• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Help me decide on what year mustang I want

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayk2k3
  • Start date Start date Mar 13, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
J

jayk2k3

New Member
Mar 13, 2010
16
0
0
Mar 13, 2010
#1
  • Mar 13, 2010
  • #1
95 mustang gt 5.0 vs. the 2000ish mustang gt body style. I like both body styles. Which year would be the best, for supercharger on a stock motor with the biggest hp gains. I just want a stock mustang with a supercharger. I want to keep it simple without adding tons of bolts ons. Which one should go with.


important features (I need)
ABS
Fuel mileage
Reliable
Need to pass emissions
Daily driven
 

ChillPhatCat

20+ Year Stangneter
Apr 22, 2002
409
65
48
Syracuse, NY
Mar 13, 2010
#2
  • Mar 13, 2010
  • #2
I don't see a reason not to get a '99-'04 with the PI motor. You can slap a KB on top and easily put down 400-450HP... wouldn't want to push it any higher than that in a stock 4.6. I don't know how much a 5.0 block can handle though... probably at least that much. Whatever it is make sure it's tuned well of course and it should be fine at sane power levels.
 

D-BOI

Member
Mar 26, 2009
596
1
17
Metro Detro
Mar 13, 2010
#3
  • Mar 13, 2010
  • #3
for sure get a 99 and up with the pi motor
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 13, 2010
#4
  • Mar 13, 2010
  • #4
If you just want to get a car and put a blower on it then I also agree 99 - 04. It already starts with more stock HP and TRQ and is way more efficient.
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Mar 14, 2010
#5
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #5
99-04 if you're getting a blower imo.
 

BlackArtemis

Dated 4 Amandas. Nothing special. Got the job done
Founding Member
Sep 23, 2002
0
3
49
West Chester, PA
Mar 14, 2010
#6
  • Mar 14, 2010
  • #6
the 5.0 is going to be so much cheaper to mod.
 
D

dsgmachone

New Member
Mar 15, 2010
1
0
0
Mar 15, 2010
#7
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #7
Check out the 03 or 04 Mach 1. They are easy to modify and start out with 305 HP 3.55gears, bigger brakes and better handling that the GT. They will cost a bit more but you start with a very good platform. Check out this site 2003-04 Mach 1 Registry Owners Club - Powered by vBulletin
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Mar 15, 2010
#8
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #8
The 03/04 Mach is the best deal going these days for sure.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 15, 2010
#9
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #9
the 5.0 block will hold about 500 rwhp before it splits in half.

the 4.6 will handles around 450 before rods/pistons start breaking

IMO the 4.6 from the 99-04 would be the best bet. you can make 400rwhp for around 4K plus the cost of the car.

the 5.0's also have cooling issues with big power.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Mar 15, 2010
#10
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #10
SaleenGT2001 said:
the 5.0 block will hold about 500 rwhp before it splits in half.

the 4.6 will handles around 450 before rods/pistons start breaking

IMO the 4.0 from the 99-04 would be the best bet. you can make 400rwhp for around 4K plus the cost of the car.
the 5.0's also have cooling issues with big power.
Click to expand...

Am i missing something here?

The 4.0 wasnt put in the mustang until 05 so??????Also, it is a crapshoot for a 5.0 or 4.6 at anything above 450hp! There are no cooling issues on 5.0s with big power than there are with 5.0s with low power!
 
R

ran260gt

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
365
0
0
Mar 15, 2010
#11
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #11
Modular2v said:
Am i missing something here?

The 4.0 wasnt put in the mustang until 05 so??????Also, it is a crapshoot for a 5.0 or 4.6 at anything above 450hp! There are no cooling issues on 5.0s with big power than there are with 5.0s with low power!
Click to expand...

He was talking about the special edition 4.0 V10 the was put in a few 2001 1/2.5 Mustangs , get with the program , and you call yourself a mustang guy !
 

WallyKilla

Member
Sep 28, 2009
154
0
16
Mar 15, 2010
#12
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #12
I have owned 5 Foxbody cars including 1 sn95. Just picked up an 03 GT about 2 months ago. As far as gas mileage, reliability, and comfort, go with the 99-04 body style! If I had to drive my 03 GT as a daily driver I would have no problems with that because, I can achieve at least 23mpg and it is pretty comfortable for a muscle car lol. I also had a vortec blower on my 1990 GT and it was putting down 330 to the wheels. I have seen many 99-04 supercharged applications putting down over 400 to the wheels easily and safely.
 

