• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

I know this is a dumb question (5.0 engines)

  • Thread starter Thread starter MaxTheHooker
  • Start date Start date May 8, 2008
M

MaxTheHooker

New Member
Jan 15, 2008
36
1
0
May 8, 2008
#1
  • May 8, 2008
  • #1
But what difference is there between an 87-93 5.0 and a 94-95 5.0 engine? visibly? how would i be able to tell, exactly? where are the numbers located on the block so i can check them out? is there anything i could look for visibly that would differentiate? i'm simply not familiar with the 94 95 5.0's.
 
G

GT89Mustang

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
0
0
0
Monmouth County, NJ
May 8, 2008
#2
  • May 8, 2008
  • #2
Biggest visible differance on stock 94-95 is the elbow on the throttle body. Then again it someone swaps it out to a fox tb thats shot. Ill let someone else respond on the casting number part.
 
M

MaxTheHooker

New Member
Jan 15, 2008
36
1
0
May 8, 2008
#3
  • May 8, 2008
  • #3
well the reason why i ask is because apparently there is not a direct swap between a 94-95 t5 and a 79-93 t5 because the input shafts on the 94-95 was longer or something....
 

BlownFiveLiter

have car, will race....wait, it doesn't run
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
3,133
18
108
Chicagoland
May 8, 2008
#4
  • May 8, 2008
  • #4
The wheelbase is slightly longer on the SN95 models, so the input shaft on the T-5 was increased by 5/8" in order to use the same driveshaft and place the shifter within better reach of the driver. The SN95 shortblock is essentially the same as its Fox counterparts, but starting in 93, Ford switched to hypereutectic pistons.
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
May 8, 2008
#5
  • May 8, 2008
  • #5
MaxTheHooker said:
well the reason why i ask is because apparently there is not a direct swap between a 94-95 t5 and a 79-93 t5 because the input shafts on the 94-95 was longer or something....
Click to expand...

The input shafts are different. You just have to make sure you use th bell housing from a 94-95 trans for a 94-95 T5. You CAN NOT mix and match the two. As long as you have the correct bell for the correct trans, you will be fine.

Also, up untill 90-91 (cant remember) the engines had forged pistons, after that they were hyperutectic.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 8, 2008
#6
  • May 8, 2008
  • #6
Don't think the SN95's had the same valve covers either. Stamped steel vs cast aluminum on the Fox's.
 

SQUEEZE&STROKE

New Member
Jun 24, 2005
0
0
0
SOUTHERN CA
May 8, 2008
#7
  • May 8, 2008
  • #7
Gearbanger 101 said:
Don't think the SN95's had the same valve covers either. Stamped steel vs cast aluminum on the Fox's.
Click to expand...

Truth. The stamped steel covers also have the oil fill in a little different place.


And they are black, not grey.
 
M

MaxTheHooker

New Member
Jan 15, 2008
36
1
0
May 8, 2008
#8
  • May 8, 2008
  • #8
now, how would i be able to identify the bell housing? would the bell housing cooperate with the tranny or would it just not happen? i don't really know how it works... what are the symptoms of a mixed and matched bellhousing/tranny?

it had a borg warner non wc t5 in it before i got to it... it shifted fine... when i put the new tranny in, it became a bitch to shift and to put into gear.. i was told that it sounds like the cable assembly... the shop who installed it blamed the pressure plate, although i sent it to ford racing and ford tested it and said everything was fine... so now i'm trying to hunt down the problem, ya know?
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
May 8, 2008
#9
  • May 8, 2008
  • #9
headers are different, at least there is a port for the egr on the pass side. The intake manifold is casted differently, vc's, the accesories, throttle body, maf, computer, bell housing, trans ( the best t5 in my eyes from a stock stang)

what are the symptoms of a mixed and matched bellhousing/tranny?
Click to expand...

the trans wont bolt up all the way.

alot of crap is different (better) on the sn95 cars..
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
May 8, 2008
#10
  • May 8, 2008
  • #10
slow95gt said:
headers are different, at least there is a port for the egr on the pass side. The intake manifold is casted differently, vc's, the accesories, throttle body, maf, computer, bell housing, trans ( the best t5 in my eyes from a stock stang)



the trans wont bolt up all the way.

alot of crap is different (better) on the sn95 cars..
Click to expand...

+1, the upper intake manifold was shorter than the previous cars' to account for the lower hood line. Not that that affects your transmission issues.
 
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
May 8, 2008
#11
  • May 8, 2008
  • #11
Other differences - Water pump, both front acessory brackets, alternator, smog pump, a/c compressor and power steering pump. The 94 -95 has an electric cooling fan. The hard cooling lines that mount to the lower intake are different. The location of the air temperature sensor is difference. Tge distributor is different. The basic long block is the same.
 
M

MaxTheHooker

New Member
Jan 15, 2008
36
1
0
May 8, 2008
#12
  • May 8, 2008
  • #12
so would it have been possible for a shop to unknowingly install a mixed matched tranny and bellhousing? or would something have clearly been wrong?
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
May 8, 2008
#13
  • May 8, 2008
  • #13
The vin # is on the passenger side by the starter you have to turn the block upside down to see it and you can install a fox trans on a SN95 i've done it on my 95. Or you can also buy the drive shaft spacer i also did that. The WC t-5 is way stronger found in i beleive 85 and up 5.0's. valve covers pistons all acc. T.B and some foxes were S/D not MAS air, also the S/N 95's had diffrent air boxes and bigger T.B and MAF's i think? peace.




john
 

enyawix

Member
Dec 18, 2005
507
0
19
127.0.0.1
May 8, 2008
#14
  • May 8, 2008
  • #14
94-95 had shorter runner intake but bigger mass air
 

fastgtfairlane

New Member
Apr 7, 2006
266
0
0
May 9, 2008
#15
  • May 9, 2008
  • #15
i didnt notice anyone mentioning it but the waterpump on the 94-95 is the easiest way to visually tell the difference. along with the front accessory drive is different too.
 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
May 9, 2008
#16
  • May 9, 2008
  • #16
fastgtfairlane said:
i didnt notice anyone mentioning it but the waterpump on the 94-95 is the easiest way to visually tell the difference. along with the front accessory drive is different too.
Click to expand...

several of us said the accessory's are diffrent.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
May 9, 2008
#17
  • May 9, 2008
  • #17
fastgtfairlane said:
i didnt notice anyone mentioning it but the waterpump on the 94-95 is the easiest way to visually tell the difference. along with the front accessory drive is different too.
Click to expand...
Reading comprehension FTW!!
http://forums.stangnet.com/showpost.php?p=7480414&postcount=11
 

Mr. Rustypwnz

Advanced Member
Jun 1, 2005
1,761
63
69
indianapolis/ valdosta ga
May 9, 2008
#18
  • May 9, 2008
  • #18
check post #9!! lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
Emission problems
  • jls.zmmr
  • Feb 5, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
243
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Feb 7, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
787
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
B
Paint in engine bay questions
  • B0udreaux
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
287
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 27, 2026
AeroCoupe
S
Fuel ‘88 GT Runs Rich Cold — Fixes Itself When I Unplug Sensors (ECT, MAF, O2, etc.)
  • Sufarry
  • Nov 6, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
12
Views
827
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2025
Mustang5L5
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
778
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
spilly
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?