• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Guys Looking For wheels>>>

  • Thread starter Thread starter 347Fastback
  • Start date Start date Apr 11, 2005

347Fastback

Member
Nov 30, 2003
340
0
17
Central Coast
Apr 11, 2005
#1
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #1
Hey everybody who is looking for good prices on 17s, I found these on ebay...
Auction # 7967629885 . Guy has several sets... They are the right offset for classic mustangs... .... Good deal for people on budgets...
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Apr 11, 2005
#2
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #2
and....to all those reading this thread....

They are 17" black bullit wheels. In case you dont want to go to ebay and type in the number and all that jazz. They are $469 starting bid and $90 shipping from California anywhere in the US.

Next time, if you post something like this, please add some detail....rather than...

GO here for wheels 59687394. Good deal.

Thats not that great of a deal either. Its not bad though. There are companies out there that sell them for $140-$145 each with free shipping, and gorilla locking lug nuts.
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Apr 11, 2005
#3
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #3
from the auction: Size: 17x9" , +24 mm offset (5.95" backspacing)

Is 5.95" backspacing actually the right backspacing for a 17x9 on a vintage Mustang? I don't think they'll fit '65-'66 cars, but will a 17x9 with 5.95" backspacing fit the front of '67-'68 or '69-'73 cars? The chart I have says no... Anyone know for sure?
 
S

slackr

New Member
Feb 10, 2004
110
0
0
Denver
Apr 11, 2005
#4
  • Apr 11, 2005
  • #4
70_Nitrous_Eater has 18's but the numbers other than that are similar to what you are asking...
70_Nitrous_Eater said:
OK, here's a pic of the 70 with 18" chrome bullit's.

rims are 18"x9", tires are 245/40/18's

Picture was taken of the car at factory ride height. I'm in the process of lowering her about 1.5"


Yes, there is 5" of backspacing (5.95b/s with 1" spacer).

However, I think a little more backspacing would be better. 5.5" would be best IMHO. I had a hard time finding spacers less than 1" and when I did find them everyone wanted a premium. So eventually I just bought some cheap 1" spacers locally...

Rears would have worked fine with the 6" of backspacing. It's only the fronts that needed spacers, and you could probably get by with only a .25" spacer on the fronts.
Click to expand...
Seems I've been pluggin his car a bit lately.... ahh well, I'm sure he does not mind...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
New to Mustangs/Fords
  • Joradan93Foxbody
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
0
Views
118
The Welcome Wagon Mar 2, 2026
Joradan93Foxbody
J
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
130
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
J
Wheels-Tires Need Some Help - Brakes Upgrade/Wheel fitment
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 6, 2026
AeroCoupe
O
Powdercoating aluminum wheels?
  • optionizerSS
  • Feb 6, 2026
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
2
Views
363
Mustang Sound & Shine All Feb 15, 2026
optionizerSS
O
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?