• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Here It Is: Uncamouflaged!

  • Thread starter Thread starter BamaGT
  • Start date Start date Nov 16, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last

66Satellite

Banned
Feb 6, 2003
649
0
17
Dec 6, 2003
#121
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #121
usa1 said:
I hope Ford makes the fake hood and side scoops optional. There are a lot of people, including myself, turned off by non-functional plastic scoops.
Click to expand...

Well said. I like nice wheels and tires and an aggresive stance, but I don't like fake scoops, wings or stripes. I think Ford did a great job with the Bullitt, which was so clean looking.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 6, 2003
#122
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #122
Guys, the bullitt and fox body sure didn't invent the scoop on a mustang that actually worked. The shelby's, 429's, 302's, mach1's all had funtional scoops.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 6, 2003
#123
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #123
Last one for today!

Clicky to see them all.
 

stangii

Founding Member
Aug 27, 1999
356
0
0
Houghton Lake, Michigan
Dec 6, 2003
#124
  • Dec 6, 2003
  • #124
Omegalock said:
Hmmm....reaction reserved until legitamacy of this is confirmed.
Click to expand...

Confirmed. A limited amount of "pre-release" press kits were recently handed out in Dearborn. I managed to see one of the kits which included a CD. The CD has 90 images on it of the pre-production 6-cyl and GT. The picture you see in black and white IS the pre production model, except the GT has the GT symbol on the side of the car instead of the tri-bar horse.

I understand that there is a press "embargo" on this kit and I don't want any trouble, so I can't display the pics until I do some checking on authorization to do so....sorry.
 
B

Boomer v3.8

New Member
Mar 13, 2003
127
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#125
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #125
stangii:

Explain the difference between the 6 and the GT then visually on the front, side, rear.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#126
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #126
Sounds like mostly badging differences...
 

Young_Stallion

Founding Member
May 22, 2002
513
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#127
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #127
Suprisingly those rear renderings look great. 10000x better then that crappy pic that was released. Bigger tips help too ;-)


These are making me happy I chose no 03 cobra and saving for an 06 Cobra or Higher
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#128
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #128
New pics added to my site.



Click the pic to get the link.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 7, 2003
#129
  • Dec 7, 2003
  • #129
Last new one for today, pace car from the back!

As usual, click the pic to go to the site.
 

tfritz

Founding Member
Sep 27, 2001
886
1
0
SoCal
Dec 9, 2003
#130
  • Dec 9, 2003
  • #130
That first one almost looks like a truck.
 

BO94ZA4

Member
Jul 3, 2003
364
0
17
Vance AL
Dec 17, 2003
#131
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #131
The Fireman said:



I like the red one. [/QUOTE
Hey dude, do one in Comp. Orange!!! A must see for me!
Click to expand...
 
D

DavidCroft

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2002
194
0
0
Sugar Land TX(Houston Area)
Dec 17, 2003
#132
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #132
exhaust

Are the mufflers going to be that close to the tips? What kind of effect would that have? I would think the exhaust notes wouldnt have as much time to resonate through the pipes like they do on the current model. Seems like it would sound more like a ricey V8. Don't ricers have their muffler right before the tip? Also Camaros do too. I hope they dont do this. It would be a big mistake. Camaros do it and they sound too high pitched and raspy.
 
B

Boomer v3.8

New Member
Mar 13, 2003
127
0
0
Dec 17, 2003
#133
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #133
Camaro's sound the way they do because of how the exhaust system is, not muffler placement.

One muffler 2 exits and some y pipes.
Its actually a really crappy setup.

Mustangs have a nice true dual system, and in this case, regardless of muffler placement, it'll still sound good.
 

DavidF

New Member
Nov 19, 2003
158
0
0
Ventura, Ca
Dec 18, 2003
#134
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #134
check this out
 
T

torch03gt

New Member
May 1, 2003
33
0
0
Dearborn Heights, MI
Dec 18, 2003
#135
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #135
DavidCroft said:
Are the mufflers going to be that close to the tips? What kind of effect would that have? I would think the exhaust notes wouldnt have as much time to resonate through the pipes like they do on the current model. Seems like it would sound more like a ricey V8. Don't ricers have their muffler right before the tip? Also Camaros do too. I hope they dont do this. It would be a big mistake. Camaros do it and they sound too high pitched and raspy.
Click to expand...

Like boomer said this wont have any affect on the sound...I believe the reason for the mufflers being there is that the gas tank is now in front of the rear axle because of safety issues. Tank is less likely to be damaged if you are rear ended, this was a big deal on the crown vics. That leaves no room for the mufflers in front of the axle so they have to go behind.
 

Reimann

Puss > me
Jun 16, 2003
2
3
59
Wherever I May Roam
Dec 18, 2003
#136
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #136
DavidF said:
check this out
Click to expand...

Are you wanting us to look at the car or the girl? Both look real nice!
 

nomuffler

Member
Aug 20, 2003
330
0
16
Awash in a sea of decedant luxury and meaningless
Dec 18, 2003
#137
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #137
Boomer v3.8 said:
Camaro's sound the way they do because of how the exhaust system is, not muffler placement.

One muffler 2 exits and some y pipes.
Its actually a really crappy setup.

Mustangs have a nice true dual system, and in this case, regardless of muffler placement, it'll still sound good.
Click to expand...
This is way off topic, but camaros have a very deliberate sound. I remember reading way back when they changed the headlight design of the 4th gen that the exhaust system was changed and tuned to sound like the bullit mustang of all things. I don't think they sound like that but And though it may not be "true dual exhaust" it is mechanicly sound and most certainly not crappy.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 18, 2003
#138
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #138
Orange what?
GT?


Shelby?


Mach 1?



Twister?


Boss 429's?



Boss 302's?

 

BO94ZA4

Member
Jul 3, 2003
364
0
17
Vance AL
Dec 18, 2003
#139
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #139
Thanx dude, awesome pix. I like 'em all.
 

vyto2

New Member
Oct 14, 2003
245
0
0
Dec 18, 2003
#140
  • Dec 18, 2003
  • #140
Like em' all eh? Then here's the back views.

Orange what?
GT?


Shelby?


Mach 1?



Twister?


Boss 429's?



Boss 302's?

 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Next
First Prev 7 of 8 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
First time Mustang owner. 1966 coupe 289CID
  • Kingkap5
  • Apr 28, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
6
Views
210
The Welcome Wagon Apr 30, 2025
Kingkap5
K
A
No crank no start 4.6l
  • Alfredosp
  • May 4, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
87
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
Alfredosp
A
B
New guy here!
  • Boats90GT
  • Jun 10, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
92
The Welcome Wagon Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
S
Engine I am having trouble with the engine in my 1991 Mustang.
  • sands9330014
  • Sep 28, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
47
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 12, 2025
Mindseye007
P
New here
  • PortCity
  • Jun 9, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
2
Views
97
The Welcome Wagon Jun 9, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?