• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How is the steering supposed to feel on a 5.0?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ramjetlx
  • Start date Start date Feb 14, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Feb 15, 2006
#21
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #21
Mustang5L5 said:
Few notice it, but once you do it sticks out like a sore thumb.
Click to expand...
I checked it out closer while gettin in the car today. My mind could be fooling me, but the wheel looks like it is perceptably angled toward the driver door (on the '94). I had noticed this before, but not on the 88 GT vert (the lack of structure could jade my perspective, or the fox is not angled as much).
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 15, 2006
#22
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #22
I have been thinking of dropping the PS line pressure on my 88 to heavy up the steering a bit
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
34
129
Feb 15, 2006
#23
  • Feb 15, 2006
  • #23
352Ford2 said:
I have been thinking of dropping the PS line pressure on my 88 to heavy up the steering a bit
Click to expand...
It should get quite a good bit heavier.

352, it seems to me that you are the engineer type (we know Mike is too). What do you guys think of installing some sort of restrictor in the high pressure line, rather than doing away with it altogether? Seems like it *might* provide more feedback that way, without feeling like steering a whale. It would help preserve the rack longer I would think too.
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Feb 16, 2006
#24
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #24
HISSIN50 said:
It should get quite a good bit heavier.

352, it seems to me that you are the engineer type (we know Mike is too). What do you guys think of installing some sort of restrictor in the high pressure line, rather than doing away with it altogether? Seems like it *might* provide more feedback that way, without feeling like steering a whale. It would help preserve the rack longer I would think too.
Click to expand...

i thought of this as well, but everything that i have learned has told me that this will effectively raise the pressure and possibly burn out the pump prematurely
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Feb 16, 2006
#25
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #25
i like a slightly harder steering wheel, but my fox's steering isnt too bad, i have never said "**** this steering is light" but i do like it harder to turn like in some newer cars.
 

352Ford2

New Member
Oct 12, 2005
393
0
0
Seattle,WA
Feb 16, 2006
#26
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #26
Kumm3 said:
i thought of this as well, but everything that i have learned has told me that this will effectively raise the pressure and possibly burn out the pump prematurely
Click to expand...

just run a bypass line from the high press side to the low pressure side with a adjustible reg and you should be good. the pump will actualy be working less hard
 

Zero_chance

Founding Member
May 29, 2001
1,244
7
59
Maricopa, AZ
Feb 16, 2006
#27
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #27
I never consider my 88 5.0 easy to steer though it is a lot lighter than my old 94. Anyone here drive an Aviator with the VAPS II steering system? At max assist, that is some light a$$ steering.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,264
17,950
224
Massachusetts
Feb 16, 2006
#28
  • Feb 16, 2006
  • #28
HISSIN50 said:
It should get quite a good bit heavier.

352, it seems to me that you are the engineer type (we know Mike is too). What do you guys think of installing some sort of restrictor in the high pressure line, rather than doing away with it altogether? Seems like it *might* provide more feedback that way, without feeling like steering a whale. It would help preserve the rack longer I would think too.
Click to expand...


It's a great idea but i can't in good conscience recommend someone modding a component like this. I generally try to stay away from posting suggestions about "redneck engineering" something that if it fails may get someone killed. With Brakes, suspension, steering and other vital components, i just say buy the right parts and hardware or quality aftermarket components.

Last thing i need to read about is someones steering failing and them running their car into a wall because i suggested they install a restrictor.

In theory it could work, but it could also put more strain on the steering rack and pinion itself and cause premature wear.

If you guys want SN95 feel to your steering, install an SN95 rack. I read a good write-up on it on the corral but can't seem to find it.
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#29
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #29
found a forum with a lot of great info


from just skimming through theyve got a 2000 cobra r rack thatll bolt up with a different bottom u joint on the rack or different rack altogether, and sn-95 tie rod ends.

or i guess an sn-95 rack will work with 92 taurus tie rod ends?

too tired to make sense of all this, someone sort out the info maybe? thanks
 
K

Kerpal

New Member
Aug 9, 2004
400
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#30
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #30
what's the link to that forum?
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
33
69
East Hartford, CT
Feb 17, 2006
#31
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #31
Euphoric306 said:
or i guess an sn-95 rack will work with 92 taurus tie rod ends?
Click to expand...

thats exactly what was used on the 93 Cobra R
 

stangjunkie

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
381
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#32
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #32
what if you underdrive the power steering pump?? it will build up less pressure then you could restrict the line or unerdrive may be enough on its own?? just a thought
 

rd

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2000
3,316
63
109
Ocean Springs MS
Feb 17, 2006
#33
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #33
I like the standard Mustang ps. Its light and easy to drive, and does not take any extra concentration. I wish the racks would not leak so often.

Even my manual rack 82 is relatively easy to steer.

I'm not much into steering feedback and feel. I want to drive comfortably and easily. If they track straight at 100 or so, for that last few seconds before you clear the finish line, then they steer pefectly.
 

frankienstang

Member
Feb 27, 2002
0
0
6
dayton, oh
Feb 17, 2006
#34
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #34
in my car to correct the problem was to put in a short ratio sterring rack. it is 15:1 as opposed to a 17:1 stock rack. it really tightened things up. instead of a quarter turn to change lanes, it barely have to bump the wheel. it is ideal for an autocross course also. this place in my area sells them for 65.00. we put one in my buddy's car also. it gives you the impression of driving a go cart.
 

stangjunkie

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
381
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#35
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #35
any info on that rack?? web site phone number??
 

frankienstang

Member
Feb 27, 2002
0
0
6
dayton, oh
Feb 17, 2006
#36
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #36
the name of the place is "undercar specialty warehouse" their phone number is (937) 252-8890. it is a remanufactered rack is probably why it is so cheap. i have had no problems with mine at all, it makes a world of difference in the feel of my car, one of the best upgades i have done so far.
 

stangjunkie

New Member
Nov 15, 2004
381
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#37
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #37
my spec sheet says fox'es came stock with 18:1 now to put that in perspective the new 05 have 15.7:1 so 15:1 would be good how firm is that?? too firm for an auto x car??
 

Euphoric306

New Member
Apr 5, 2004
905
0
0
Feb 17, 2006
#38
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #38
firmness has nothing to do with the ratio, the ratio just means how far you have to turn the wheel before the wheels turn a certain amount, like a truck vs a mustang, different ratio, i have to hand over hand to park in my dads ranger, but just a slight turn in my stang


im sure v8 foxes came with 15:1, v6 and 4cyls came with the 20:1


my apologies it was late and didnt realize the link didnt show here it is now

http://forums.corner-carvers.com/showthread.php?t=13876

it links to other threads that are about alternators and what not but they also have random info about the steering rack swap.
 

ramjetlx

New Member
Apr 8, 2005
212
0
0
Honolulu, Hawaii
Feb 17, 2006
#39
  • Feb 17, 2006
  • #39
stangjunkie said:
my spec sheet says fox'es came stock with 18:1 now to put that in perspective the new 05 have 15.7:1 so 15:1 would be good how firm is that?? too firm for an auto x car??
Click to expand...

The V8 foxes came with a 15:1 steering ratio. Some companies offer a manual rack with this ratio also, I believe Flaming River is one of them. The turning radius in the new mustangs are much better then the foxes despite being a much bigger car.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Steering whine
  • healy1963
  • May 9, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
78
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
gkomo
S
1965 Mustang with 80s 5.0 engine in it Power Steering hose or connection ID?
  • spearce
  • May 19, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
114
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Jun 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
G
79 steering rack problems
  • garyrc
  • Mar 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
138
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 8, 2026
AeroCoupe
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
95
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
315
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?