• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Hey, new here. Could anyone help me out with hp/tq estimates?

  • Thread starter Thread starter superdutyt5
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#1
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #1
Hey everyone I am new to this site and wondering if anyone could help me out with what kind of horsepower my car could be making at the wheels? It has:

"Ford Racing 345 hp crate motor", 9.0:1 pistons, Gt40 X heads, B-303 Cam, Cobra 1.7 Roller Rockers, Edelbrock RPM Intake, Hooker Super competition Headers, Flo-tech exhaust, offroad H pipe, SuperDuty T5
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#2
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #2
I should have worded the threads topic differntly. You have to be carefull on how you do that on this web site LOL
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 2, 2004
#3
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #3
Assuming it is making the 345 hp ford advertises...i would say 285 or so at the rubber.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 2, 2004
#4
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #4
I would think it would be close to 325-330FWHP with that set-up...I think FORD overrates the crate motors they sell.

What does it run at the track, 60ft, 330ft, 1/8 and 1/4? This will help figure out the power it is making. I'm not a fan of the B cam as it is very old school and outdated IMO.
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#5
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #5
Hmm I see. I can see why a new cam could be in order but why not stay with the GT40s and port and polish them. They can still put out alot of horsepower I would think.
 

zenboy99

Founding Member
May 12, 2002
2,212
0
47
Madison, WI
Jan 2, 2004
#6
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #6
I agree with 285 at the wheels, that sounds about right for GT-40X heads
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 2, 2004
#7
  • Jan 2, 2004
  • #7
I would have though at least 280 for sure and hopeing for a little more do to some of the other stuff I added to the motor. What about the torque ????
 
S

Skooter

Founding Member
Jul 13, 1999
375
0
0
DFW, Texas
Jan 9, 2004
#8
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #8
I just installed this same exact motor in my '95 GT. Just had it dynoed and all they could get out of it was a crappy 233 rwhp. I was pissed. I agree with the previous posts of 270-280 rwph. Where did all of my horsies go??? I also have 24lb injectors, 73 MAF, 65 tb, Cobra upper/lower, full exhaust. So....that's all they could get out of mine.

What do you think?????
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 9, 2004
#9
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #9
I'd first do a leak down and a compression test to see what condition the rings and heads are in.

Valve adjustment is also very critical, if they are too tight or to loose a lot of power is lost.

345FWHP with a 17% driveline loss is 285HP
 

ashford

Member
Dec 19, 2003
485
0
16
fargo ND
Jan 9, 2004
#10
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #10
those engines are rated with a stock intake and somewhat calibrated electronics. my pesonal opinion of the b-cam sucks.
 
S

Skooter

Founding Member
Jul 13, 1999
375
0
0
DFW, Texas
Jan 9, 2004
#11
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #11
ashford said:
those engines are rated with a stock intake and somewhat calibrated electronics. my pesonal opinion of the b-cam sucks.
Click to expand...
All of this was done on a brand new motor, Cobra intake and the E303 cam. I'm still bummed.
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 9, 2004
#12
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #12
man could someone help me with posting a picture on this forum I dont know how. I have a dyno sheet of a gt40 crate motor makin 370 horsepower at the flywheel with a couple mods.
 

Black 93 Fox

Active Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,995
0
49
Vancouver,Washington
Jan 9, 2004
#13
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #13
280 or 290 at the wheels.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Jan 9, 2004
#14
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #14
superdutyt5 said:
man could someone help me with posting a picture on this forum I dont know how. I have a dyno sheet of a gt40 crate motor makin 370 horsepower at the flywheel with a couple mods.
Click to expand...

Send me the pic's and I'll post them, send me the list of mods also. I just don't see a FMS crate making that kind of power, I know what it takes to get that from a small cube motor....
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Jan 9, 2004
#15
  • Jan 9, 2004
  • #15
superdutyt5 said:
man could someone help me with posting a picture on this forum I dont know how. I have a dyno sheet of a gt40 crate motor makin 370 horsepower at the flywheel with a couple mods.
Click to expand...


How much Nitrous??
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 10, 2004
#16
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #16
This was on an engine dyno that Car Craft magazine did a few years back. Ford Racing also did the exact same mods on it and got almost exactly the same amount of power off it minus 2-5 horsepower in some of the combos. These were done on 2 separate dynos, It was showing how well old tech was as good and or better than new. 370 horsepower with a 15% drivtrain loss is about 315 horsepower at the wheels, which is sounding about right to me.
 

perkys stang

New Member
Jan 1, 2000
7,132
0
0
PA
Jan 10, 2004
#17
  • Jan 10, 2004
  • #17
I am just not buying it... Maybe so but I wouldn't put my money on it.
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 11, 2004
#18
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #18
Well there is a guy over here makin almost the exact same power as that article "304 rwhp" with the same motor cept he has 1.6 RRs,performer intake and an Edelbrock carb
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 11, 2004
#19
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #19
 
S

superdutyt5

New Member
Jan 2, 2004
30
0
0
Jan 11, 2004
#20
  • Jan 11, 2004
  • #20
This is the whole article. They tested it with 2 4's on it also and found it made less power than my combo. Its flywheel power not wheels or anything. I dont see how you guys think it would be so hard.


 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Guy with questions
  • Xkuzme1
  • Sep 21, 2019
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
715
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 21, 2019
Xkuzme1
S
347 Hp Estimate?
  • sixfeetunder6720
  • Mar 17, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
8K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 24, 2016
evolven
Is There An Easy Way To...........
  • horseballz
  • Sep 24, 2014
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
2K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 2, 2014
horseballz
Realistic Hp/tq Expectations...
  • CT Grim
  • Sep 18, 2013
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
51
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Sep 27, 2013
FastDriver
In Need Of Inner Tail Shaft Bearing Removal Tool
  • Nicholas_Yellow_94Gt
  • Sep 13, 2014
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 16, 2014
Gearbanger 101
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?