want to check out your harmonic balancer. They are notorious for going bad. You can see a thin piece of rubber coming out between the outer and inner balancer when the start to go bad.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 11, 2006
#3
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #3
good idea... im not sure whats been done to this car so ill check it anyway... lol but its been dealership serviced the whole time its been owned not that its a good thing... lol
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Oct 11, 2006
#4
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #4
check out fidanza. they come with a zero imbalance and come with 2 interchangeable weights in 28oz and 50 oz. also, instead of resurfacing, you replace the friction surface. basically, unless you have a disaster, you will never need to buy another flywheel.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Oct 11, 2006
#5
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #5
Green 94 5.0 said:
check out fidanza. they come with a zero imbalance and come with 2 interchangeable weights in 28oz and 50 oz. also, instead of resurfacing, you replace the friction surface. basically, unless you have a disaster, you will never need to buy another flywheel.
Click to expand...
beat me to it, was going to say the same thing.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 11, 2006
#6
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #6
fidanza is out of the question i dont have 250+ to throw down on one. And its too ;light for what i want would kill gas milage
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
Oct 11, 2006
#7
  • Oct 11, 2006
  • #7
I would stick with the stock flywheel. If the surface is good, get it on a lathe and it will suit you well. But if it's too far gone, the contact area (disc) can be removed from it and flipped around and re-pressed in place.

Autozone sells new flywheels for $50 also.
Scott
 
G

Green 94 5.0

Founding Member
Mar 25, 2002
2,601
12
79
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Oct 12, 2006
#8
  • Oct 12, 2006
  • #8
Adam95GT said:
fidanza is out of the question i dont have 250+ to throw down on one. And its too ;light for what i want would kill gas milage
Click to expand...
the fidanze does weigh considerably less, but to be quite honest, i highly doubt you would notice any difference in gas mileage. truthfully, i didnt notice any difference in anything when i put mine in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Cobra Brake Conversion - Spare Wheel/Tire Search
  • AeroCoupe
  • Aug 2, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
467
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 2, 2026
AeroCoupe
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
425
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
17
Views
994
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Aug 29, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
C
What does this connector go into?
  • charlie1775
  • Jun 22, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
169
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 22, 2025
charlie1775
C
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2026
mattcrp1
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?