• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

Gears!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter latroca1
  • Start date Start date Feb 28, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
L

latroca1

New Member
Apr 30, 2003
234
0
0
martinsburg,West Virginia
Feb 28, 2004
#1
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #1
Hey all qucik question was thinking about changing my gears and was wondering what is a good set to get??
I did win a set of 4.10's but the guy said he dropped it on the ground and broke a tooth!!!
So needless to say i got to get my money back and find another set.
But is 4.10's something i want and what should i expect??
 
9

91_4ourBanger

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
255
0
0
Feb 28, 2004
#2
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #2
from what i hear its not worth putting 4.10s in the 7.5inch rear end. so im tryin to score a 8.8
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Feb 28, 2004
#3
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #3
Oh Hell!
I'm in trouble then!
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Feb 28, 2004
#4
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #4
91_4ourBanger said:
from what i hear its not worth putting 4.10s in the 7.5inch rear end. so im tryin to score a 8.8
Click to expand...
What are you talking about? the rear end is plenty strong with street tires. Why else wouldn't it be worth it?
I am sticking with the 7.5 until I break it. That won't be anytime soon either. The 7.5 is at least 60lbs lighter than the 8.8 too.
 
9

91_4ourBanger

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
255
0
0
Feb 28, 2004
#5
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #5
bhuff30 said:
What are you talking about? the rear end is plenty strong with street tires. Why else wouldn't it be worth it?
I am sticking with the 7.5 until I break it. That won't be anytime soon either. The 7.5 is at least 60lbs lighter than the 8.8 too.
Click to expand...

thats just what i heard, i didnt say it was right..
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Feb 28, 2004
#6
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #6
91_4ourBanger said:
thats just what i heard, i didnt say it was right..
Click to expand...
Why would you willingly spread bad information?
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Feb 28, 2004
#7
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #7
I laugh at all the horror stories about how hte 7.5" is just looking for an excuse to break.

I have had 3 turbo 2.3L cars and a 79 Capri with a 360 BHP 302 with a SROD and 3.45:1 7.5" rear. I have never broken one.

If your running a supercharged V8 or racing it then I can see having the extra protection but a mild hipo street car does not have a history of breaking the 7.5" rear unless you abuse it and these same guys break 8.8" rears too.

Why do you think Ford put a 7.5" rear behind the SVO when they could just as easily have put a 8.8" rear under it? Because they didnt need it and they wre worried aobut it.

The 8.8" in the T-bird was also in a significantly heavier vehicle.
 

85 Coupe 5.0

Founding Member
Dec 18, 2001
817
2
16
Kansas
Feb 28, 2004
#8
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #8
Anlushac11 said:
I laugh at all the horror stories about how hte 7.5" is just looking for an excuse to break.

I have had 3 turbo 2.3L cars and a 79 Capri with a 360 BHP 302 with a SROD and 3.45:1 7.5" rear. I have never broken one.

If your running a supercharged V8 or racing it then I can see having the extra protection but a mild hipo street car does not have a history of breaking the 7.5" rear unless you abuse it and these same guys break 8.8" rears too.

Why do you think Ford put a 7.5" rear behind the SVO when they could just as easily have put a 8.8" rear under it? Because they didnt need it and they wre worried aobut it.

The 8.8" in the T-bird was also in a significantly heavier vehicle.
Click to expand...

Why do you think they put the 8.8" under the '86 and later 5.0's?

Because the '86 Motor had 210 BHP and '87-89 had 215 compared to the wimpy 180 BHP of the '85 and lower 5.0's which had the 7.5.

I have broken a 7.5 Racing once, it wasn't even during a launch, i was under full throttle at about 40 MPH and broke 4 teeth off the pinion and 6 off the ring gear.

But, unless you plan to top 250 or so HP and it sees daily abuse, i would just stick with the lighter 7.5.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Feb 28, 2004
#9
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #9
85 Coupe 5.0 said:
Why do you think they put the 8.8" under the '86 and later 5.0's?

Because the '86 Motor had 210 BHP and '87-89 had 215 compared to the wimpy 180 BHP of the '85 and lower 5.0's which had the 7.5.

I have broken a 7.5 Racing once, it wasn't even during a launch, i was under full throttle at about 40 MPH and broke 4 teeth off the pinion and 6 off the ring gear.

But, unless you plan to top 250 or so HP and it sees daily abuse, i would just stick with the lighter 7.5.
Click to expand...
You are a rarity. When most 7.5's break, it is the spider gears. Also, I guarrenty that the damage was done earlier (on a launch with sticky tires perhaps?), which left hair line cracks in those teeth, and while "racing" at 40mph, you finished the breaks.
Again, for anyone that doesn't use sticky tires, and doesn't race it, 7.5's are great.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Feb 28, 2004
#10
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #10
I'll let you know when I break mine.
 

