• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

How to: Re-wiring/providing power to ECT sensor

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaymac
  • Start date Start date Nov 11, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 11, 2005
#1
  • Nov 11, 2005
  • #1
So, I finally followed JRichker's advice and tried to test my ECT sensor for power/volts. Turns out there is not even power coming through the wires to the sensor.
So now, where do I start?
Is it possible to just jump pwer from another sensor to the ECT to power it up, or am I in for more of a PITA than that?
Any and all advice is appreciated.
Keep in mind, I am electrically retarded

Thanks,
jeremy
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 11, 2005
#2
  • Nov 11, 2005
  • #2
The ACT sensor only has 2 wires, a signal ground (black/white) and signal (dark green/lt green). There is no power wire.
Diagram courtsey of Tmoss & Stang&2birds...

 

Attachments

  • 88-91eecPinout.gif
    167.1 KB · Views: 347

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 12, 2005
#3
  • Nov 12, 2005
  • #3
It's actually the ECT sensor, but same story I guess. I'm going to probe the 10 pin today and see if it's dead there. If it's dead all the way to the computer, then what??
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 14, 2005
#4
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #4
well, upon further test-light testing, the ACT snsor has no signal either.
Then I disconnected the salt and peppers also and tried to test those leads and didn't find any signal (no light on the test light) on any prong except the EVP, which has been throwing a code since the day I got the car.
Go figure.
Then, by the computer, I found a Green/yellow wire in a connector, and it lit up the test light, Is there only 1 g/y wire, or could this be something else?
Where do I look next?
What could this be affecting, if I have no signal to my ACT/ECT, and how do I fix it!?!?!?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 14, 2005
#5
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #5
jaymac said:
well, upon further test-light testing, the ACT snsor has no signal either.
Then I disconnected the salt and peppers also and tried to test those leads and didn't find any signal (no light on the test light) on any prong except the EVP, which has been throwing a code since the day I got the car.
Go figure.
Then, by the computer, I found a Green/yellow wire in a connector, and it lit up the test light, Is there only 1 g/y wire, or could this be something else?
Where do I look next?
What could this be affecting, if I have no signal to my ACT/ECT, and how do I fix it!?!?!?
Click to expand...
There is a light green/yellow wire (ECT) and a dark green/yellow wire ( IDM)

See the following website for some help from Tmoss (diagram designer) & Stang&2Birds (website host) for help on 88-90 wiring

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/IgnitionSwitchWiring.gif

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/fuel-alt-links-ign-ac.gif

http://www.veryuseful.com/mustang/tech/engine/images/88-91eecPinout.gif

 

Attachments

  • 88-91eecPinout.gif
    167.1 KB · Views: 1,311

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 14, 2005
#6
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #6
so is there a possiblity saomehting inside the computer itself is blown/faulty, or does this sound like strictly an external wiring thing?
And lastly, what kind of symptoms/conditions could this be causing?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 14, 2005
#7
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #7
Bad ECT causes hard starting , high fuel consumption, poor performance.

I would disconnect the computer wiring plug at the computer and measure the resistance from the ECT pin 7 to the ECT sensor connector on the engine. You should see less than 1 ohm. Do the same for the ACT pin 25 and the ACT sensor connector on the engine. Again, you should see less than 1 ohm.
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 14, 2005
#8
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #8
don't you love all my questions?

And if I don't see less than 1 ohm?
If it's bad, would I see NO ohms, or more than 1?
I would assume the car's battery would have to be connected to test this? It appeared to me that I had to remove the computer ground strap to pull the computer from the kick panel, and I thought doing that would ground out the computer.
So what should I do? Disconnect the battery, then the ground strap, remove the computer, re-connect the ground strap, then reconnect the battery, then re-test?

Again, thanks for the help
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 14, 2005
#9
  • Nov 14, 2005
  • #9
Anything 1 ohm or less is good. More than 1 ohm but less than 100 ohms means some dirty connections. More than 100 ohms is a wiring problem that needs further investigation.

Simply disconnect the computer wiring connector from the computer. You don't have to do anything with the battery or grounds. The secondary ground (ground for the computer case) should be long enough to give enough slack to move the computer connector.

If you need help with basic automotive electrical troubleshooting, this is the place to start. See http://www.autozone.com/servlet/UiB..._us/0900823d/80/1d/d8/76/0900823d801dd876.jsp and carefully study ALL the information under the Heading Chassis Electrical, Basic Electricity – Understanding & Troubleshooting.
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 16, 2005
#10
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #10
OK Jrichker, or anone else who knows/cares, I checked the ohms between pins 7 and 25 and their sensors, and got .3-.4 for both.
So far so good.
Then I checked continuity between both and it beeped.
Also good.
Then I checked the voltage for each sensor connector, KOEO, and got roughly 4.5 for the ACT and the ECT.
Is this correct? If not, where I go next?
Thanks again
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 16, 2005
#11
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #11
Reconnect everything and get the engine running. Then use some safety pins to probe the ACT & ECT from the back of the connector. Use the black lead of the DVM on the black/white wire and the red lead of the DVM on the other wire.

