• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Help 363 or 427 Cant make up my mind

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93notchback347!
  • Start date Start date Apr 24, 2020
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

93notchback347!

New Member
Apr 22, 2020
6
0
1
New York
Apr 24, 2020
#1
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #1
I have a 1993 Ford Mustang notchback with a 347 and a V1 supercharger... 5spd Tremec TKO 600, complete suspension rear end etc. Ready for new engine, should i go dart 363 with a procharger or dart 427 with a supercharger.. Keeping it EFI. Money isnt an issue. I was just like some stangnet help between the two engines. Thank you. Hope everybody is healthy and safe during this pandemic.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Apr 24, 2020
#2
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #2
Well if you’ve got a whole bunch of money sitting around I’d say go with the 427. The 363 will be easier to fit, but more cubes will get you more power.

You can make 800whp without a whole lot of effort on a 363 and a f1 though.
 

93notchback347!

New Member
Apr 22, 2020
6
0
1
New York
Apr 24, 2020
#3
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #3
96pushrod thank you for popping my stangnet cherry your my first reply. Just joined.. Thanks for the input. I got a cowl hood so 351 based 427 will fit fine.. Im tilting toward the more cubes also. Only other issue is im Pretty sure I'm going to need a vacuum pump (so i was told) to get oil to those rings and for the brakes unless I go hydroboost. I already am cramped in my engine compartment now with a 302 based 347 Vortech V1 charger 4 core radiator dual electric fans etc. Vacuum pump is just one more thing to take room under the hood. Not a deal breaker just something to take in consideration. Thanks again buddy hope you and your family are staying safe and healthy throwing this pandemic.
 

CarMichael Angelo

my rearend will smell so minty fresh,
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
10,641
8,909
234
Birmingham, al
Apr 24, 2020
#4
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #4
I’d imagine that a vacuum pump won’t discriminate between the two engines. What’s good for the big engine, is equally good for the smaller one. A vacuum pump usually goes hand in hand with any race engine built with low tension rings, regardless of the power adder. A vacuum pumps’ primary purpose is for crankcase ventilation, NOT to suck oil to the rings Nor to provide vacuum for you PBB.

And as to your question about which is a better engine, Hands down the 427 is. Better Rod ratio, not a maximum over bore, better piston ring land design, buttloads more power with less effort.......No contest.
 
Last edited: Apr 24, 2020

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,054
1,639
194
NJ
Apr 24, 2020
#5
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #5
Feels like just yesterday we had this same debate.
If you are going to stuff it full of boost, I still see no need for added complexity of a 351 based engine.
If it was an all motor build, I think the extra cubic inches could be useful, but if not...

How is your 347 built?
If it has high end internals, why not just do a dart 347 using your existing parts?

The reality is that you could make 1500hp with either one.
 

93notchback347!

New Member
Apr 22, 2020
6
0
1
New York
Apr 24, 2020
#6
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #6
CarMichael angelo thank you for the reply and giving me the right information about the vacuum pump. And good point about 363 being close to Max bore. Again thank you for taking the time out and helping me out.
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Apr 24, 2020
#7
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #7
CarMichael Angelo said:
I’d imagine that a vacuum pump won’t discriminate between the two engines. What’s good for the big engine, is equally good for the smaller one. A vacuum pump usually goes hand in hand with any race engine built with low tension rings, regardless of the power adder. A vacuum pumps’ primary purpose is for crankcase ventilation, NOT to suck oil to the rings Nor to provide vacuum for you PBB.

And as to your question about which is a better engine, Hands down the 427 is. Better Rod ratio, not a maximum over bore, better piston ring land design, buttloads more power with less effort.......No contest.
Click to expand...
To be fair, the 427 and 363 have the same bore - at least the most common variants do at 4.125. A dart block will take a helluva lot more than that.

The 351w based setup will make more power with less boost. Money isn’t an object, might as well take the 64 extra cubes.
 
