• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

hows a 5.0 stack up against a supra TT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bad92GT
  • Start date Start date Apr 7, 2006
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Apr 7, 2006
#1
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #1
this isnt a stock for stock situation.. kid talking trash how he will rip my car to shreds with a supra TT thats hes going to buy.. by that time though, either me or mustangjoe87 will have found the anti-supra solution.. just wondering what yall think about those cars.. and how much power do we really need to beat its face in
 
8

89white50

Member
Nov 16, 2004
440
1
18
central MA
Apr 7, 2006
#2
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #2
tell him until he actually buys the car to stfu...then you dont have much to worry about, since we can all beat a city bus on a tricycle.
 

Ozz

I think I have a problem here.
Founding Member
Jul 27, 2001
3,514
66
109
Canton, MI
Apr 7, 2006
#3
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #3
It's one thing to say "when I get this put on" or "when my car is running", but I'd really laugh at anyone talking about a car they don't even have yet!

I don't know much about Supras but I do see that they're picked on a lot for being nowhere near as fast as their power would suggest.
 

lxwants12's

New Member
Sep 22, 2004
506
0
0
Apr 7, 2006
#4
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #4
ok stock supras arent that fast especially if your doing a 1/4 mile run...but hes not talking about stock..wether the other guy gets it or not thechevyeater still wants to know...and i linked a few clips that will prove to you what a supra can do and that modded supras are more common then stock supras...and my heart belongs to the 5 oh..but i can always admist to a fast car....just like i can admit an 05 gto...c6 zo6...some ls1's...are fast i will admit that a TT supra is nothing to laugh at....at all
 

Kdubslugga

Active Member
Jun 7, 2003
1,515
3
38
Akron, OH
Apr 7, 2006
#5
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #5
A Supra and Mustang are 2 different cars. The Supra Sucks plain and simple and the track, ive seen guys with Supras trapping 118 and running low 13's in the quarter. They are highway queens, from a stop they are dogs. I love the looks of them and the top end power but for me its all about the 0 to 1320ft. Ive yet to race one so i cant talk to much smack
 
B

black92gt

New Member
Aug 7, 2001
64
0
0
PA
Apr 7, 2006
#6
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #6
Stock they are pretty weak, my 91 Mistubishi Eclipse GSX ran with a stock one, I was like $30000 car to $4000, that sucks man.
 

brian15

New Member
Oct 16, 2003
81
0
0
Apr 7, 2006
#7
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #7
ive personally ran one with my car .... which is good for 12.40's

this was a lightly modded supra with free mods and an exhaust..

he had drag radials and from a stop would get out on me a car and it would stay like that till we let off ...

any kind of moving roll all the way to 60ft i would just walk slowly away .

yet at the track his car had been 11.69 @ 116 it was the only supra i have ever seen run correct mph for its et ....
 
E

everynameistake

New Member
Nov 22, 2004
36
0
0
Apr 7, 2006
#8
  • Apr 7, 2006
  • #8
yeah i have herd about low 13s stock. i have not raced any. but would not expect a close to stock fox to win.

isnt there two gen's. i think so at least. what one is he getting
 
9

9 Deuce GT

Member
Dec 10, 2003
550
1
16
Geneva, NY
Apr 8, 2006
#9
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #9
The older ones ('86 1/2 - '92) are only single Turbo, around 240ish hp, though there are a few models with more HP. A modded FOX would own this model. The '93 - ? models are the bad ass years. With a few easy mods can make around 500HP. But as said, are high RPM killers. Take him from a dead stop and only race to 1/4 mile and you should be okay depending on his setup.

On a side note; should a, could a, would a....

Untill he gets the car, just punch him in the face for being a douche bag.
 

1988WHTGT

Member
Mar 31, 2005
270
0
17
Guyton, GA
Apr 8, 2006
#10
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #10
Ha, as I've always heard, "Supra with 500hp to 1200hp = 12-13 second car"
 

legalize420

Active Member
May 21, 2005
1,541
1
37
South Florida
Apr 8, 2006
#11
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #11
the modded ones by me trap 150's in the 9's
 
B

BaXTeR3221

Member
Jan 12, 2004
917
0
16
Orange County, NY
Apr 8, 2006
#12
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #12
I think you guys underestimate the car. I think stock, it would be on par with a mildy modded 5.0. If he has a few good mods, maybe turbo back and some good tires, i can't see the 5.0 winning unless the supra kid can't drive.
 

