• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Installed Cobra brakes, still can't stop. Going hydroboost

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1slow95
  • Start date Start date Oct 1, 2010
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 1, 2010
#1
  • Oct 1, 2010
  • #1
Bullitt brakes actually, but they're the same thing. Bullitt calipers, Hawk HPS pads, stock replacement 13" rotors, and SS brake lines. It does stop better, but it's not nearly as good as I was expecting. I know a big part of the problem is that I'm only pulling 11-12 in.hg. vacuum at idle. So I just bought a complete hydroboost setup from a 99-04.

Other than the lack of vacuum assist, what could cause poor braking? I bled the system and pretty sure I got all the old fluid flushed out. The pedal is very stiff. I replaced the booster when I had the engine out a few years ago, but the master cylinder is the stock 172k mile piece. The hydroboost setup will replace the mc so if that's the problem then I'm good to go.

The problem is when I mash the brakes, they don't feel like they're grabbing. It doesn't even attempt to lock up the tires(ABS doesn't work BTW, rear speed sensors broke). The brakes in my Jeep feel stronger, even with the new Cobra brakes. The pedal will only go about halfway before it stops, which is why I'm thinking it's a power assist problem.

Here's a couple pics from the swap.


 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 1, 2010
#2
  • Oct 1, 2010
  • #2
I had similiar problems. I think you're dead on with the vacuum. I was only pulling 9.5" on mine. You really need about 16" of vacuum for the brake booster to work properly. I ended up going manual brakes. It was a bad idea, and only makes it mildly easier to stop. I think you are on the right track with the hydroboost.

Kurt
 
W

wytstang

Mustang Master
Mar 14, 2004
4,988
4
78
Summerville,SC missing South Fl. weather :(
Oct 1, 2010
#3
  • Oct 1, 2010
  • #3
but the master cylinder is the stock 172k mile piece.
Click to expand...
Their is your problem, you need the cobra mc (15/16 bore vs. the gt 1 1/16 bore) for the cobra brakes to work properly. That's exactly the same reason why you are experiencing the stiff brake pedal. Buy these adapter line from MM Master Cylinder Adapter, 94-95 Cobra master cylinder, 94-95 with Stock Proportining Valve [MMBAK-7] : Maximum Motorsports, the Latemodel Mustang Performance Suspension Leader! and then the correct MC and your braking problems are done.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 2, 2010
#4
  • Oct 2, 2010
  • #4
wytstang said:
Their is your problem, you need the cobra mc (15/16 bore vs. the gt 1 1/16 bore) for the cobra brakes to work properly. That's exactly the same reason why you are experiencing the stiff brake pedal. Buy these adapter line from MM Master Cylinder Adapter, 94-95 Cobra master cylinder, 94-95 with Stock Proportining Valve [MMBAK-7] : Maximum Motorsports, the Latemodel Mustang Performance Suspension Leader! and then the correct MC and your braking problems are done.
Click to expand...

I know the stock MC is why the pedal is hard, but wouldn't the larger bore MC equal more pressure? Basically, the stock MC has the same braking power at half pedal as the Cobra MC at 3/4 pedal?

The hydroboost setup comes with a MC from a 99-04 GT, which is the same as the Cobra MC.
 

sixt9coug

Member
Sep 30, 2009
222
3
19
Norwalk SoCal
Oct 2, 2010
#5
  • Oct 2, 2010
  • #5
Smaller bore will equal more pressure
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 2, 2010
#6
  • Oct 2, 2010
  • #6
Unfortunately there is a lot of rumors out there about GT's upgrading to Cobra front brakes. I had a VERY long email string with a tech at MM....


putting Cobra front brakes on a GT with stock rear brakes makes the car perform WORSE than the GT brakes itself.



This coming from the place we all respect for their parts and service. If i would have known that, i would have just waited and bought an aftermarket set up.
 

Adam95GT

New Member
Aug 14, 2006
2,564
3
0
Burlington, NJ
Oct 2, 2010
#7
  • Oct 2, 2010
  • #7
nmcgrawj said:
Unfortunately there is a lot of rumors out there about GT's upgrading to Cobra front brakes. I had a VERY long email string with a tech at MM....


putting Cobra front brakes on a GT with stock rear brakes makes the car perform WORSE than the GT brakes itself.



This coming from the place we all respect for their parts and service. If i would have known that, i would have just waited and bought an aftermarket set up.
Click to expand...

Exactly why i kept my stock brakes...
 

Dino Dino Bambino

15 Year Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,672
89
79
Cyprus
Oct 3, 2010
#8
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #8
nmcgrawj said:
Unfortunately there is a lot of rumors out there about GT's upgrading to Cobra front brakes. I had a VERY long email string with a tech at MM....

putting Cobra front brakes on a GT with stock rear brakes makes the car perform WORSE than the GT brakes itself.
Click to expand...

