vdubsta said:I know about this issue, where if you get hit in the rear, theres a possible chance for an explosion. So where would I get a barrier. do you guys have one? What kind? how much? where did you get it?
70XR7ConvertCat said:I think there is significantly less chance of an explosion, than there is to get a lapful of 91 octane. Then the main distress is hoping someone doesn't come along and throw in a lighted match while you're trying to figure out how to get the door open to extricate yourself.
mfp4073 said:I have replied to this way too many times....basically dont believe everything you see on tv as it is presented. Spend your money on your brakes and seatbelts.
Ronstang said:Considering that there is a back seat and a seat back to the driver's seat I highly doubt this scenario also in all except the most extreme case and then I think the impact would kill the driver anyway so the gasoline would be moot anyway. To me I call BS on this one and have since the concept was originated. Like I said, I have seen tons of wrecks in salvage yard over the last 25 years and never have I seen evidence of this kind of mishap.


68stangman said:I always thought that the real problem would be that the tank could get pushed up and through the rear seat and affecting the limited comfort one enjoys riding in the rear seat. The only barrier between the seat and the trunk is a peice of cardboard. I think a steel plate to replace the cardboard would also provide a good place to mount an amp. To make a concerted effort to fire proof the interior of the car, you would have to do much more.