• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Got Dyno'd...Not Good 2002 GT

  • Thread starter Thread starter berns82
  • Start date Start date Jul 18, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

berns82

New Member
Dec 20, 2003
43
0
0
S.Fla soon to be USF
Jul 18, 2005
#1
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #1
Mods can be found in sig. I would appreciate everyone's comments/opinions....

3 pulls, best was 242hp and 282tq. These sound like stock #'s. I know my SLP doesnt give me a ton of HP, but I would think more than I got. I do have a exhaust leak, but that is no excuse....

Make me wanna keep the stang!
 

CaliLifeStyle

New Member
Jun 9, 2004
625
0
0
Oxnard, CA
Jul 18, 2005
#2
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #2
stock is more in the 220-228rwhp range. Don't know about stock torque numbers tho. Your numbers seem right.
 

DropTopPony

Noob Slayer
Founding Member
Aug 13, 2002
2,570
3
48
south jersey
Jul 18, 2005
#3
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #3
220 ish is stock, your numbers are fine.
 

Superhereaux

chicks make me feel inadequate
Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
538
3
59
South Texas
Jul 18, 2005
#4
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #4
only real "power" mod you have is the prochamber. don't know how much the xcal will give you but you're car is putting down decent numbers for what it has




btw,
where is the exhaust leak?
 

KronicRacer

Member
Jun 23, 2004
502
1
18
puttering around Ft Lauderdale, FL
Jul 18, 2005
#5
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #5
do you have an airfilter in the mix that will free up 1-2 hp. nice torque numbers though.

hows the powerband look remember peak numbers are just part of the story.
 
B

BigNutt

New Member
Nov 29, 2002
43
0
0
Birmingham, Alabama
Jul 18, 2005
#6
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #6
Hell my auto stock was 214rwhp....now 353.
 

berns82

New Member
Dec 20, 2003
43
0
0
S.Fla soon to be USF
Jul 18, 2005
#7
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #7
Superhereaux said:
only real "power" mod you have is the prochamber. don't know how much the xcal will give you but you're car is putting down decent numbers for what it has




btw,
where is the exhaust leak?
Click to expand...

Passenger side header, its the prochamber. Will be replaced as soon as I have $ and finally decide on a LT and mid pipe setup.
 
B

big T

New Member
Feb 25, 2004
265
0
0
Hawaii, oahu
Jul 18, 2005
#8
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #8
berns82 said:
Mods can be found in sig. I would appreciate everyone's comments/opinions....

3 pulls, best was 242hp and 282tq. These sound like stock #'s. I know my SLP doesnt give me a ton of HP, but I would think more than I got. I do have a exhaust leak, but that is no excuse....

Make me wanna keep the stang!
Click to expand...
Thats pretty much what I put down, with an auto, and I also have a k&n, ported factory tbody/plenum so u are good id say. Oh, the slp catback is only good for about 5-7 rwhp from what ive heard.
 

ADRENLN

Active Member
Apr 16, 2003
2,342
3
49
NJ
Jul 18, 2005
#9
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #9
your #s seem right on to me. actually semm on the good side.
 

fudleyd

New Member
Jan 10, 2003
180
0
0
Littleton, CO
Jul 18, 2005
#10
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #10
Another vote here for "decent numbers." You don't really have too many mods yet.....right?
 

MGSTANG

Founding Member
Aug 4, 2002
383
0
0
Palm Bay Fl
Jul 18, 2005
#11
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #11
I only got 244 w/ prochamber, mac cai, udp's, 3.73's, weld in flowmasters and x-cal 2. I honestly don't think the x-cals are good for HP, but the car does feel better
 

lightblade

Member
Aug 7, 2004
366
0
17
Jul 18, 2005
#12
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #12
i dynoed at 263 rwhp 301 rwtq, long tubes, prochamber and catback, underdrive pulleys, cai, 75mm throttlebody/plenum
 

Pearl02

Member
Nov 27, 2004
496
0
16
Kansas City
Jul 18, 2005
#13
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #13
Stock I dynoed at 224rwh and 259rwt. Those numbers look right to me. Pearl02.
 

04gtdrop

New Member
Jun 10, 2005
532
0
0
Sac, CA
Jul 18, 2005
#14
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #14
yeah, stock i dyno'd 232 RWHP so your #'s dont look bad. i was told that my stock HP was a little high, but it only had like 9-10k on it when it got dyno'd.

not sure how much the cat back gives you, but not more than 10hp i would think.

i would say your good.

i cant wait to get my tune and other stuff done. then dyno her again, see how much RWHP i picked up......
 
J

Justin03GT

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
199
0
0
Mount Pleasant, SC
Jul 18, 2005
#15
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #15
what i noticed with the xcal, is that they do increase HP, but more importantly instead of the power dropping off rapidly over 5k rpms, it holds constant to redline...the whole curve is vastly improved, while only making 5-6more peak HP, it helps TREMENDOUSLY with the way the power curve acts...
 

hotmustang331

Active Member
Apr 29, 2004
2,967
3
48
Bastrop,TX
Jul 18, 2005
#16
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #16
I pulled 248.9/285.9 with dr gas O/R X, magnaflow CB, electric waterpump, P&P'd Trick Flow plenum, K&N filter, 3.73 gears, and an SCT-4 banck chip. My power may be jumping up quite a bit here in a few months.
 

berns82

New Member
Dec 20, 2003
43
0
0
S.Fla soon to be USF
Jul 18, 2005
#17
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #17
Thanks guys, your making me feel better, I guess my #'s arent bad. Next up is LT and a mid pipe. Does the Dr.GAs it Longtubes? Would I be able to fit the Dr. Gas with stock headers and SLP?
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Jul 18, 2005
#18
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #18
BigNutt said:
Hell my auto stock was 214rwhp....now 353.
Click to expand...

Gotcha beat. Mine was 205rwhp


now 341, 366 SAE
 

02LaserRed2V

New Member
Jul 30, 2004
379
1
0
Augusta, GA
Jul 18, 2005
#19
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #19
berns82 said:
Thanks guys, your making me feel better, I guess my #'s arent bad.
Click to expand...

Quit worrying, your #s are fine. Too many ppl have way high expectations whenever getting dyno'ed and often is left disappointed. Mid-pipe and longtubes will wake it up some.
 

04gtdrop

New Member
Jun 10, 2005
532
0
0
Sac, CA
Jul 18, 2005
#20
  • Jul 18, 2005
  • #20
02LaserRed2V said:
Gotcha beat. Mine was 205rwhp


now 341, 366 SAE
Click to expand...

are you for real? 205 RWHP ??? WOW.... i wonder why it was so low? i'm glad to see that you got a "little" more now
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
593
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
294
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
543
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
5
Tv kick down cable replacement 88 GT AOD
  • 5.0 HO
  • Apr 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
327
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 16, 2025
5.0 HO
5
Y
Cams in Ca?
  • yelol2v
  • May 12, 2024
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
626
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 1, 2024
2vVert
2
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?