I swapped the front brakes from a '98 Cobra onto my GT (kept the stock MC) and they perform much BETTER than the stock GT front brakes. Night and day difference!
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 3, 2010
#9
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #9
Stock brakes are aweful.

Kurt
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 3, 2010
#10
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #10
nmcgrawj said:
Unfortunately there is a lot of rumors out there about GT's upgrading to Cobra front brakes. I had a VERY long email string with a tech at MM....


putting Cobra front brakes on a GT with stock rear brakes makes the car perform WORSE than the GT brakes itself.



This coming from the place we all respect for their parts and service. If i would have known that, i would have just waited and bought an aftermarket set up.
Click to expand...

I thought the rear calipers were the same between the GT and Cobra, and the Cobra just has a larger vented disc?

I never said my brakes were worse than stock. They're definitely better, just not as good as I was expecting. My stock brakes were almost worthless, they actually scared me a couple times.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Oct 3, 2010
#11
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #11
1slow95 said:
I know the stock MC is why the pedal is hard, but wouldn't the larger bore MC equal more pressure? Basically, the stock MC has the same braking power at half pedal as the Cobra MC at 3/4 pedal?
Click to expand...


No, that's not how it works. Bigger is not always better as in this case.

Basically, part of the cobra brake conversion on a 94-95 is that you NEED a new master cylinder. I'm surprised at just how many 94-95 guys don't realize this. Most guys complaining that the Cobra brakes weren't that great on their GT's after the swap never changed the MC out.

Even Ford engineers recognize this which is why the M-2300-Q kit was sold. It's Cobra 13" brakes with the new required master cylinder

Ford Racing M-2300-Q Ford Racing Mustang Brake Upgrade Kits


Reason you need a smaller bore MC here is because, beleive it or not, the cobra calipers are SMALLER than the stock 66 units you replaced.

Here some numbers

2x 66mm calipers = 6842mm^2 of piston area

2x 99-04 Cobra/Mach/Bullitt 40.5mm calipers = 5152mm^2 of piston area.

2x 94-98 Cobra calipers 38mm = 4536mm^2

In terms of hydraulics, that's a HUGE differnce. You are decreasing the slave cylinder (caliper) piston area and making the master and slave closer in ratio. That requires MORE force from your leg to achieve the same braking pressure. In order to compensate mechanically, you need to reduce the size of the MC's bore in order to keep the same appropriate hydraulic ratio.


This is where things get tricky. The 94-95 Cobra 15/16" MC was developed for the 94-98 Cobra calipers which feature 38mm pistons and an even smaller surface area of 4536mm^2. The 99+ casting of the 13" Cobra/Bullitt/Mach caliper has more surface area, so use of the 15/16" MC may result in a soft pedal with a long travel.

The 94-95 GT MC is 1 1/16".

I basically have the same setup as you do on my Fox Mustang. Mach 1 front calipers, Mach 1 rears. I ran the 94-95 GT MC (because it's what i had at the time) and the brakes SUCKED. I swapped to a smaller 1993 Cobra MC 1" bore (no brake lines need to be changed...direct plug in) and the braking was MUCH better. The 15/16" MC is ideal for the 94-98 Calipers, but i went with the 1" bore because the 99-04 versions have more piston surface area. I like the pedal feel with the 1", some guys on the fox boards like that setup with the 15/16" MC instead.

To swap in a 94-95 Cobra 15/16" MC, you will need a $20 brake line adapter kit from maximum motorsports. MMBAK-7

Master Cylinder Adapter, 94-95 Cobra master cylinder, 94-95 with Stock Proportining Valve [MMBAK-7] : Maximum Motorsports, the Latemodel Mustang Performance Suspension Leader!

The 1993 Cobra 1" MC is a direct swap in with no line changes needed.

I'm not telling you which MC you should go with, but just stating that the MC NEEDS to be changed when installing 13" brakes on a 94-95 GT. Without it, you won't be able to put as much hydraulic force into the calipers and then what's the point of the upgrade?

Hydroboost does offer way more assist than vacuum brakes, but you'll need to swap the booster, MC, run new lines and run the power steering hoses, etc. The gt master cylinder is 1 1/16, but the cobra and mach use the same size in hydroboost. A master cylinder swap is MUCH easier. Yoir vacuum numbers are idle are not that critical as overall vacuum at cruise. If you can pull good vacuum during cruise, it should build up even stored vacuum for several stops and your brakes should work fine.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 3, 2010
#12
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #12
I've actually heard of, and it's been discussed here before, of people putting Cobra brakes on with their stock master cylinder, and it worked ok. The Cobra rear rotors are bigger, but the caliper is the same.

