• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

GAS IS UP AGAIN! RANT Thread, WHO's FAULT IS IT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pokageek
  • Start date Start date May 4, 2007
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 17, 2007
#81
  • May 17, 2007
  • #81
Earlier comment: All I'm saying is what do you expect the oil companies to do differently? Should they be charity organizations and keep prices artificially low? If they did that, then people would continue buying gas in more and more quantities, then we're all screwed even more.


I think I have the answer to that question here:

"Oil companies today are enjoying record profits, and while they could use those profits to invest in more production capacity, instead they use the money to buy back shares in the markets," complained Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., the panel's chairman."

THIS is why I think government needs to step in. Gas is not a WANT. It is a NEED..or REQUIREMENT ..much like electricity. I am not for BIG government BUT it is time the government steps in and forces oil companies to step up especially if they are making outrageous profits. Sure we live in America and it bases success on a Gross Domestic Product but that doesn't mean it is an all or nothing. It is a balance.
 

Engel

Member
Apr 2, 2005
219
0
16
Currently Fort Walton Beach
May 17, 2007
#82
  • May 17, 2007
  • #82
one word: GREED
 

parchisi

New Member
Apr 13, 2006
519
1
0
New Mexico
May 17, 2007
#83
  • May 17, 2007
  • #83
Pokageek said:
"Oil companies today are enjoying record profits, and while they could use those profits to invest in more production capacity, instead they use the money to buy back shares in the markets," complained Rep. John Conyers Jr., D-Mich., the panel's chairman."
Click to expand...

Oil companies are doing all they can to increase capacity. If they could, they would, and they'd probably be making more money because of it. As I said, before, strict environmental rules are keeping them from building new refineries, so they are doing what they can by updating current ones. Also, they'd love to drill in Alaska, and Bush has been trying to get that done, but he has been criticised for that, which would reduce foreign dependence and increase our supply (possibly even lowering prices?), and then he's attacked for not doing enough to keep gas prices low......the poor guy can't win.

Also, corporations buy back shares of their own stock all the time for many reasons, one reason having to do with trying to balance outside control of the company. There are other reasons that I learned last semester in my financial accounting class, but I forgot them already...
 

Bosko5.0

Active Member
May 18, 2006
1,067
0
37
longwood, FL
May 17, 2007
#84
  • May 17, 2007
  • #84
didnt bush just pass a bill to increase gas prices his theory is that cost more less people will use but what he doesnt relize is that it will happen and the people who can afford it are rich(millionaires) and those that cant afford it will lose jobs creating more poor and unemployed people.

HE NEEDS TO LEAVE OFFICE HE HAS'T DONE ANYTHING FOR THE PEOPLE BUT SCREW US ALL.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 17, 2007
#85
  • May 17, 2007
  • #85
I am all for drilling in Alaska. I don't understand what the big deal is if they still preserve the environment. There is really no reason they can't do both in my o. Either way, gas is too high.
 

parchisi

New Member
Apr 13, 2006
519
1
0
New Mexico
May 17, 2007
#86
  • May 17, 2007
  • #86
Bosko5.0 said:
didnt bush just pass a bill to increase gas prices his theory is that cost more less people will use but what he doesnt relize is that it will happen and the people who can afford it are rich(millionaires) and those that cant afford it will lose jobs creating more poor and unemployed people.

HE NEEDS TO LEAVE OFFICE HE HAS'T DONE ANYTHING FOR THE PEOPLE BUT SCREW US ALL.
Click to expand...

Do you think you could be a little more dramatic?
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 17, 2007
#87
  • May 17, 2007
  • #87
parchisi said:
Oil companies are doing all they can to increase capacity. If they could, they would, and they'd probably be making more money because of it. As I said, before, strict environmental rules are keeping them from building new refineries, so they are doing what they can by updating current ones. Also, they'd love to drill in Alaska, and Bush has been trying to get that done, but he has been criticised for that, which would reduce foreign dependence and increase our supply (possibly even lowering prices?), and then he's attacked for not doing enough to keep gas prices low......the poor guy can't win.

Also, corporations buy back shares of their own stock all the time for many reasons, one reason having to do with trying to balance outside control of the company. There are other reasons that I learned last semester in my financial accounting class, but I forgot them already...
Click to expand...


Did you do a term paper on oil companies? You seem to have some inside knowledge or study on them. Also, are you saying that the liberals are blocking them from making more refineries? If so, the global warming push is going to hurt the economy in the short term, especially if environmental concerns want to keep refineries out.

Still, I think some government regulation on the oil companies is in order to balance out the power, take some of those outrageous profits and put them to use for a solution CONSIDERING this is a NEED not a want for Americans...and a show stopper for our economy. I know you don't agree with me on that issue there but thats just my o.
 

parchisi

New Member
Apr 13, 2006
519
1
0
New Mexico
May 17, 2007
#88
  • May 17, 2007
  • #88
No, I didn't do a paper on oil companies. I'm just recalling information I learned from my 100 level economics class.

Its not necessarily the liberals who are blocking the building of new refineries, its environmentalists (whom, I guess, are mostly a liberal bunch).

And yes, we disagree, but that's cool. If everybody thought the same, this world would be pretty boring...and kinda scary.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 17, 2007
#89
  • May 17, 2007
  • #89
Next question this leads to..a little off topic .. but how bad are refineries in terms of poluting the environment and does the environmental offset justify such high gas prices? Anyone for that one?
 