WallyKilla

Member
Sep 28, 2009
154
0
16
Mar 15, 2010
#13
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #13
Also with the supercharger I would add Subframe connectors and 3.55 or 3.73 rear gears and, a tune of course.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Mar 15, 2010
#14
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #14
Modular2v said:
Am i missing something here?

The 4.0 wasnt put in the mustang until 05 so??????Also, it is a crapshoot for a 5.0 or 4.6 at anything above 450hp! There are no cooling issues on 5.0s with big power than there are with 5.0s with low power!
Click to expand...


yea, do a 4.0 swap!! thats an original one. i'm sure a V6 guy would gladly swap you for a V8!!!
 
R

ran260gt

New Member
Sep 7, 2005
365
0
0
Mar 15, 2010
#15
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #15
WallyKilla said:
I have owned 5 Foxbody cars including 1 sn95. Just picked up an 03 GT about 2 months ago. As far as gas mileage, reliability, and comfort, go with the 99-04 body style! If I had to drive my 03 GT as a daily driver I would have no problems with that because, I can achieve at least 23mpg and it is pretty comfortable for a muscle car lol. I also had a vortec blower on my 1990 GT and it was putting down 330 to the wheels. I have seen many 99-04 supercharged applications putting down over 400 to the wheels easily and safely.
Click to expand...

4 then 6 now its 5 with the foxbody , you still cant keep track of your B **** , BTW 03 is also an SN95 !
 

WallyKilla

Member
Sep 28, 2009
154
0
16
Mar 15, 2010
#16
  • Mar 15, 2010
  • #16
hahahah yea you are right! I meant 4 fox's and 1 sn95. Yea the 99-04 are sn95s but they still feel more solid to me.
 

Tripoli

Member
Mar 30, 2005
208
0
16
Dallas, TX
Mar 16, 2010
#17
  • Mar 16, 2010
  • #17
If you get a 99-04, I'd specifically try to find a 2003-2004 model. They have deeper spark plug threads, and if you have a supercharger, you'll be glad you have those.
 
J

jayk2k3

New Member
Mar 13, 2010
16
0
0
Mar 17, 2010
#18
  • Mar 17, 2010
  • #18
are you saying the 03-04 heads are better, less likely to blow out a spark plug? I was comparing superchargers year vs. year. can someone give me a quick comparison of procharger vs. vortch? it seems like procharger is offering a max psi of 12 vs 10psig. Do they both come with a chip?
 
P

peepeeskillz

New Member
Mar 23, 2009
171
0
0
texas
Mar 17, 2010
#19
  • Mar 17, 2010
  • #19
jayk2k3 said:
are you saying the 03-04 heads are better, less likely to blow out a spark plug? I was comparing superchargers year vs. year. can someone give me a quick comparison of procharger vs. vortch? it seems like procharger is offering a max psi of 12 vs 10psig. Do they both come with a chip?
Click to expand...

i believe procharger and vortech can both get up to atleast 20psi, and it depends on which kit you buy, if you get the complete kit it comes with a chip
 

deftsound

Please ask me how much my supercharger cost
Apr 6, 2004
945
1
39
Texas City TX
Mar 18, 2010
#20
  • Mar 18, 2010
  • #20
peepeeskillz said:
i believe procharger and vortech can both get up to atleast 20psi, and it depends on which kit you buy, if you get the complete kit it comes with a chip
Click to expand...

your best bet is one of the mongoose kits from modular powerhouse. As far as which is better its a toss-up...some people prefer vortech (me) and some prefer procharger...

You can make up to 550-600ish rwhp with an sq trim and supporting mods (ported heads, blower cams and 20# psi with full bolt-ons and maybe a meth kit and or intercooler). Plus the great thing about vortech is you can send your sq trim back to vortech along with 600$ and they will upgrade it to a T trim which is capable of 8-900rwhp...
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
362
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
654
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
734
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
868
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
908
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?