• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Hittin the Dyno

  • Thread starter Thread starter blown65
  • Start date Start date Mar 16, 2009
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last

Bosscat

Founding Member
Sep 30, 1999
1,265
0
0
England
Apr 18, 2009
#21
  • Apr 18, 2009
  • #21
blown65 said:
Just got back from the track. Not much traction off the line, no prep but still did pretty good. Has quite a bit left since I'm spinning pretty hard. Hopefully next outing they will have more rubber down.

10.28@130.5. First run had a 10.34@131.3 1.48 60'
Click to expand...


That Stang sounds AWESOME
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 18, 2009
#22
  • Apr 18, 2009
  • #22
Got the vid up of the last run. Gotta get my traction figured out now off the line.

Medford Drags 2009 on Vimeo
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Apr 19, 2009
#23
  • Apr 19, 2009
  • #23
Dayum. Poor chebby didn't see that coming. that things sounds great man !! Very impressed by the numbers.
 

SadbutTrue

Founding Member
May 1, 2002
2,390
4
49
Granada Hills, California
Apr 19, 2009
#24
  • Apr 19, 2009
  • #24
damn... great numbers man!
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 25, 2009
#25
  • Apr 25, 2009
  • #25
Thanks for the comments.

Few more runs with some video of them.

http://vimeo.com/4333055

Gotta work on my front suspension. Cutting the front springs was a bad idea for me, stance is better but its too slow to transfer weight. Got some springs on order and some new strutrods to help loosen the front back up. Track got pretty slick by the last runs, was going a slow 1.56 (usually 1.48-1.50's for me)
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Apr 27, 2009
#26
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #26
what front springs are you getting? i cut my springs too, and i'm sure that alot of my problems.
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Apr 27, 2009
#27
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #27
6 cyl work REALLY well for me. Have you gotten roller perches yet ? That was a big one for me.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 27, 2009
#28
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #28
I have the roller perches, Calvert 90/10s and 6 cylinder springs that are cut.

I went with some springs and strut rods that money maker racing sells. Only thing left on the front would be roller UCA to free it up, doubt it would make that much of a difference though.

It actually leaves better from an idle than off the transbrake. I might have to try the bottom hole instead of the top on the Caltracs. I did try different preloads but just could not take enough out of it off the brake to make it work.
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
Apr 27, 2009
#29
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #29
i've heard about the 6cyl springs. isn't there an a/c and non-a/c option? which one should i get?
since i have a windsor, turbo, and steel hood, i doubt i would have to cut a 6cyl spring.
thanks.

edit- yes i have the roller perches.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 27, 2009
#30
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #30
I would say non AC. I know moneymaker uses something else though, you may wanna contact them. Or you can wait till after the 8th and I will know more on how these work that I'm getting.

Here is a pic of the strut rods that are coming.

 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Apr 27, 2009
#31
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #31
blown65 said:
It actually leaves better from an idle than off the transbrake. I might have to try the bottom hole instead of the top on the Caltracs. I did try different preloads but just could not take enough out of it off the brake to make it work.
Click to expand...
In my line of thinking it was because the tires had just a split second to turn and bite before they were hit. If I used the brake up to 3k, it would flash higher and dead hook. Taking it 3400 it would spin. I think you'd do better in the upper holes either way. Probably doesn't hit the tires hard enough for the upper hole. "recommended'' is having the bar level with the ground.

Paul, mine are stocker's from '68. I'd try w/ AC and cut to make it level if you had to.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 27, 2009
#32
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #32
10secgoal said:
In my line of thinking it was because the tires had just a split second to turn and bite before they were hit. If I used the brake up to 3k, it would flash higher and dead hook. Taking it 3400 it would spin. I think you'd do better in the upper holes either way. Probably doesn't hit the tires hard enough for the upper hole. "recommended'' is having the bar level with the ground.

Paul, mine are stocker's from '68. I'd try w/ AC and cut to make it level if you had to.
Click to expand...

