• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

FMX transmission

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikec35
  • Start date Start date Sep 7, 2007

mikec35

Member
Jul 6, 2004
233
2
19
NC
Sep 7, 2007
#1
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #1
I can't seem to find much info on fmx transmissions.. I have a 67 fb with a 69 351w and a fmx transmission. How good are the fmx's? I am restoring the car and the transmission is on the garage floor, it ran ok before taking it out but I am deciding if I should rebuild while it is out of the car. How much should I expect to pay for a rebuild? Thx
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Sep 7, 2007
#2
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #2
The FMX is tougher than the C-4. Drain the oil out and it'll still pull. It's a 1950's design, the AOD was based on it. Drawback is limited shift kits and stall converters, but they are out there, you just have to look a bit harder. If it was OK before, it's OK now. Maybe just change the front and rear seals while it's out.
 
F

ForceFed70

That's why they call it "dope"
Founding Member
Dec 6, 1999
4,818
1
69
BC Canada
Sep 7, 2007
#3
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #3
THe FMX is a pretty good transmission. Only problem is that they are pretty heavy and there isn't much out there for parts.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Sep 7, 2007
#4
  • Sep 7, 2007
  • #4
they are heavy and performance parts aren't as easy to come by but they are available check out www.broaderperformance.com for some of the hard to find performance parts if you want to go that direction. back in the 70's the FMX was the trans to have for performance usage, especially in certain stock type classes, the reason is that it is much more heavy duty than a c4 but has less parasitic drag than a c6, it's actually on par with a c4 in that department. if it's a stock rebuild for the car then the FMX is more than up to the task in stock form. mine has a shift kit and stock convertor and works fine behind a mildly built 351w.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

P
2002 T5 transmission vibration issue
  • puffoo
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
142
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Feb 22, 2026
puffoo
P
Drivetrain How much resistance, if any at all, is normal on a new 1st gear and synchro on a WC T5 transmission?
  • sleep-e
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
197
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
sleep-e
Project Fox Revival (please send help)
  • sleep-e
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
226
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
KRUISR
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
607
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
5
Hello fellow Mustang fanatics.
  • 580HP*428Cj
  • Apr 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
167
The Welcome Wagon Apr 2, 2026
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?