• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Going from 289 flat tappet to roller 302, which pushrods?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jb1dsl
  • Start date Start date Feb 3, 2007

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 3, 2007
#1
  • Feb 3, 2007
  • #1
I have a 289 with flat tappet cam, edelbrock heads and roller rockers. Will these push rods be right when I change to a roller cam 302? I bought the hardened push rods when i changed to aluminium heads, so does flat tappet and roller cams use the same push rod?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 4, 2007
#2
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #2
No, roller lifters are taller, so the pushrods will need to be shorter. Actual length will need to be determined once you've done the swap and everything's back in place. You'll need length checking pushrods, unless the supplier of the cam and lifters can recommend what length rods you need.
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Feb 4, 2007
#3
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #3
As every cam/head guru has told me, you should always check your valve geometry when new parts (non-stock) are added or old ones modified.

Buy an adjustable push rod...it will give you the answer.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 4, 2007
#4
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #4
I checked with edelbrock . It looks like they are say 6.400 length instead of the 6.805 length I have for my flat tappet cam. So it is definitely shorter.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 4, 2007
#5
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #5
What cam and lifters you using?
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 4, 2007
#6
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #6
edelbrock roller rpm cam, factory lifters.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 4, 2007
#7
  • Feb 4, 2007
  • #7
I looked at comp cams and it says 6.400 for a roller retrofit and 6.25 for a factory roller motor. I guess the 6.25 is for factory heads and 6.4 is for aluminum heads according to edelbrock website
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 5, 2007
#8
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #8
You'd have to use a reduced base circle cam to use factory style 5.0 lifters in a 289 block. Otherwise the lifters poke up too far out of their bores and uncover the oiling bands.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 5, 2007
#9
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #9
im using this in a 94 roller 302
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Feb 5, 2007
#10
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #10
jb1dsl said:
I checked with edelbrock . It looks like they are say 6.400 length instead of the 6.805 length I have for my flat tappet cam. So it is definitely shorter.
Click to expand...

Sounds like that might get you there, but has anything been decked (block or heads), rocker arms (ratio change), modifications to valve spring height, and head gasket thickness? All of these lead to changes in the pushrod length to some degree.

I'm running a 1968 302 block (zero decked), new Canfield 195, and a custom solid roller camshaft. My pushrod length went from 6.80 to 7.05". My two sets of rocker arms (1.60 and 1.72:1) required 7.10 and 7.00" so I settled on 7.05. If you want to squeeze every little bit of horsepower out of your motor, I recommend checking the pushrod length.
 

SoCalCruising

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2000
2,437
0
47
SoCal
Feb 5, 2007
#11
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #11
If you are using a standard base circle cam, a roller block, standard in-line heads, and factory lifters, your length will probably be between 6.3 - 6.4". I use 6.350" exhaust and 6.300" intake, determined by adjustable pushrod. What yours needs depends on your combination of parts and what machining has/will be done, so use the adjustable pushrod - don't guess at it.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 5, 2007
#12
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #12
Its a standard roller 302, edlbrock rpm heads (stud mount,shaved 0.020), edelbrock rpm roller cam. crane gold 1.6 roller rockers and factory lifters.
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 5, 2007
#13
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #13
i called edelbrock and they said the 6.400 is for a reduced base circle cam and their retrofit lifters. He said it would be the factory length which I believe is 6.25.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
Feb 5, 2007
#14
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #14
jb1dsl said:
i called edelbrock and they said the 6.400 is for a reduced base circle cam and their retrofit lifters. He said it would be the factory length which I believe is 6.25.
Click to expand...

That's what I would think, unless the Ed heads are taller than stock. I thought you were putting all this in a 289, that's the reason I asked. With my Canfield heads on a .010 decked roller 5.0 block and the heads milled .060, the factory 6.25 rods were perfect. (Z303 cam and Comp 1.7 roller rockers)
 

jb1dsl

Member
May 24, 2004
566
0
17
Marianna, Fl.
Feb 5, 2007
#15
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #15
5\16 or 3\8's, i can't remember?

i think these are the ones I need

http://store.summitracing.com/partdetail.asp?part=CCA-7826-16&autoview=sku
 

fasttback

New Member
Apr 16, 2005
471
0
0
Northern CA
Feb 5, 2007
#16
  • Feb 5, 2007
  • #16
If cash is a concern, here is some info to make your own pushrod checker (from another web site):

"Simply take an old push rod and cut it about 1 to 1.5 inches from the end. Use a 1/4"-20 tap to cut threads into the open ends, and then screw in a short piece of 1/4-in. threaded rod. Use some nuts to lock the rod in position. Now you've got an adjustable tool that you can use to properly calculate and order the exact length pushrod. "

note: don't try to use a harden pushrod for this.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
247
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
782
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
M
Pushrod length
  • mattcrp1
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
285
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 4, 2025
mattcrp1
M
G
Engine Pushrod Length Question
  • germain101
  • Sep 22, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
530
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 25, 2025
Noobz347
H
Brand New Built 302 overheating
  • hassler
  • Sep 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
Rcdgl
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?