The Green GT

No 13 year olds are safe around me.
10 Year Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,269
19
99
Louisiana
May 17, 2007
#90
  • May 17, 2007
  • #90
parchisi said:
And yes, we disagree, but that's cool. If everybody thought the same, this world would be pretty boring...and kinda scary.
Click to expand...

Yea but ricers wouldn't exist. lol
 

mo_dingo

20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 26, 2003
3,031
2
58
Tucson, AZ
May 17, 2007
#91
  • May 17, 2007
  • #91
Until we stop buying gas, the prices will never fall. They will always increase every year, not-stop. We will buy it if it costs $5 or $100/gallon. If the demand never drops, the price always increase!!!!

The only solution is hydrogen fuel cells. Once our cars can convert water to hydrogen, we will be finally free of the oil companies.
Scott
 
D

Dante30

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
34
0
0
San Diego
May 18, 2007
#92
  • May 18, 2007
  • #92
mo_dingo said:
Until we stop buying gas, the prices will never fall. They will always increase every year, not-stop. We will buy it if it costs $5 or $100/gallon. If the demand never drops, the price always increase!!!!

The only solution is hydrogen fuel cells. Once our cars can convert water to hydrogen, we will be finally free of the oil companies.
Scott
Click to expand...

GM and others have been working on this for a while now, however, nothing has been perfected. I believe that one of the issues is "hydrogen Embrittlement", which causes the metal to prematurely fatigue, drastically shortening the life span of an engine burning hydrogen.

I've only heard a little about this. Maybe someone more technically inclined than myself could shed some more light on this. Hydrogen could solve many problems, even some emissions issues.
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 18, 2007
#93
  • May 18, 2007
  • #93
I think one day we will have a drastic change in the composition of cars. Like instead of metal, all fiberglass, much lighter and such and some people could be driving 1 passenger cars like those in europe. I think the yare MB's. Wasted space will be a thing of the past like 1 person driving a car with a capacity for 4-6 that is not being used. Anyone seen those little tiny cars?
 

Therian

The Highlander
Founding Member
Apr 21, 2002
0
1
0
Waterloo, Ontario
May 18, 2007
#94
  • May 18, 2007
  • #94
Pokageek said:
I think one day we will have a drastic change in the composition of cars. Like instead of metal, all fiberglass, much lighter and such and some people could be driving 1 passenger cars like those in europe. I think the yare MB's. Wasted space will be a thing of the past like 1 person driving a car with a capacity for 4-6 that is not being used. Anyone seen those little tiny cars?
Click to expand...

If you're talking about smart cars, they're all over the place in my city. They don't bother me as long as no one is forcing me to drive one.
 

Black95GTS

Active Member
Jan 8, 2004
1,644
3
38
Marlborough, MA
May 18, 2007
#95
  • May 18, 2007
  • #95
Pokageek said:
I think one day we will have a drastic change in the composition of cars. Like instead of metal, all fiberglass, much lighter and such and some people could be driving 1 passenger cars like those in europe. I think the yare MB's. Wasted space will be a thing of the past like 1 person driving a car with a capacity for 4-6 that is not being used. Anyone seen those little tiny cars?
Click to expand...

Yes I have, and I can see your logic, but I'm also going to say that there is no way I'm letting my future wife and future two kids merge onto the highway with an 18 wheeler barreling down on them using a battery powered toy making 50 HP.

There is a company that makes a hybrid two seated roadster that I would probably rock though. My girlfriend is looking at a new Ford Escape hybrid... 4x4 and knocks down 36mpg on the high way.

Adam
 

Pokageek

Active Member
Jun 10, 2005
2,767
0
46
MA, USA
May 18, 2007
#96
  • May 18, 2007
  • #96
Black95GTS said:
Yes I have, and I can see your logic, but I'm also going to say that there is no way I'm letting my future wife and future two kids merge onto the highway with an 18 wheeler barreling down on them using a battery powered toy making 50 HP.

There is a company that makes a hybrid two seated roadster that I would probably rock though. My girlfriend is looking at a new Ford Escape hybrid... 4x4 and knocks down 36mpg on the high way.

Adam
Click to expand...


Yep. Safety would be a big concern for me too.
 
D

Dante30

New Member
Jul 16, 2005
34
0
0
San Diego
May 18, 2007
#97
  • May 18, 2007
  • #97
Black95GTS said:
Yes I have, and I can see your logic, but I'm also going to say that there is no way I'm letting my future wife and future two kids merge onto the highway with an 18 wheeler barreling down on them using a battery powered toy making 50 HP.

There is a company that makes a hybrid two seated roadster that I would probably rock though. My girlfriend is looking at a new Ford Escape hybrid... 4x4 and knocks down 36mpg on the high way.

Adam
Click to expand...

That's very impressive for a 4x4 SUV
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
First Prev 5 of 5
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

G
Help! 93 Mustang 2.3L A4LD dies at idle
  • goofyfoot53
  • Nov 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
149
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
goofyfoot53
G
D
After Market fuel rails with Stock fuel lines
  • dropteeth
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
193
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
2000xp8
Paint and Body Painting again
  • Blue85
  • Jun 28, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
190
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 29, 2025
Blue85
F
Nuther FNG
  • Flhfxd
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
62
The Welcome Wagon Mar 19, 2026
Flhfxd
F
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
280
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?