• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-

Help Identify My Engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kale_J
  • Start date Start date Apr 10, 2015
K

Kale_J

New Member
Apr 10, 2015
3
0
1
Apr 10, 2015
#1
  • Apr 10, 2015
  • #1
Good morning everyone. I'm new to the forum world and new to Mustangs. I recently purchased a 66 coupe for my wife's 40th birthday. The car was in pretty good shape overall. I had it painted, new interior, and tuned up, etc. I've been having a few issues with it running a little rough, hard starts, etc. I have replaced the plugs, wires, coil, rebuilt carb, new points, etc. The more I've researched and messed around with the car, the more I'm finding out it may be a Frankenstein car. Here's my biggest question. The block stamping is C5DE 6015F. To me this designates a 65 Falcon motor but is it a 170 or 200? It has 3 freeze plugs but the research I've dive says that early 200's had the 3 freeze plugs. So I found a tag on the coil bracket and after rubbing the paint off, it says 170 64 4F which indicates a 1964 170 ci motor. I know people swap things around in cars, and honestly I don't care which it is, but I'd like to rebuild it and the 3spd auto tranny. Any thoughts, suggestions, help? I just want to know which motor it actually is. Also, the carb does not look like any I've seen that should be on this car. It's a 1 barrel, supposed to be an scv but it only has an accelerator pump on the drivers side. No pump or other valve on passenger side. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    66.1 KB · Views: 233

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 10, 2015
#2
  • Apr 10, 2015
  • #2
the early 200s that had 3 freeze plugs would be very early production(1963 model year) engines that had 4 main bearings. they are rare engines to begin with, thus i believe you have a much more common 170.
 
K

Kale_J

New Member
Apr 10, 2015
3
0
1
Apr 10, 2015
#3
  • Apr 10, 2015
  • #3
That's what I'm thinking also but what confused me was the casting numbers on the block and then the tag on the coil bracket. Luckily I think most of the parts I have replaced thus far are the same for the 170 and the 200. Just have to double check the distributor and points gaps. Thanks for the reply.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,879
21,058
234
Box behind Walmart
Apr 10, 2015
#4
  • Apr 10, 2015
  • #4
It's the piece that's under that big horizontal door in the front of the car.

If it's running, it will be the part that makes the most noise.

Oh wait... I should have read more than the thread title.

Never mind this post. Welcome aboard though.

 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 10, 2015
#5
  • Apr 10, 2015
  • #5
if you want a definitive answer, you could always measure the bore, 3.5" means a 144 or 170, and 3.68" means a 200. however chances are that you have the 170. in the end dont over think this, it will just give you headaches and stress. if you get to the point of rebuilding the engine, then you need to determine what displacement you have.
 
K

Kale_J

New Member
Apr 10, 2015
3
0
1
Apr 11, 2015
#6
  • Apr 11, 2015
  • #6
Thanks for the reply. You're right, it has definitely given me a headache. I'm just picky and can't seem to get it running right and want to make sure what I'm buying parts for. From what I've read so far, these little 6's are hard to keep tuned up.
 

rbohm

Founding Member
Apr 12, 2002
6,698
550
204
tucson,az
Apr 11, 2015
#7
  • Apr 11, 2015
  • #7
actually they are easy to tune. the biggest issue with them is the one barrel carb. if you have the autolite 1100 then you have a leg up. give it a good rebuild if you have the holley, find an 1100 to replace it.

another issue is the load o matic distributor. you can replace it with a later dual advance distributor, prefferably with the duraspark system. you will need to get a later carb without the spark control valve.

this would be a good time to convert to a 2bbl carb, the autolite 2100 is a good one to use.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
649
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
293
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
561
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
465
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
M
Engine Unexplainable Exhaust Pop and Gurgle
  • Mrnissen122
  • Feb 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
459
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 18, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?