• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

GT40 intakes

  • Thread starter Thread starter TrophyHead
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2004

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Jan 2, 2004
#1
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #1
I found a GT40 upper and lower for sale. 300 bucks. Does anybody know what these intakes flow? Are they good intakes to be used with AFR 165's? Im just wondering if I should save the 300 bucks for a better intake or will this intake do? Im looking to build my car to have no promblems taking a near stock LS1.

I plan on keeping the stock cam and runnning AFR's 165. With all the other usualy boltons. Would this intake be good for the AFR's or should I just save up for a RPM2?

I dont plan on converting to mass-air untill I see just how fast I can make my speed density car run.

Might even run some nitrous but I dont think its a good idea with 4.10's.

Let me know what you think. Thanks
 

Nutty 5.o

Founding Member
Apr 17, 2000
612
185
93
SE PA
Jan 2, 2004
#2
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #2
I don't know if there are ill effects w/speed density, but I put the intake on my mild 89 LX AOD and it was a noticeable difference. I think it comes down to what you want. If you like the looks, that is half off a new one. Not bad. I paid $270 for mine used with all sensors and some silicone heater hoses and arp intake bolts. I think I got a pretty good deal as do you. You will pay $250 more for a better intake, but not enough to me to spend the difference. I think it comes down to personal preference. I would go Gt40 if I was you IMHO. If you were planning on running 12+ lbs of boost, the RPM2 would be better, but still not crazy more than the Gt40 even still.

Why not a different cam if you are doing heads? I assume you will convert to mass air with the heads? A friend ran Edel 6037 heads with speed density and it ran chitty all the time. He converted and it was wayyyyy better, fwiw.

Dave
 

5.0Droptop

...all those nights we shared, and you're a dude??
Special Agent Mukity-Muck Whats in Charge Round Here
May 15, 2002
1,785
1,130
233
Indiana
Jan 2, 2004
#3
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #3
Use any heads intakes etc on sd just watch the cam selection.
 
C

Calypso Pony

New Member
May 11, 2003
68
0
0
El Paso, TX
Jan 2, 2004
#4
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #4
GT-40 Intakes are among the top dawgs.
 

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Jan 2, 2004
#5
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #5
All right guys that's what I wanted to hear. I'll go and pick it up tomorrow. I like the look of the intake also.

Should I port and polish the lower intake or just throw on and go?

I might convert or keep the speed density. I might try and find a cam made for nitrous. Cause I heard they work well with speed density. I just dont want to dish out the 600 bucks for the conversion. But 24ibs injectors probably wouldnt be a bad idea when running nitrous.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 2, 2004
#6
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #6
If your gonna put that intake on AFR 165 heads, you better port the lower for best power. You may know I do that. $300 was a very good price for an intake in good condition.
 
C

Calypso Pony

New Member
May 11, 2003
68
0
0
El Paso, TX
Jan 2, 2004
#7
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #7
How much for porting my GT-40 lower? Hey TMOSS I have a question that might sound dumb, but I really don't know what people mean when they say "gasket matched lower". What does that mean? Thanks
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 2, 2004
#8
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #8
Gasket matching is NOT the same thing as porting. Gasket matching is opening the first 1/2" or so of the lower intake runners at the head flange to match the intake gasket. REAL porting goes well beyond that. It entails reshaping runner walls to give better flow.

I charge $100 + return shipping - paste the link in my signature for more info and e-mail me from the site.
 
C

Calypso Pony

New Member
May 11, 2003
68
0
0
El Paso, TX
Jan 2, 2004
#9
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #9
Thanks TMOSS for the info. I'll definitley keep you in mind for the intake porting. So if I can match my intake with the gasket and there is no overlapping( completly matches the runner ports) do I have a gasket matched intake? Are you supposed to be able to see some of the intake after you correctly place the gasket on the lower intake on a untouched lower?
 

TrophyHead

15 Year Member
Mar 18, 2003
1,195
11
49
PA
Jan 2, 2004
#10
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #10
tmoss- I'll PM in you in about a month.

I might convert and get a cam also.
 

saleenster

Founding Member
Aug 18, 2002
2,621
0
47
Vancouver, WA
Jan 3, 2004
#11
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #11
TrophyHead said:
tmoss- I'll PM in you in about a month.

I might convert and get a cam also.
Click to expand...


To answer your orginally question, the GT-40 flows 199 cfm "out of the box"...in comparison, the stock intake flows 137 cfm..thats 68.8% more air coming in..and for 3 bills, that's a dame good price..consider yourself lucky..
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 3, 2004
#12
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #12
Calypso Pony said:
Thanks TMOSS for the info. I'll definitley keep you in mind for the intake porting. So if I can match my intake with the gasket and there is no overlapping( completly matches the runner ports) do I have a gasket matched intake? Are you supposed to be able to see some of the intake after you correctly place the gasket on the lower intake on a untouched lower?
Click to expand...

If the intake and head runners do not match, you want the intake runners to be smaller and aimed within the head runner "window" so as not to see any "lip" of head runner opening which will increasingly disrupt the air flow path as velocity increases.
 
C

Calypso Pony

New Member
May 11, 2003
68
0
0
El Paso, TX
Jan 3, 2004
#13
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #13
So what's the turn around period for the porting? Where can I get shipping prices from El Paso ,TX to Saint Louis, MO. So when the intake is ported the gasket is covering up some of the intake runner, but not much. At this point do you trim the gasket to the right size or is it OK like that? Thanks for all the info and sorry for jacking your thread Trophy Head.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 3, 2004
#14
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #14
Calypso Pony said:
So what's the turn around period for the porting? Where can I get shipping prices from El Paso ,TX to Saint Louis, MO. So when the intake is ported the gasket is covering up some of the intake runner, but not much. At this point do you trim the gasket to the right size or is it OK like that? Thanks for all the info and sorry for jacking your thread Trophy Head.
Click to expand...

Turn around now is 2-3 days. Shipping will be $15 or less each way UPS. If the ports are matched to a gasket, none should be in the runner space, but if it is, then trim it back.
 
C

Calypso Pony

New Member
May 11, 2003
68
0
0
El Paso, TX
Jan 3, 2004
#15
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #15
Thanks TMOSS.
 

astronut1885

Founding Member
Jan 31, 2002
1,899
4
39
Assonet, MA
Jan 3, 2004
#16
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #16
I got a 97 Explorer intake for 150.00, and it is identical to the GT40 except it has EGR. I look forward to putting it on the car. For a real GT40, though, 300.00 is a deal and a half. IMO the GT40 style intake is one of the best for a non nitrous or N/A car. I am going to run mine with GT40P heads (which I got new with bigger exhaust valves for 400.00 {thanks Ebay})
 
C

Calypso Pony

New Member
May 11, 2003
68
0
0
El Paso, TX
Jan 3, 2004
#17
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #17
I need all you GT-40 intake installers in my other thread please. I would really appreciate your help. Thanks
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Jan 3, 2004
#18
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #18
astronut - I am putting the 97 Explorer intake/65mm TB and GT40P heads on my car this winter also.

Man, this new Stangnet format is REALLY different!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Engine Evap and charcoal cannister leak
  • ryan1994stang
  • Mar 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
380
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 18, 2026
Mcmahst
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
412
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 12, 2026
spencergt66
S
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
316
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
648
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
F
Electrical Foxbody wiring harness 2.3 to v8 swap
  • Foxbodyjake
  • Mar 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
601
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 13, 2026
Foxbodyjake
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?