Breaking this out from my other thread so it gets more views...
Let's assume that a Mustang has a stock fuel rail setup. Now, let's take the tube that connects the front of the two rails, and pinch it almost or completely shut. In this case, fuel would being fed to the passenger side bank. The front tube is being restricted and does NOT adequately provide fuel to the driver's side bank. Subsequently, fuel would not get to the return tube at the rear of the rails, and therefore fuel pressure would not increase while revving since the regulator could not increase pressure by reducing the return amount and forcing more fuel to stay in the rails.
Is this line of thinking correct?
Can anyone confirm that blocking the front feed tube would cause fuel pressure to remain constant (or slightly drop) as vacuum increases (RPMs increase)?
:SNSign: has been a big help in the other thread so far, so I'm looking forward to your replies.
Thanks,
-Shawn
Let's assume that a Mustang has a stock fuel rail setup. Now, let's take the tube that connects the front of the two rails, and pinch it almost or completely shut. In this case, fuel would being fed to the passenger side bank. The front tube is being restricted and does NOT adequately provide fuel to the driver's side bank. Subsequently, fuel would not get to the return tube at the rear of the rails, and therefore fuel pressure would not increase while revving since the regulator could not increase pressure by reducing the return amount and forcing more fuel to stay in the rails.
Is this line of thinking correct?
Can anyone confirm that blocking the front feed tube would cause fuel pressure to remain constant (or slightly drop) as vacuum increases (RPMs increase)?
:SNSign: has been a big help in the other thread so far, so I'm looking forward to your replies.
Thanks,
-Shawn