Swarzkopf

Member
Sep 23, 2004
973
0
16
Pittsburgh
Apr 8, 2006
#13
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #13
Anyone who says that the Supra "sucks" is a ****ing idiot.

The 93+ TT models can and DO run 13s stock. They will tear up any year 5.0 stock to stock easily.

It is REAL easy to get one into the 12s- tires that grip and upped boost.

The STOCK Supra block is good for 1200+ hp as evidenced by a local kid with a 1600hp, stock block Supra...

Supras ARE known for big HP cars with suck ass ETs- due to the fact that lots of dudes take 93+ TT models, rip of the twins and add a huge single turbo and put down 900hp...without realizing that the LONG spool up time needed for that monster turbo has effectively destroyed their chance for a good ET.
 

S&B

I hate my CT. :(
10 Year Member
Dec 18, 2005
1,634
695
204
Cheesehead
Apr 8, 2006
#14
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #14
this is why im gonna get an SRT-4 then ill be able to smoke all you guys
 
M

ms93gt

New Member
Oct 15, 2004
239
0
0
Bayville, NJ
Apr 8, 2006
#15
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #15
http://www.bolt.com/417supra/video/565566?cn=STREAM_417supra_video_large_PAGE1
 

Woodrow

Founding Member
May 19, 2002
183
0
0
Atlanta/Auburn
Apr 8, 2006
#16
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #16


Nuff said
 

Attachments

  • untitled250.webp
    39.2 KB · Views: 126

bdazzgt

I had to jerk off the cable to get it to stop.
Dec 27, 2005
328
0
16
Springfield MO
Apr 8, 2006
#17
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #17

someone on this site made this and it makes a damn good point....
 

Attachments

  • Dyno-Queen.webp
    49.5 KB · Views: 182

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Apr 8, 2006
#18
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #18
In the 1/4 mile expect a stock 93-98 TT Supra to run mid-low 13's......maybe high 13's with a crappy driver. They trap around 105 mph.
 

Bad92GT

The 5 Minute Plan Man
Jun 10, 2004
492
0
0
SC
Apr 8, 2006
#19
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #19
well he sucks at driving and has no idea what hes doing.. so i say he runs 14's lol most likely if he happens to get it.. then he will fugg something up on it and be screwed
 

QuickCapri83

New Member
Sep 5, 2004
80
0
0
North East, PA
Apr 8, 2006
#20
  • Apr 8, 2006
  • #20
Kdubslugga said:
A Supra and Mustang are 2 different cars. The Supra Sucks plain and simple and the track, ive seen guys with Supras trapping 118 and running low 13's in the quarter. They are highway queens, from a stop they are dogs. I love the looks of them and the top end power but for me its all about the 0 to 1320ft. Ive yet to race one so i cant talk to much smack
Click to expand...

Exactly. Supra's from a roll can, or may do damage, but, off the line, from my personal experience at our local track, they suck. And again, they're two different cars, and, to be honest, it sounds like a guy on an ego trip just jealous/envyous of your car. Tell him to get a life, that's what I do. I dont even waste my gas on people like that. I mean....think about it, a guy is planning on buying a nice car, which they are, honestly, and the first thought he has is to beat the piss out of it trying to beat someone so he feels good about himself, or his investment or both I dunno. Ignore people like that, laugh at them, give'em some pipes lette'm know what's good, nothing like a stang, any year I dont care. Mustang>all, faster or not I simply never cared.
:SNSign:
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
SN Mustang Magnum T56 swap
  • revhead347
  • May 24, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
15
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 28, 2026
GearHeadGuy
  • Locked
“Doing stuff the wrong way for the right reasons”: A related stupid story.
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Apr 26, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 27, 2020
a91what
89 (and prior) convertible sidewall speakers.
  • gearhead77
  • May 18, 2020
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
2
Views
5K
Mustang Sound & Shine All Aug 30, 2025
gearhead77
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?