If the outside air temp is below 50 degrees F, the ACT may not read correctly.

Make sure the engine is up to operating temp prior to measuring the ECT. If the coolant temp is below 50 degrees F, the ECT may not read correctly.

You should see some voltages compatible with this table:

68 degrees F = 3.02 v
86 degrees F = 2.62 v
104 degrees F = 2.16 v
122 degrees F = 1.72 v
140 degrees F = 1.35 v
158 degrees F = 1.04 v
176 degrees F = .80 v
194 degrees F = .61

The above values are +/-20%
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 16, 2005
#12
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #12
OK, so get the enigine up to temp., then SHUT IT OFF(?) to do the test??
Right now, I tried probing from the back, and got absolutely NO readings? So get it up to temp, kill it, and then measure, or measure while it's running?
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 16, 2005
#13
  • Nov 16, 2005
  • #13
OK, I was able to pull volts once the engine was up to temp. It was .9 @ 180ish on my Sunpro, which could be give or take a few degrees.

SO, If my ohms check out, my volts @ the connector(unplugged) read 4.6 KOEO, and my volts, sensor plugged in, read .9, why am I getting a code for the ECT? I did recently replace it, could it just be bad?
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 17, 2005
#14
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #14
somebody needs to make a smilie for "bump".


Oh yeah, and "bump".
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 17, 2005
#15
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #15
jaymac said:
OK, I was able to pull volts once the engine was up to temp. It was .9 @ 180ish on my Sunpro, which could be give or take a few degrees.

SO, If my ohms check out, my volts @ the connector(unplugged) read 4.6 KOEO, and my volts, sensor plugged in, read .9, why am I getting a code for the ECT? I did recently replace it, could it just be bad?
Click to expand...

Warm the engine up & unplug the wiring connector from the sensor. Carefully open up the radiator cap. Use a cooking thermometer to measure the coolant temp. Then check the sensor resistance against the following table:

Ohms measures at the computer with the computer disconnected, or at the sensor with the sensor disconnected.
50 degrees F = 58.75 K ohms
68 degrees F = 37.30 K ohms
86 degrees F = 27.27 K ohms
104 degrees F = 16.15 K ohms
122 degrees F = 10.97 K ohms
140 degrees F = 7.60 K ohms
158 degrees F = 5.37 K ohms
176 degrees F = 3.84 K ohms
194 degrees F = 2.80 K ohms
 
J

J90GT

New Member
Sep 15, 2005
73
0
0
Nov 17, 2005
#16
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #16
hmmm seems like alot of work. Why dont you just find a new/good used fuel injector harness?
 

jaymac

New Member
Feb 18, 2004
995
0
0
Northern Mass
Nov 17, 2005
#17
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #17
so am I measuring using the prongs on the sensor itself, or on the plug?
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 17, 2005
#18
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #18
jaymac said:
so am I measuring using the prongs on the sensor itself, or on the plug?
Click to expand...
The sensor itself. The resistance values should be the same as the chart +/- 20%


The other approach is more work, but may prove to be more useful, since it includes the wiring resistance. Just make sure you know how to read your meter, since some of them autorange and it can be misleading if you don't pay close attention.

Make sure the sensor is connected to the wiring harness. With the engine warm, disconnect the computer connector. Measure the resistance between pins 7 & 46. The resistance values should be the same as the chart +/- 20%

Either method is good, the last method is the best.
 
9

95cobradude

Banned
Apr 1, 2005
194
0
0
long island, ny
Nov 17, 2005
#19
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #19
before u go through any of that u can have somebody hook up a scan tool to the car and see if u get a coolant temp reading on the scanner. if there is a reading then the computer and the sensor is doing its job.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Nov 17, 2005
#20
  • Nov 17, 2005
  • #20
95cobradude said:
before u go through any of that u can have somebody hook up a scan tool to the car and see if u get a coolant temp reading on the scanner. if there is a reading then the computer and the sensor is doing its job.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, the output from the computer is rather primitive and you don't get info like that from an OBDI computer. If you have a Tweecer or Anderson PMS, you might be able to get that information.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Electrical problems with passenger side downstream o2 sensor
  • Lexiii12
  • Yesterday at 7:02 PM
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
27
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Yesterday at 7:02 PM
Lexiii12
L
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
969
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
Resolved Wiring electric fan
  • cbac89
  • Aug 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
129
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 30, 2026
cbac89
Resolved 93 Mustang 5.0 - Cranks but does not start
  • dan50
  • Jul 18, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
318
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 18, 2026
dan50
G
2006 Mustang GT o2 Sensor Wiring Issue Car Bogging/Choking
  • GCantero93
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
1K
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 6, 2025
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?