• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Headers

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1968fordmustang
  • Start date Start date Jan 20, 2009
1

1968fordmustang

New Member
Jan 20, 2009
1
0
0
Jan 20, 2009
#1
  • Jan 20, 2009
  • #1
I have a 68 stock 289 coupe and i would like to put on a set of headers without pulling the engine? I'm lookin at Hooker or any other brand. I've replaced the whole front end. I want shortys. Any recomenddations?
 

woodsnake

15 Year Member
Jan 16, 2007
1,352
15
69
Hicksville, NY
Jan 20, 2009
#2
  • Jan 20, 2009
  • #2
The typical shorty header won't work in a 'classic'.
Other than a "351 W" exhaust manifold, (Which is a decent upgrade for a stock 289),
I think you are stuck with a long tube, and the new dual exhaust to go with...
 
G

gurney7040

New Member
Jan 19, 2009
3
0
0
Jan 20, 2009
#3
  • Jan 20, 2009
  • #3
I had a 67 Coupe, 289 and had Thorley Tri-y's that went in easily with the engine in. Also they hugged the engine/chassis enough I didn't have to drop the steering ram with the extension. I have heard that the JBA shorty's fit well, but no experience.
 

rhyno9

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2002
209
0
0
Oswego Illinnoying
Jan 21, 2009
#4
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #4
1968fordmustang said:
I have a 68 stock 289 coupe and i would like to put on a set of headers without pulling the engine? I'm lookin at Hooker or any other brand. I've replaced the whole front end. I want shortys. Any recomenddations?
Click to expand...

headman 88400 will fit 289-302 in a 68 if you have an auto or a manual that doesn't use the z-bar.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Jan 21, 2009
#5
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #5
i have put long tube headers in my 66 coupe without removing ANY parts. mine might be a bit of an unusual case though, but the engine stated firmly in place. by the way my mustang has the 3spd manual trans and the Z bar.
 

HookandLadder

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
261
0
17
St Louis
Jan 21, 2009
#6
  • Jan 21, 2009
  • #6
My Headman shorties fit without moving a thing. The driver's side is like a rubics cube though. All of a sudden it drops in. Takes 15 min to do whether its been a month or five minutes since you took it out. It does go in though.
 
S

SportStang

New Member
Apr 8, 2008
8
0
0
Jan 22, 2009
#7
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #7
I also have the headmans for a 302 5.0 roller carbed and t5. Can I ask what exhaust system you hooked up or is it custom. Thinking of the RMP Cable kit? How hard is it to make your own?

Thanks
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Jan 22, 2009
#8
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #8
I love my Patriot tri-y's. They go in from the top without nicking the paint and after switching to solid aluminum collector gaskets, they don't leak. They also have great ground clearance, which is kinda important since my car's pretty low.
 

thexrcist68

New Member
Apr 22, 2006
63
0
0
Spotsy County, VA
Jan 22, 2009
#9
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #9
i have a set of flowtech long tubes, they fit well but for them you will need the drop bracket if you have power steering
as far as exhaust goes i just used the 3 to 2.5 collectors and built it with 2.5 pipe and mufflers and made some turndowns, fits good sounds great
 

HookandLadder

Founding Member
Feb 17, 2001
261
0
17
St Louis
Jan 22, 2009
#10
  • Jan 22, 2009
  • #10
Custom exhaust.......needed some big pipe. 333 and built C-4. No kickdown linkage either. It's tight, but doable.
 
C

Calponycarsmike

New Member
Jan 22, 2009
71
0
0
Southern California
Jan 23, 2009
#11
  • Jan 23, 2009
  • #11
You can always go with K-Code manifolds the really well and keep a nice classic stock look.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 23, 2009
#12
  • Jan 23, 2009
  • #12
I have Hooker Comps and all I had to do was take out the z-bar in order to install them. (the z-bar goes between the primaries) They do require a power steering drop bracket, but I put a PS delete on my car instead.

5.0 and Toploader with a McCleod scattershield, BTW. It's been a few years, but I think I had to slightly clearance either the scattershield flange or a few primary tubes.
 
S

shelby69

New Member
Mar 19, 2002
100
0
0
allentown
Jan 23, 2009
#13
  • Jan 23, 2009
  • #13
I have Heddman headers on mine for the last 20 yrs. Never a problem, except lowering the slave cylinder bracket. Had to do some frame repair when the nuts broke loose inside the rail.
 

jspagna1

Member
Jan 23, 2007
53
0
6
Connecticut
Jan 24, 2009
#14
  • Jan 24, 2009
  • #14
You definitely want to go with long tube headers. A nice set of ceramic coated Hookers $$$$ or Heddman headers would be the ticket. With your car being a 68, you have plenty of room. The quote below is from an article I read not long ago that says it all.

"Shorty headers have to worth some horsepower but the gain is minimal, I have never actually seen a direct dyno comparison of shorty headers vs. stock manifolds. Long tube headers are where the real power is made."
 
M

mushaus

New Member
Aug 27, 2004
3
0
0
Jan 29, 2009
#15
  • Jan 29, 2009
  • #15
The JBA shorties install easily. They are a little expensive but very high quality.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
First post 289 rebuild question!
  • Ddyer2868
  • Nov 24, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
227
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Dec 5, 2025
rednotch
C
WTB Inline 6 wanted 200 ci
  • Capnkev
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Want to Buy
Replies
1
Views
161
Want to Buy Mar 2, 2026
General karthief
R
bbk shorty header to mid pipe gasket
  • randyyy
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
294
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 29, 2025
randyyy
R
L
New here from Maine
  • lobster
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
438
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Mar 5, 2026
lobster
L
J
Lost low end torque
  • JJ's90fox
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
706
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 5, 2025
Methodical
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?