H-Pipes Mac or BBK

S

Synned

took tubgirl on a date and got banned

Mar 31, 2005

991

1

0

Philly

Sep 3, 2008

#1

• Sep 3, 2008

• #1

Whats up guys

I'm just about to order a new midpipe for the stang, going catless.
I'm looking to spend not more than $170

Of these two, which do you guys think would sound better? I have an american thunder catback (flowmasters)

94-95 H-PIPE, OFF ROAD, 2.5, FOR SHORTY HEADERS MUSTANG

94-95 H-PIPE, OFF ROAD, FOR SHORTY HEADERS MUSTANG

 

T

turbogt

Member

May 1, 2003

723

16

19

Montana

Sep 3, 2008

#2

• Sep 3, 2008

• #2

I have an extra bbk... They will both sound and pretty much fit the same.. I also have the same catback, so watch the vid.. especially the end, and thats what you will sound like.. My bbk is pretty scraped up because it has been drug across most of montana, but it's still good..

YouTube - Burnout

 

B

BREWTUS428CJ

New Member

May 19, 2008

66

0

0

Lake Elsinore, CA

Sep 3, 2008

#3

• Sep 3, 2008

• #3

Those items are both the same. Standard H pipe design and there are only so many ways you can bend pipe. If you want something that will produce a unique sound save some cash and get this Mac Pro Chamber:
http://www.latemodelrestoration.com/iwwida.pvx?;item?item_no=MAC-PC9400 1&comp=LRS

 

T

tstang21

Member

Apr 14, 2008

219

0

16

Sep 6, 2008

#4

• Sep 6, 2008

• #4

i have a bbk o/r h-pipe with flowmaster 40 delta series. i love it. the sound is amazing and you can feel a slight pick up. i have guys with vipers saying good comments about my exhaust with the american thunders it would sound nice also. fitment was no problem. so as we stand, bbk gets this from me

 

T

turbogt

Member

May 1, 2003

723

16

19

Montana

Sep 6, 2008

#5

• Sep 6, 2008

• #5

never thought I'd say this, but my flowmaster force II catback sounds waaaaaaay better with my new x pipe.. the power I picked up from it and the longtubes is ridiculous