• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Ford Racing springs

  • Thread starter Thread starter KamiKaziDK
  • Start date Start date Mar 18, 2009

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Mar 18, 2009
#1
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #1
Anyone have a pic of their car with these springs on? I want to buy springs for my car soon and dump the 4x4 gap, but I don't want to have to get caster/camber plates and was thinking of keeping for the ford racing theme going on my car.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Mar 18, 2009
#2
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #2
Which ones? I had "C" sprins and man did they look awesome but the car was too low for me. You have to cut the 2 dead coils off the back to even it out though. Man it did look nice. Sorry I dont have any pics.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Mar 18, 2009
#3
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #3
I run Ford C springs on my vert and I really like them. They dont cost much and lowered my car to what I think is the perfect amount. I do have to be careful around steep driveways and speed bumps. I don't have caster/camber plates either.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Mar 18, 2009
#4
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #4
chaos254, it sits raked right? Mine looked jacked in the back. I kinda got used to it and liked it. It may have looked better with LARGE tires in back. The rear springs are made for dragers and have 2 dead coils that make it site higher but can be cut.
 

1987Rock

Member
May 2, 2007
114
0
16
Mar 18, 2009
#5
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #5
I don't know what letter they are, but I've got the Ford Racing springs that are a 1.2" drop...here's some pics on the 2nd page
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3219967/2
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Mar 18, 2009
#6
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #6
i think it does sit a little higher in the rear but I dont mind it. Here are 2 pictures:
 

Attachments

  • stang1.webp
    58 KB · Views: 181
  • stang4.webp
    51.7 KB · Views: 157

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Mar 18, 2009
#7
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #7
Hmm.. are you absolutely sure they are "c" springs? Your car looks real good but it appears to sit like my Eibach's. My car was way lower in the front. I bought them straight from Summit.
 

chaos254

Founding Member
Jul 27, 2002
467
3
29
NJ
Mar 18, 2009
#8
  • Mar 18, 2009
  • #8
yeah they are C springs. Ordered them from gefracing, came in the ford box with part #. They were only like $120 too
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Mar 19, 2009
#9
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #9
i think i have c springs. I like them.

 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Mar 19, 2009
#10
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #10
Heres my car with C-springs. I think it sits perfect and they are very reasonably priced.

 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
Mar 19, 2009
#11
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #11
Mine were racked much more like ProKiller but my front sat lower than that , more like Black Stampede, lol. I think they sit differently on verts.
 

ProKiller

Founding Member
Apr 26, 2002
3,064
15
78
PA
Mar 19, 2009
#12
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #12
my other stang had pro-kit eibach and i think i like this look better. those pictures actually make it seem worse, the staggered look that is. i don't have any straight on side shots on my work computer.
 

KamiKaziDK

Member
May 16, 2005
555
0
17
Mesa, Az
Mar 19, 2009
#13
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #13
Yeah, looks like the verts extra weight in the rear is perfect for the rear, so if I looks too raked I can always cut away part of the dead coil. Thanks guys! Looks like C springs it is for me
 

JJ95GTID

Active Member
Sep 22, 2003
1,141
4
49
Phoenix, AZ
Mar 19, 2009
#14
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #14
http://forums.stangnet.com/504714-post-up-your-newest-stang-pics-post7561629.html#post7561629

FRPP "B" springs. Great ride! Closest to the stock spring rate I could find.
 

Black Stampede

Founding Member
Sep 3, 2002
1,811
2
39
Grand Rapids, MI
Mar 19, 2009
#15
  • Mar 19, 2009
  • #15
Pokageek said:
Mine were racked much more like ProKiller but my front sat lower than that , more like Black Stampede, lol. I think they sit differently on verts.
Click to expand...

Yeah I ended up cutting my backs twice to get them where they are. Didn't sit low enough the first time.

I don't necessarily think the vert thing has much to do with it. I cut mine a decent amount.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Strut Tower Help!
  • 93Nifty
  • Jan 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
General karthief
N
Fox Street Suspension Build Advice
  • NYFox
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
308
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
Noobz347
Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
453
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
M
How To Decode
  • Malcoll1
  • Mar 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
262
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 10, 2026
FoxChasis
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?