Reactions: a91what and TOOLOW91

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,499
8,752
234
S.I.NY
Apr 24, 2020
#8
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #8
363 is not close to max bore . Nor is a Vac pump needed to do what you want to do . A 363 is a 4.125 bore block . Darts will go 4.185 before they need a sleeve.

We have made mid 700s on moderate boost and pump gas / meth with a ysi on multiple cars . Through autos with HYD roller cams .

c16 and you’ll mAke 890 or better at the tire depending on what blower , how far you want to push it, your valve train , Cyl head , intake ,cam , and how high you can rev it based off that .

Bob Clayton has been 7.0s with a 363 in the 1/4 with a turbo . No where near a street car build but it’s plenty capable .

Nick @84Ttop crank driven ysi 438 car that was driven on the street had no vacuum pump either . Manual brakes on that one so it doesn’t apply .
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,946
5,818
213
Apr 24, 2020
#9
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #9
Might as well do a big bore 363 in a 8.2in deck Dart block. I think the same crank from a 347 is used with bigger bore. Not as involved as a 351 swap.

The 363 - The Hottest Ford Stroker - Hot Rod Magazine

News flash: Bigger bores mean more displacement. Enter the 363 Stroker. We call upon ARP, Dar, Edelbrock, Fel-Pro, Holley, Milodon, MSD, and Summit to help us check things out. Let's hope this leads to something astounding. - Hot Rod Magazine
www.hotrod.com
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,499
8,752
234
S.I.NY
Apr 24, 2020
#10
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #10
90sickfox said:
Might as well do a big bore 363 in a 8.2in deck Dart block. I think the same crank from a 347 is used with bigger bore. Not as involved as a 351 swap.

The 363 - The Hottest Ford Stroker - Hot Rod Magazine

News flash: Bigger bores mean more displacement. Enter the 363 Stroker. We call upon ARP, Dar, Edelbrock, Fel-Pro, Holley, Milodon, MSD, and Summit to help us check things out. Let's hope this leads to something astounding. - Hot Rod Magazine
www.hotrod.com
Click to expand...
Same bore different stroke . I’d build a 363 if it were me . I was supposed to get that but we won’t go into how that happened

I think it’s a 3.4 with a 4.125 where as the 347 is a 3.250 and a 5.400 rod . That’s what’s in mine it’s a big bore 347 .
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,946
5,818
213
Apr 24, 2020
#11
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #11
I've never built a 8.2 based 363. The 351 block has a taller deck and needs a different ratio.
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,499
8,752
234
S.I.NY
Apr 24, 2020
#12
  • Apr 24, 2020
  • #12
90sickfox said:
I've never built a 8.2 based 363. The 351 block has a taller deck and needs a different ratio.
Click to expand...
Yup . 8.2 is 4.125 , 5.400 , 3.400 . They make some power !!
 
Reactions: 90sickfox

ThinBlue502

5 Year Member
May 7, 2019
409
731
113
Ohio
Apr 25, 2020
#13
  • Apr 25, 2020
  • #13
One of the fastest cars I’ve ever ridden in was a supercharged 427 foxbody. One of the few cars where I have told the driver “ok bro, it’s fast, slow down.”

Just my $0.02...
 

Reddevil91

15 Year Member
Mar 3, 2010
1,630
773
163
Apr 25, 2020
#14
  • Apr 25, 2020
  • #14
This is interesting to read bc I’ve now been contemplating a stroker. Came across a new dart block but it’s the 8.2 4.00 bore and not the mentioned 4.125. Can one not stroke this to a 363 or would that be pushing the limits? I wanted a 347 but thought well why not 363? Go figure!! A buddy of mine is all about NA big blocks, and is always pushing me to do a 351 based 408 or 427, but then I’d have to swap all my goodies to accommodate the 351 motor which I’d rather just transfer what I can over vs having to buy new intake, headers etc. So I run TFS 11r190s and on lmrs page they have 2 363’s motor a ford boss and dart. The dart 363 specifically says that this motor will not work with TFS twisted wedge heads. Is this only bc of the pistons that this motor comes with? Back to the beginning here, on that dart shp 4.00 bore is this a good block to pick up in regards to stroking or is the 4.125 better?
 

