• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

goto a 331 or a 347

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pinebluffracer
  • Start date Start date Feb 7, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
P

Pinebluffracer

New Member
Jan 25, 2006
33
0
0
Feb 7, 2006
#1
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #1
I am in the process of rebuilding my '89 302 and wondered if a 331 stroker kit or a 347 stroker kit worked best. I would imagine the 347 makes more power, but are there any other concerns, extra things I will need for the project as opposed to keeping it a 302-306? I'm sure the kit comes with crank, rods, pistons, bearings and rings but are there any things to think about? I might need pistons anyways and the 302 crank might need turned as it stands.
 

Tonys96Cobra

professional deer "mounter"
Oct 28, 2005
19
9
29
Syracuse
Feb 7, 2006
#2
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #2
You didnt say money was a problem, so go with the 347, it will make more power regardless of your other accessories, for the most part.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 7, 2006
#3
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #3
We don't need another 331 vs. 347 thread. Either one will really help. What are your current mods such as what heads, intake, and exaust? I started out and was going to build a 306, even bought one but I will never use it. Then I decided to do a 347, even bought the rotating assembly, just to decide since I was this far, to go ahead and break the bank and do even more cubes.

Cubes opens doors for larger heads, cam's and intakes, which leads to more power, which also leads to more cost. The cost of a stroker kit will be comparable to having your stock crank turned and everythign prepped, and then new pistons, a stroker will cost about the same. The only thing is that with a stroker, you'll need a 28oz inbalance balancer and flywheel/flexplate.
 
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Feb 7, 2006
#4
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #4
I did a 342 with new standard bore SVO block. That's the same as a 347 with a 30 over bore. You have to notch the bottom of the cylinders for the connecting rod clearances with the 347. That no big deal at all. Just measure and gring away with a die grinder. I also had my crankshaft balanced for a 50 oz imbalance. It runs just fine with it. They really got to remove plenty of metal from the counter balance weights to get to the 50 oz. The 11 extra cubes is good for some extra torque.
 
3

304billet

Member
Sep 16, 2005
315
0
16
Feb 7, 2006
#5
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #5
I would just rebuild the 306, add on SRP, Ross flat top 9:1 pistons, stock crank and rods, AFR 185 heads, Comp cam XE282HR w/ a 114LC and a RPM ll or Systemax ll intake port matched. Then throw on a S-trim blower and 12 lbs of boost and hit close to 500rwhp, the max of a stock 302 roller block. Way more fun and more power than either a 331/347. I have been there and done that with the 347. I wish I would have just did what I suggested to u with the 306.

There r NA 306's w/ 11:1 comp and the above hitting 385rwhp.
 
P

Pinebluffracer

New Member
Jan 25, 2006
33
0
0
Feb 7, 2006
#6
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #6
Heads: Trick Flow, roller 1.6 rockers, full kit
Exhaust: stock manifold, new H pipe, flowmaster cback
intake: GT40
 
P

Pinebluffracer

New Member
Jan 25, 2006
33
0
0
Feb 7, 2006
#7
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #7
Can the tranny handle all the added power a 347 can deliver? I have no Idea what tranny I have. It is a '89 LX.
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
Feb 7, 2006
#8
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #8
auto or manual ?
 
P

Pinebluffracer

New Member
Jan 25, 2006
33
0
0
Feb 7, 2006
#9
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #9
It is a manual 5-speed..
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
Feb 7, 2006
#10
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #10
All depends on how gentle you are with it...your combo isn't TOO radical, but be prepared that your tranny might go out.

Also, you might want to go with a not so grabby clutch. I've heard the SPEC clutches do a number on your driveline.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Feb 7, 2006
#11
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #11
i just bought my 347 stroker kit. forged "0" balanced eagle crank, forged dished probe pistons, and forged connecting rods.

go big or go home going in a dart block with a paxton novi2000 blower, custom cam, and AFR185's.

i say go for the extra cubes or u will prolly regret it down the road
 

86mustang5.oh

New Member
Apr 5, 2005
125
0
0
battle creek mi.
Feb 7, 2006
#12
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #12
not tryin to steal anything but when you do a 347 dont they eat up more oil from the rings??????? thats what i heard cuz of the wrist pin.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Feb 7, 2006
#13
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #13
internet myth. oiling problems, for the most part have been solved. if ur machine shop does a good job (or the installer) installing it, you shouldn't have a problem.
 

sunil6784

Member
Mar 31, 2005
620
0
18
Boston, MA
Feb 7, 2006
#14
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #14
I dont htink its a myth. I talked to a lot of of engine builders and they all said the same thing. More wear on the cylinder walls = oil getting burnt up. Probably won't happen right away but over time.
 
P

Pinebluffracer

New Member
Jan 25, 2006
33
0
0
Feb 7, 2006
#15
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #15
OH OK... something i didn't really ocnsider.. I did pick up a Street/strip center force clutch.
I never thought of it until earlier today, but the tranny could be a weak link here. ouch...

... What about the Puter?? and injectors?
I really want to spend conservatively.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 7, 2006
#16
  • Feb 7, 2006
  • #16
It isn't a major concern or anything but the steeper rod ratio of the 347 compared to the 331 does cause more wear. It shows up more so over several, several thousand miles though.

331 if you plan on boost later (but I would upgrade the block anyways).
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Feb 8, 2006
#17
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #17
... and a 331 probally causes more wear than a 306. I say because it's the same price, and you are basically getting 16 free cubes, why not go 347. I am sure some engine builder did a 347 and did a crappy job and the engine drank oil, when the customer asked why he probally told them about the wrist pin intersection and that is probally how the myth started. It seems that most high performance engines do consume a little oil. I don't see what the big deal is.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Feb 8, 2006
#18
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #18
The 347 burning more oil is a myth. Does the 347 wear the cylinders more? A little there is more side loading but by the time it happens you'll need a new motor anyways. You can put 100,000 miles on a stroker and not see the wear. If your worried about the pin ring intersection then use a 5.315" rod and a 1.175" piston (same as a 327/331).

THEY WILL NOT BURN OR CONSUME MORE OIL IF PROPERLY ASSEMBLED AND MACHINED.

Straight from a builder....



David your parts will be on your door step anyday....
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Feb 8, 2006
#19
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #19
Rick 91GT said:
David your parts will be on your door step anyday....
Click to expand...

Excellent
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Feb 8, 2006
#20
  • Feb 8, 2006
  • #20
You'd be surprised how many "engine builders" who have all the equipment to build a motor and machine the block, who still cant bore a straight cylinder or file a ring correctly. The myths come from guys who cant do it right. Rick put up the facts. Any motor that isnt built right will burn oil and stop running very quickly. The bigger the stroke, the less room you have to fawk it up.

And David, im dying to know....did u decide on a stroker or how u're gonna rebuild your motor?
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Weber Carburetor tuning help
  • SchwarzStock
  • Monday at 7:46 AM
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
34
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Yesterday at 2:59 AM
SchwarzStock
For Sale Ford 331 stroker engine for sale - with options!
  • TTSaleen
  • Jul 1, 2026
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
6
Views
162
Engine and Power Adder Jul 2, 2026
Noobz347
Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
611
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
800
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Motor given to me and I’d like to rebuild it what do I need to do
  • Creomod
  • Dec 14, 2024
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
358
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2024
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?