Anlushac11

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
2,270
0
0
Indianapolis, Indiana
Feb 28, 2004
#11
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #11
Ford switched to the 8.8" because they cant prove the rear wasnt abused when some idiot does a 6000rpm holeshot and sidesteps the clutch with aftermarket rims and tires. Ford has to cover even those breakages.

I drove my 302 Capri daily for 5 years but I didnt do hole shots, I didnt abuse the crap out of the cars. I had P265/50-15 tires rear and P215/60-15 front. I did my share of burn offs and low speed accelerations runs.

I have seen where someone on this board broke a 8.8" rear with a turbo 2.3L. Im still trying to figure out how.
 

85 Coupe 5.0

Founding Member
Dec 18, 2001
817
2
16
Kansas
Feb 29, 2004
#12
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #12
Anlushac11 said:
Ford switched to the 8.8" because they cant prove the rear wasnt abused when some idiot does a 6000rpm holeshot and sidesteps the clutch with aftermarket rims and tires. Ford has to cover even those breakages.

I drove my 302 Capri daily for 5 years but I didnt do hole shots, I didnt abuse the crap out of the cars. I had P265/50-15 tires rear and P215/60-15 front. I did my share of burn offs and low speed accelerations runs.

I have seen where someone on this board broke a 8.8" rear with a turbo 2.3L. Im still trying to figure out how.
Click to expand...

That would definately be impressive breaking the 8.8" with a 2.3L Turbo.
The 7.5" i broke never saw sticky tires, but did see regular agressive holeshots. Again, unless you plan to build some decent power, the 7.5" will usually suffice for a while.
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Feb 29, 2004
#13
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #13
As stated the spider gears usually go,........ from doing burnouts with an open differential.

8.8 has bigger clutch packs, spiders and more support, cheaper readliy available gear selections.
I have yet to find a good cheap set of 4.10 or higher in 7.5" but 8.8, right here in my local hi performance catalogue.
 
9

91_4ourBanger

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
255
0
0
Feb 29, 2004
#14
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #14
so if i do burnouts with my 7.5 im going to break my rear end??
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Feb 29, 2004
#15
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #15
91_4ourBanger said:
so if i do burnouts with my 7.5 im going to break my rear end??
Click to expand...

If you have an open diff (non trac lock) you are spinning the spider gears to beat hell.

So in short, yes you are doing damage.
 

85 Coupe 5.0

Founding Member
Dec 18, 2001
817
2
16
Kansas
Feb 29, 2004
#16
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #16
the 7.5" I broke was a posi unit from an '85 GT.
 
9

91_4ourBanger

New Member
Feb 8, 2004
255
0
0
Feb 29, 2004
#17
  • Feb 29, 2004
  • #17
G-90 said:
If you have an open diff (non trac lock) you are spinning the spider gears to beat hell.

So in short, yes you are doing damage.
Click to expand...

is that the stock one for the 91 stangs? how long would i have before i break it
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Mar 1, 2004
#18
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #18
>>is that the stock one for the 91 stangs? how long would i have before i break it <<


That's kind of a loaded question. How could anyone guess?

That's why you will get people saying leave it in there, it's good enough. It may never break on you and you will be one of the people praising the 7.5" cause it stood up to your abuse.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Mar 1, 2004
#19
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #19
spinning any open rear end like that will result on eventual spider gear failure. The 7.5 is still MORE than strong enough for a 2.3 NA though. I have done a lot of tire spinning with my car over the last 4 years, and I havn't had any rear end problems yet.
 
G

G-90

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
80
0
0
Mar 1, 2004
#20
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #20
I think we agree buff, but what I'm saying is if you break it don't rebuild it, replace it!
Or if you wanta change gears, just swap the whole thing.

The gear selection and availability of 8.8 alone is worth it to me, not to mention when you get to 4.10 or lower the 7.5 fades away.
4.10's on a little 7.5 the teeth are tiny shavings.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
4.10 gears = 200,000 miles ?
  • michaelleewebb
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
216
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 2, 2026
michaelleewebb
M
K
Drivetrain '87 5.0 Installing New Ring Gear and Pinion - Pattern Questions
  • karhoot
  • Apr 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
386
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 9, 2026
Mindseye007
C
Boosted Boss 302 HP/TQ
  • coltoncaskey12
  • May 24, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
99
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech May 24, 2026
coltoncaskey12
C
Drivetrain 5th Gear Ratio
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
B
Idler pulley as substitute for Power Steering Pump ?
  • Bhenders
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
5
Views
117
Other Auto Tech Jul 16, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?