90sickfox

Wasn't a pretty sight...and I've got big hands
SN Certified Technician
Mar 2, 2015
6,946
5,818
213
Apr 25, 2020
#15
  • Apr 25, 2020
  • #15
With the Dart block there's nothing that would keep me from doing a 363 stroker. I'm sure the problem is the pistons used in that block. I think the 8.2 deck 363 needs 4.125 cylinders. It gains the c.i. with cylinder bore size.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,054
1,639
194
NJ
Apr 26, 2020
#16
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • #16
I've still yet to see anyone come up with a good explanation of why anyone would need a 427 over a dart 363 in a street car when running an aspirated engine.
What, so you can run like 3 pounds of boost less?
At this level of build, that number is negligible. If you were talking a stock 302 bottom end, a few lbs is a lot, each one creeps you closer to some level of risk, that's a time when lower boost matters.
I still believe the 351 adds complexity and cost, without really giving anything in return.
 
Reactions: Ryuk and 90sickfox

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,499
8,752
234
S.I.NY
Apr 26, 2020
#17
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • #17
2000xp8 said:
I've still yet to see anyone come up with a good explanation of why anyone would need a 427 over a dart 363 in a street car when running an aspirated engine.
What, so you can run like 3 pounds of boost less?
At this level of build, that number is negligible. If you were talking a stock 302 bottom end, a few lbs is a lot, each one creeps you closer to some level of risk, that's a time when lower boost matters.
I still believe the 351 adds complexity and cost, without really giving anything in return.
Click to expand...
AMEN
 

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,499
8,752
234
S.I.NY
Apr 26, 2020
#18
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • #18
Reddevil91 said:
This is interesting to read bc I’ve now been contemplating a stroker. Came across a new dart block but it’s the 8.2 4.00 bore and not the mentioned 4.125. Can one not stroke this to a 363 or would that be pushing the limits? I wanted a 347 but thought well why not 363? Go figure!! A buddy of mine is all about NA big blocks, and is always pushing me to do a 351 based 408 or 427, but then I’d have to swap all my goodies to accommodate the 351 motor which I’d rather just transfer what I can over vs having to buy new intake, headers etc. So I run TFS 11r190s and on lmrs page they have 2 363’s motor a ford boss and dart. The dart 363 specifically says that this motor will not work with TFS twisted wedge heads. Is this only bc of the pistons that this motor comes with? Back to the beginning here, on that dart shp 4.00 bore is this a good block to pick up in regards to stroking or is the 4.125 better?
Click to expand...
You want the 4.125 Dart with the Siamese bores. Youre not going to get 363 inches out of a 4.000 bore dart block. If youre planning on a 363 youd want atleast the 190s but a 205 11r would fit the bill .
 

96pushrod

I think they're a little easier to get off
5 Year Member
May 15, 2018
1,530
871
133
Savannah
Apr 26, 2020
#19
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • #19
TOOLOW91 said:
You want the 4.125 Dart with the Siamese bores. Youre not going to get 363 inches out of a 4.000 bore dart block. If youre planning on a 363 youd want atleast the 190s but a 205 11r would fit the bill .
Click to expand...
They’re the exact same block. Both can be taken to near 4.200 and are Siamese bores
 
Reactions: TOOLOW91

TOOLOW91

If you're the village idiot what's that make me?
20+ Year Stangneter
Nov 29, 1999
8,499
8,752
234
S.I.NY
Apr 26, 2020
#20
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • #20
96pushrod said:
They’re the exact same block. Both can be taken to near 4.200 and are Siamese bores
Click to expand...
For some reason i was always under the assumption that they were two different castings I don’t know why , I stand corrected on that one !
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

T
Made up my mind.. Going 363 CI DART
  • turbogt
  • Jul 31, 2009
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 7, 2009
nmcgrawj
302 Stroker Information
  • 5spd GT
  • Sep 12, 2007
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
65K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 26, 2007
bullitstang1313
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?