• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech

Intake Obstruction Remove

  • Thread starter Thread starter rich8566
  • Start date Start date Jun 22, 2005

rich8566

New Member
May 26, 2004
120
0
0
NY
Jun 22, 2005
#1
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #1
I finally got around to removing the hydrocarbon obstruction in the intake. No problems so far. My Gt was an early October build. Any comments?
 
N

newbee90gt

New Member
Aug 24, 2003
32
0
0
Oceanside,Ca
Jun 22, 2005
#2
  • Jun 22, 2005
  • #2
any pics...just curious on what you are talking about and is this only in the GT's?
 

bigcat

start with the upper hole, and if more traction is
May 1, 2005
3,015
1
79
7200 feet
Jun 23, 2005
#3
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #3
heres a link to a thread on page 2: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=555710 theres a pic on there and more information on this topic....
 

rich8566

New Member
May 26, 2004
120
0
0
NY
Jun 23, 2005
#4
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #4
newbee90gt said:
any pics...just curious on what you are talking about and is this only in the GT's?
Click to expand...

I don't have any pics, but if you can imagine a can of Bud cut in half and filled with concrete you'd have a good idea of the size, look, feel and weight of this lovely item. Oh, and the concrete interior has holes like swiss cheese.

Out with that nasty obstruction - in with clean ariflow and more power!
 
D

delurker

New Member
Apr 15, 2005
169
0
0
Jun 23, 2005
#5
  • Jun 23, 2005
  • #5
 

Hatchman

New Member
May 10, 2005
86
1
0
Pensacola
Jun 24, 2005
#6
  • Jun 24, 2005
  • #6
rich8566 said:
I finally got around to removing the hydrocarbon obstruction in the intake. No porblems so far. My Gt was as early October build. Any comments?
Click to expand...
Any comments? October? You should have took it out long ago.
 
B

BlazerLT

New Member
Jun 26, 2004
29
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#7
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #7
You sure it isn't intended for straightening the air flow path for proper MAF sensor readings?
 

AvalancheSVT

10 Year Member
Jun 12, 2005
573
37
49
Jun 26, 2005
#8
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #8
straightening airflow? dude, its air... it goes where you pipe it.
 

frdtch05gt

New Member
Apr 12, 2005
9
0
0
Algonquin, IL
Jun 26, 2005
#9
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #9
I've had mine out for a few months now, no issues, haven't really felt any difference either.
 
B

bashed1

New Member
Jan 1, 2005
9
0
0
Jun 26, 2005
#10
  • Jun 26, 2005
  • #10
The factory quit installing the HC traps about 4/11/05. (Mine was built 4/29; doesn't have one.) Unless they simultaneously changed the flash software (which I don't know if they did or not) when they ceased installing the traps, you shouldn't have any problem if you remove one.
 

rich8566

New Member
May 26, 2004
120
0
0
NY
Jun 27, 2005
#11
  • Jun 27, 2005
  • #11
MakotoS13 said:
straightening airflow? dude, its air... it goes where you pipe it.
Click to expand...

It's not possible that it is straightening the airflow since there is no direct routing of air through the thing. Now, maybe it was designed to have minimal impact on airflow, but it's hard to see how a one pound, half-can of Bud with cement inside does that!
 
F

Ford Tech

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
13
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#12
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #12
carbon trap

If you have the carbon trap, remove it. It was originally designed to catch fuel vapors escaping from the intake after the engine was shut off when hot. The vapors would be drawn back into the engine when restarted and burned. Ford deleted this from production as of 4-4-05. The PCM calibration was not changed. My 05 did not have this (built 5-5-05) so I contacted Ford's tech hotline. Got the above info straight from the plant engineer. Hope this helps.
 
0

05 GeeTee

New Member
May 11, 2005
34
0
0
Jun 29, 2005
#13
  • Jun 29, 2005
  • #13
BlazerLT said:
You sure it isn't intended for straightening the air flow path for proper MAF sensor readings?
Click to expand...

The trap is after the MAF and it's a vapor trap not a air straightener.
 
B

BlazerLT

New Member
Jun 26, 2004
29
0
0
Jul 8, 2005
#14
  • Jul 8, 2005
  • #14
Ah, ok, because on some of the GM MAF's, they have a screen on the upstream side to straighten the airflow path so the MAF doesn't take a reading from a turbulent air mass passing through.

But seeing it is after the MAF, who cares right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Differential noise over bumps
  • sharkrat
  • Apr 10, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
110
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Apr 10, 2026
sharkrat
S
E
Chasing Vacuum leak 99 GT
  • EBNS_2005
  • May 2, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
106
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 3, 2026
X-cam34
X
F
Anyone here identify this intake?
  • fratzke
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
269
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 23, 2026
fratzke
F
Vacuum line question?
  • Mustang Momma
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
135
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
830
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?