Kurt
 

95BlueStallion

My assy trans to myself
15 Year Member
Feb 22, 2007
5,126
3,091
214
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Oct 3, 2010
#13
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #13
I have Cobra front brakes with stock rears, and it is MUCH better than stock. I kept the stock GT MC also. I like the firm pedal, and have no complaints for $ spent.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 3, 2010
#14
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #14
95BlueStallion said:
I have Cobra front brakes with stock rears, and it is MUCH better than stock. I kept the stock GT MC also. I like the firm pedal, and have no complaints for $ spent.
Click to expand...

So how much shorter is the stopping distance?



Or are we making statements by the "butt meter".
 

MFE92

10 Year Member
Aug 25, 2010
1,094
373
124
Phoenix
Oct 3, 2010
#15
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #15
Look at that last pic. Your pads are barely contacting the rotor enough to wear away part of the surface rust.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 3, 2010
#16
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #16
Using Cobra front brakes with GT rear brakes will increase your stopping distance. In other words, a Mustang equipped with this brake combination will not stop as well as it did from the factory. This is a well-documented and scientifically measured fact.

A large percentage of the cars in question have factory ABS. This deals with the mismatched brake bias fairly well, but not perfectly. If the car doesn't have ABS on it, having the GT brakes on the rear is going to increase the front brake bias about 10%. This will increase stopping distances about 5%. When someone installs the Cobra front brakes on their GT, the car will require less pedal effort for a given deceleration rate. Most people will feel this and say that the car stops "better". However, when actually measure to find out what the minimum stopping distance the car is capable of, it will be about 5% longer. Less brake pedal effort does not mean better braking. Minimum braking distances can only be achieved by having the correct front/rear brake bias. See below for more details.

Jason Jacques
805.544.8748 x 13
Maximum Motorsports, Inc.
street | drag | auto-x | road race
Click to expand...

I think he was referring to the fact that if you slam on the brakes as hard as possible, the wheels will want to lock up causing the stopping distance to be greater. ABS will fight this, thus making it not as bad. But still not making up for it.

I also sent jason another email asking a few more questions, will report back with details.
 

1slow95

Founding Member
May 16, 2002
1,797
3
48
ohio
Oct 3, 2010
#17
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #17
Mustang5L5 said:
I'm not telling you which MC you should go with, but just stating that the MC NEEDS to be changed when installing 13" brakes on a 94-95 GT. Without it, you won't be able to put as much hydraulic force into the calipers and then what's the point of the upgrade?

Hydroboost does offer way more assist than vacuum brakes, but you'll need to swap the booster, MC, run new lines and run the power steering hoses, etc. The gt master cylinder is 1 1/16, but the cobra and mach use the same size in hydroboost. A master cylinder swap is MUCH easier. Yoir vacuum numbers are idle are not that critical as overall vacuum at cruise. If you can pull good vacuum during cruise, it should build up even stored vacuum for several stops and your brakes should work fine.
Click to expand...

Great info. In my searches before buying the brakes I found many people reported the stock MC and Cobra brakes worked fine, and many others that said it was much better with the Cobra MC. I figured I'd try it and buy the MC if I needed it.

I just checked and the hydroboost setup I bought is off an '04 Mach 1 so I'm good to go on the MC. On the vacuum problem, stopping at idle I get one good pump of the brake pedal then power assist starts going away.


MFE, the surface rust is there because I had just washed and waxed the car.
 

nmcgrawj

Advanced Member
Sep 28, 2003
3,651
4
68
Indianapolis, IN
Oct 3, 2010
#18
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #18
Do a detailed install of the hydroboost will ya? Take lots of pics!
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,249
17,934
224
Massachusetts
Oct 3, 2010
#19
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #19
1slow95 said:
. On the vacuum problem, stopping at idle I get one good pump of the brake pedal then power assist starts going away.
Click to expand...



Have you considered manual brakes? You'd need a specially designed kit, like from maximum motorsports which includes a revised brake pedal to alter the pedal ratio. You would need an MC change as well, but much more simplier than hydroboost.

Your choice on how you want to go. I see three options

Swap MC and retain the vacuum booster
swap MC and swap to manual brakes
plumb in the hydroboost.

Your call.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,297
1,641
214
Acworth, GA
Oct 3, 2010
#20
  • Oct 3, 2010
  • #20
I got manual brakes. You actually just drill another hole in the stock brake pedal higher up. I don't recommend it. It really makes the car hard to stop.

Kurt
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
1970 brake issue. Bad booster or?
  • All Stock93
  • May 13, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
713
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Sep 13, 2025
All Stock93
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
153
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Saturday at 8:05 PM
AeroCoupe
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
544
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
F
Trouble Shooting Sudden Shift of AFR at low RPM
  • Farva_84
  • Jun 6, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
485
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 8, 2025
Farva_84
F
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?