• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

GT40 Tubular intake vehicles????

  • Thread starter Thread starter 68converted
  • Start date Start date Feb 11, 2008

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Feb 11, 2008
#1
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #1
Can anyone tell me what vehicles came with the GT40 tubular intakes? I could have sworn I saw a full sized 150 van at the pick and pull that had one, and I just did not even think it would be the same one. Anyone?
 

NKau

Founding Member
Dec 15, 2001
1,346
0
37
Jefferson, WI
Feb 11, 2008
#2
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #2
I don't believe any did?
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Feb 11, 2008
#3
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #3
NKau said:
I don't believe any did?
Click to expand...

at least one:
1994 Ford Lightning
Conceptualized and developed by Ford truck engineers as the ultimate sport truck, the earliest versions of Lightning were designed to compete against the Chevy 454SS and most sports cars of its day. The driving enjoyment offered is comparable to the performance of the Mustang or Camaro with all the utility of an F150. In its attempt to provide a much more high energy setup than there is in a truck, the engine includes a GT40 tubular intake system and iron GT40 heads, as well as a custom grind on the camshaft, hypereutectic pistons, 65mm throttle body and more.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,026
1,617
194
NJ
Feb 11, 2008
#4
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #4
The lightning did come with one, but keep in mind it's for a 351 not a 302, you can use the upper, but you still need the lower.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Feb 11, 2008
#5
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #5
2000xp8 said:
The lightning did come with one, but keep in mind it's for a 351 not a 302, you can use the upper, but you still need the lower.
Click to expand...

Well that's not cool I think I will just wait and see if anyone buys the RPM2 then make a decision.
 

RYC CUKR

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
1,437
1
38
Orlando
Feb 11, 2008
#6
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #6
The explorer lower is the same as the GT40 lower except that the port for the ACT isn't driller and tapped and the port for the EGR coolant return hose isn't drilled and tapped. So performance wise if you had a tubular upper and an explorer lower it would be the same. I ran that set up on my 93 for quite a while.
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Feb 11, 2008
#7
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #7
I just read this thread: http://www.badassmustangs.com/forums/index.php/topic,6876.0.html

Now that I think about it, I think it was a '94 truck I saw that upper on. I know there about 5 '96-'97 exploders out there... So I could grab the upper and the explorer lower and that would work?
 

Roland69

Sergeant Tangnet
Sep 17, 2005
2,867
3
58
Port Elgin, Ontario
Feb 11, 2008
#8
  • Feb 11, 2008
  • #8
sound like a plan to me...maby you seen a lightning at the scrap yard and didn't even realize it
 

68converted

Member
Nov 19, 2003
772
0
16
Colorado
Feb 12, 2008
#9
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #9
Well the truck was there... but someone already grabbed the intake. The explorers were all picked over too. What gives?

I guess it will be the Cobra intake after all. I may have someone from the Corral interested in the RPM2. So I may have a resolution soon.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,026
1,617
194
NJ
Feb 12, 2008
#10
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #10
The rpm II has a much greater dollar value than a cobra.
Just put yours on ebay, and buy whatever you want with the money.

People pick over the explorers and lightnings because they have alot of good budget performance parts on them.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,252
17,937
224
Massachusetts
Feb 12, 2008
#11
  • Feb 12, 2008
  • #11
The 351 GT-40 goes for more money than the 302 version. If you ever come across a lightning in a yard (doubt it though) take the upper and lower. Together then go for $600-800 on ebay.

At least you could sell the lower off and use an exploder lower
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

identifying smog/fuel part on 1998 GT
  • dochawk
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
151
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 30, 2026
Noobz347
I
I'm gonna have so many questions (but I know how to search)
  • ironhorsewayne
  • Jun 7, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
195
The Welcome Wagon Jun 8, 2026
Noobz347
Electrical 91 hatch wiring help needed
  • FastDriver
  • Apr 7, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
161
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 8, 2026
FastDriver
E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
155
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
256
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?