• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Intake manifold differences?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mus1994stang
  • Start date Start date Oct 11, 2007
M

mus1994stang

New Member
Aug 17, 2003
89
0
0
Oct 11, 2007
#1
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #1
Does any one have a chart or graph showing the differences in 94-95 intake manifolds. cobra, typhoon, trickflow, etc.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Oct 11, 2007
#2
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #2
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=665335

Item #2.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 11, 2007
#3
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #3
I can tell you from looking at many dyno charts some tendencies or trends
I've seen when looking at different intakes used.

I'll focus my comments to street applications here
and
I'll stick to the most popular choices used

Lets start with TFS & Edelbrock

The difference between them is not all that great but I believe in most
cases the Edel will edge out the TFS by a small margin.

Now ... both of these brands offer a long and mid length runner upper

The longer runner choice of either will offer a bit more low end torque
but
Will peter out sooner in the high end of the power curve

The mid length choices will do just the opposite

Another popular choice is the oem Cobra

Nice low end torque but it falls off pretty quick
however
Some have been able to help its high end with porting

Grady
 

rj95svt

Member
Jan 11, 2007
422
0
16
Hayden, AL
Oct 11, 2007
#4
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #4
Here's the best place to look for intake info IMO!

http://www.tmossporting.com/tabid/3451/Default.aspx
 

Tom95gt

Member
Oct 10, 2007
186
1
19
South Jersey
Oct 11, 2007
#5
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #5
i read a lot of books and the edelbrock performer always seems to come out on top. the holley systemax is supposed to be the highest flowing but you lose a lot of torgue
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 11, 2007
#6
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #6
Tom95gt said:
i read a lot of books and the edelbrock performer always seems to come out on top. the holley systemax is supposed to be the highest flowing but you lose a lot of torgue
Click to expand...

The reason you don't see more Edel intakes is simply because .....
you can run a TFS for less money.

The difference in performance is not all that great

however

Something a lot of peeps don't consider

A lot of the time ... Edels can be run with NO spacer
I did that very thing with my combo

Soooo ... you then gotta ask yourself ...
whats the difference in cost when you add in the spacer

Grady
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
Oct 11, 2007
#7
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #7
Don't you have to replace the stock hood with a taller one when you go with the Edelbrock intake?

If a new hood is required, then considering that cost would be wise.
 

onlyme

Member
May 9, 2003
375
0
17
missouri
Oct 11, 2007
#8
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #8
Ive always been curious about the runner size, runner length, and tbody opening of each intake versus another. Like the Trickflow street intake has a 75mm opening, 15" inch runners and 2.0 x1.2 runner size, where is the trackheat has a 75mm opening, 12" runners and 2.0 x1.2. I never could find the runner size,tbody opening, or length on the holley systemax or other intakes. I know though longer runner intakes produce better torque down low,but fall short in the higher rpms. Shorter runners produce more power at higher rpms, but fall a bit short in torque .I believe runner size has alot to do with it though to,seeing as how well the performer intake performs against others.I'm always open for learning more on performance.
 

Darek78

Member
Oct 6, 2004
116
0
16
Brooklyn
Oct 11, 2007
#9
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #9
Edelbrock performer intake fits just fine under the stock hood even with a 3/8 spacer
i just got one put on a week ago no problems
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Oct 11, 2007
#10
  • Oct 11, 2007
  • #10
Car Nut said:
Don't you have to replace the stock hood with a taller one when you go with the Edelbrock intake?

If a new hood is required, then considering that cost would be wise.
Click to expand...

I run a RPM with the oem hood on my 95GT

It just barely touches the blanket

Grady
 

Car Nut

Founding Member
Jul 6, 2000
1,176
1
37
Snellville, Georgia (Atlanta area)
Oct 12, 2007
#11
  • Oct 12, 2007
  • #11
Thanks Darek78 and Grady on the hood fitment responses. Good to know.
 

StinkinLincoln

Member
Dec 9, 2006
240
0
17
Louisiana
Oct 13, 2007
#12
  • Oct 13, 2007
  • #12
i got the rpm2, it hits my hood a little, its b/c i have to washers under my motor mounts so my shorties clear. it still closes, i just need to cut some of the hood brace by the bolt on the intake.
 
M

mus1994stang

New Member
Aug 17, 2003
89
0
0
Oct 14, 2007
#13
  • Oct 14, 2007
  • #13
how does the bbk compare to the other popular intakes
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Unknown engine tick
  • 94 Daily
  • Oct 31, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
143
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 1, 2025
91AOD5.0LX
Y
BBK SSI Crossover tube
  • yaboity
  • May 17, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
19
Views
620
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 7, 2025
yaboity
Y
E
4.6l auto to 5.4l 6 speed
  • EastanF5
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
158
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jan 22, 2026
EastanF5
E
M
Broken lower intake bolts
  • Mike3
  • Aug 11, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
16
Views
567
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Sep 2, 2025
revhead347
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
481
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?