Mine goes 1.50 footbrake but 1.56 this weekend off the tbrake. Its hitting the tires too hard and spinning hard. That and the track going away didnt help. The nice cool night the other time out it actually hooked better. That cool night it went 1.48 but still leaving very soft from tire spin. Get to about the xmas tree and you can feel it bite. I think once its actually hooking correctly it will be low 1.40's no problem. Might just have to go to 26x10.5's
 
1

10secgoal

Active Member
Dec 1, 2003
2,801
3
49
San Diego
Apr 27, 2009
#33
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #33
Sorry, what I meant was not throwing the rear out of the car hard enough. Any better pics/vid of the launch up close? I've got ones where I could tell exactly what was going on. Found out I needed longer shocks. Nose was in the air and it would kinda bounce on the rear tires when the shocks maxed out.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
Apr 27, 2009
#34
  • Apr 27, 2009
  • #34
Just those vids on my Vimeo page is all I have. Ill know more once I go back out in two weeks.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
May 9, 2009
#35
  • May 9, 2009
  • #35
Well, no gains but got a couple cool pics from the track last night.



 

Bosscat

Founding Member
Sep 30, 1999
1,265
0
0
England
May 9, 2009
#36
  • May 9, 2009
  • #36
Nice launch!
 

LW_horse

Member
Oct 31, 2006
37
0
6
Sweden
May 13, 2009
#37
  • May 13, 2009
  • #37
Impressive.

It's inspiring to follow the progress/performance of your Stang.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
May 15, 2009
#38
  • May 15, 2009
  • #38
Decided to try my street tires. 275/40/17's Hoosier Drag Radials. Running 14psi air pressure in them.

First run left from an idle, 1.65 60' bogged on me. I needed to adjust my idle mixture for the different fuel. forgot

Second run, set the transbrake, brought rpms to about 4500 with the throttle (about 1/2 or a little less throttle) Nailed it on the last yellow and left HARD. 1.44 60' and a -.002 reaction time. LOL Just about perfect. Third run did the same 1.44 60' again.

Very impressed with these tires. Didn't expect it to hook like that, and now I cant wait to try to launch that way with my slicks. Floored on the transbrake just hits them too hard and over powers them. Best 60' on slicks was a 1.48. Go figure.

10.27@129mph with the 1.44 60'
 

classic boost

Founding Member
Feb 3, 1999
709
0
0
canton, oh
May 18, 2009
#39
  • May 18, 2009
  • #39
CONGRATS!!!!

have your tried more air pressure with the hoosier's? those generally like about 18psi.
 

blown65

Founding Member
Jul 7, 1999
1,938
4
39
Queen Creek Arizona
May 18, 2009
#40
  • May 18, 2009
  • #40
classic boost said:
CONGRATS!!!!

have your tried more air pressure with the hoosier's? those generally like about 18psi.
Click to expand...


I had used them before and ran higher air pressures and it never seemed to work well for me. I just went back to the 13-14 that I usually run in them. Of course my suspension wasn't nearly as good as it is now, but at 16 and higher they would just spin on me. Only pulling 1.7's back then with them though.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
First Prev 2 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Exhaust Headers - Myths and Secrets...
  • geoklass
  • Jun 20, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2021
WhiteCobra95
1993 Lx 427 Stroker
  • autopart101
  • Mar 5, 2017
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
14
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 5, 2018
95BlueStallion
8
  • Locked
351 lmsc circle track motor dyno only 442 hp
  • 89 347 stang
  • Oct 4, 2009
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
3K
Engine and Power Adder Oct 4, 2009
89 347 stang
8
Dyno And Track This Friday
  • ChromdOutDubs
  • May 21, 2008
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 25, 2008
25thmustang
Car Back Together and Dyno Tuned: Results
  • 92 Couper
  • May 18, 2006
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 18, 2006
myshifter
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?