• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Help me with my dream engine.

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95Vert
  • Start date Start date Aug 30, 2005

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Aug 30, 2005
#1
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #1
My future engine will be composed of a TT 347 stroker. I wanted to know what kind of hp/tq I would be able to get out of this engine? I was really looking forward to about 700 maybe even 800 . Is it possible? If it is, what combo would you all recommend? FYI, I would like to keep this car as a daily driver, which it won't be, but I want to be able to take it out for cruises without any problems.
Thanks
 

ROLLIN5.0

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
135
0
0
Tulsa, OK
Aug 30, 2005
#2
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #2
With that kind of power in mind, I think you would be better off using a 351W based stroker.
Brandon
 

OinkAodeOink

Founding Member
Jun 5, 2002
3,026
1
0
Daytona bch, Florida
Aug 30, 2005
#3
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #3
You dont need big cubes to make big power. 302/306 will be enough.
Keep in mind.. don't over do it, by going too big on parts. Unless your shooting for 1000+ horse a very simple well thought out combo will do great. Your average 300+ horse H/C/I 302 based combos will produce huge numbers with a healthy sized turbo.
Of course you will need a strong bottom end and block to handle such power.

Take it for what it's worth.. I've been through this, lol.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Aug 30, 2005
#4
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #4
I really wanted you to tune in since you're currently building this right? I'm thinking of getting the Dart block, TF TW heads, Track Heat R Intake, with forged internals and a 9.5-1 ratio and custom cam. Then of course, running the 2 turbos, which I'm not sure which ones would be good. How's your car coming along Mike?
Brandon, I'm thinking about 700-800 hp/tq.
 

ROLLIN5.0

New Member
Nov 19, 2004
135
0
0
Tulsa, OK
Aug 30, 2005
#5
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #5
Here's a question that is borderline off topic, but I think it's close enough. Why do people run low compression so that they can turn the boost up, instead of running stock compression with less boost? Will the lower compression/higher boost set-up (that equals out to the same compression ratio) make more power some how? It's definately something that you will have to look at while making your decision.
I know it CAN be done on the 302 platform, but Dart blocks don't come cheap. Wouldn't a regular 70's 351W block hold 700-800hp? I can see the reason you might want to keep it based on a 302. I have a lot of loyalty to this particular powerplant as well. It was just a suggestion.
Brandon
 

stprorolla49

Active Member
Oct 9, 2004
1,455
15
39
Fairfield, CT/North Jersey
Aug 30, 2005
#6
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #6
ROLLIN5.0 said:
Here's a question that is borderline off topic, but I think it's close enough. Why do people run low compression so that they can turn the boost up, instead of running stock compression with less boost? Will the lower compression/higher boost set-up (that equals out to the same compression ratio) make more power some how? It's definately something that you will have to look at while making your decision.
I know it CAN be done on the 302 platform, but Dart blocks don't come cheap. Wouldn't a regular 70's 351W block hold 700-800hp? I can see the reason you might want to keep it based on a 302. I have a lot of loyalty to this particular powerplant as well. It was just a suggestion.
Brandon
Click to expand...
i dont think a 351W block could hold that much power, and also parts for 351 based motors are a bit more expensive...as mike said above, its really unnessesary to have big cubes to make a buttload of power with a turbo.....a real nice combo would be a 306 in a dart block, 8 or 9:1 compression, all forged bottom end, top end of your choice, and 2 nice sized turbos......i dont know a lot about the turbos right now so i cant really make any suggestions with that respect, but im trying to learn, so if some of you turbo guys can post some more info that'd be great.....
 
F

fiveo'cobra

New Member
Oct 7, 2004
241
0
0
SC
Aug 30, 2005
#7
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #7
with a 347 stroker you'll be able to make about 400whp if you do it right. THEN add a turbo or two and 800whp is just the tip of the iceberg. You could make upwards of 1100whp with that combo. Why are you wanting all this power btw? Are you going to be running it for competition or you just want an insane daily driver? If its the second choice, i'd prolly tone it down a bit. Cars with that much power take ALOT of maintainance and tender love and care for the beasts of engines they are.
 

95WhiteVenom

Founding Member
Oct 27, 2002
624
0
16
Alabama
Aug 30, 2005
#8
  • Aug 30, 2005
  • #8
There is a 347 TT black 95 cobra with an R block that is making over 1050+ horses.
Can't remember where I saw it but I do remember seeing it.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Aug 31, 2005
#9
  • Aug 31, 2005
  • #9
1000+ hp, oh hell no. I think that really is toooo much for me. I've always liked how it sounded TT 347. I knew it made mad power but not that much. And to answer you're question fiveo'cobra, I would like to have this car just for braggin rights. It wouldn't be my daily driver or an every weekend race car. It would be a cruiser with excellent track nights whenever I take it. How does my above mentioned combo sound with a single turbo sound? I would really hate to work on this car for hours every time I got back from the track or from a fun Fri or Sat night.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Need some camshaft guru advice on power loss from supercharger to nitrous
  • TTSaleen
  • Dec 1, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
18
Views
677
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 29, 2025
revhead347
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
655
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
S
Preparation for Holley Terminator X install – Foxbody 306 (electrical fan, alternator, MSD Ignition, etc)
  • So_Flo
  • Mar 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2026
General karthief
SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
9
Milton Questions, 351 swap newedge
  • 996stang
  • Jul 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
225
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 25, 2026
Killer351w
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?