general 2.3 mustang reliaility

snake109

New Member

Dec 2, 2004

60

1

0

Austin TX

Jan 12, 2006

#1

• Jan 12, 2006

• #1

like the topic sais. im looking at a stock 92 hatchback 5sp with 130K miles. a/c works, doesnt leak oil and looks prety clean. I dont know about the 4 banger mustangs so i figure the best place to find out is here. I would be driving this car for the next 2 years and im mechanically knolageble and can perform most automobile work. so about how much trouble can i expect from this car? Also im going to go look at it again today so what specifically should i inspect on it if anything? Thanks guys.

 

SVO1

Lord of The somethin' somethin' somethin', hell, I

Oct 25, 1999

4,592

1

0

Lord of uh, hmm what was it again?

Jan 12, 2006

#2

• Jan 12, 2006

• #2

a 2.3 With a 5 speed is as reliable as one can get.
My old 88 beater had 112k on it when I bought it, and 221k on it when I sold it.
They are cheap to maintain/drive.
Go for it, you will be happy!

 

Stinger

Founding Member

Jul 7, 2001

7,754

24

118

Basehor (Kansas City), KS

Jan 12, 2006

#3

• Jan 12, 2006

• #3

Agreed...

 

J

Jacob07

New Member

Apr 5, 2005

96

0

0

Missouri

Jan 12, 2006

#4

• Jan 12, 2006

• #4

Well mine is nearing 50k and its already caused me a lot of trouble. Mine sat for a long time though. I've heard plenty of stories about how reliable they are so I would say you should be ok.

 

TMX

New Member

May 24, 2005

0

0

0

Houston

Jan 12, 2006

#5

• Jan 12, 2006

• #5

My 93 sits alot, but still fires up when I want it to. With a 92, if the tach ever starts reading half and you have a code 223/224, check your coil packs and ICM. They seem to be going right now on 91-93s.
Other than that, it'll run and keep going. Keep it maintained and it'll keep you going.

 

snake109

New Member

Dec 2, 2004

60

1

0

Austin TX

Jan 12, 2006

#6

• Jan 12, 2006

• #6

well i picked it up, not the 92 hatchback though, they sold that one this morning. But a quick on-line check and i found a 93 2.3 sedan 5sp. This one actually looks in better shape, 140,xxx miles. new alternater and batter with other new parts in the past 6 years or so. runs great, i couldnt find any oil leaks on the engine and tranny worked great. paid $1,600 for her, was that too much? ill get it cleaned up and post some pics later. but i was suprised about that engine, 105hp doesnt sound like much but it pulls harder than any other 4-banger ive driven.

 

Red_LX

I’m not much help unless you’re looking for ****!

Founding Member

Nov 29, 1999

5,896

73

129

Morgantown, WV...where couches meet their doom

Jan 12, 2006

#7

• Jan 12, 2006

• #7

You're probably feeling the 2.3's good bottom end grunt. 2.3 n/a's are great down low (135 ft-lb of torque at 3000 rpm), but not so great up top.

 

rd

Founding Member

Jan 12, 2000

3,316

63

109

Ocean Springs MS

Jan 12, 2006

#8

• Jan 12, 2006

• #8

For whatever reason, I really like the 2.3 engines. I have two 5.0 cars and one 2.3 Notch for my daughter. That is a really nice, relaxing and comfortable car to drive. It showed 136k when we bought it, but it seems to be going on its second high school tour strong.