• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

intakes. whats the best?

  • Thread starter Thread starter schwbs5.0
  • Start date Start date Sep 29, 2004
S

schwbs5.0

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
41
0
0
Sep 29, 2004
#1
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #1
i have a 1988 5.0 i want to upgrade my upper and lower what would be the best one to get in your opion. i have Gt-40 heads and e 303 cam,full exhaust and all your other bolt ons.. just give me some advice..what would you go with..
 

houstonstangguy

Founding Member
Mar 16, 2002
979
0
0
Houston, Texas
Sep 29, 2004
#2
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #2
id probably go with the trick flow street heat but the cobra or gt40 would also be good for you. all are very close in comparison.

when i had a setup like yours i used the edelbrock performer intake so that would also be good. your choice
 

omarECD

New Member
Nov 24, 2002
44
0
0
Philadelphia, PA
Sep 29, 2004
#3
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #3
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/Detailed/574.shtml
 
9

91notchgt

New Member
Sep 29, 2004
10
0
0
Wading River NY
Sep 29, 2004
#4
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #4
it all depends on your spending limit
 
S

schwbs5.0

New Member
Jul 22, 2004
41
0
0
Sep 29, 2004
#5
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #5
425 bucks would be around my limit
 

CRASH7772

Member
Apr 27, 2003
401
1
16
NH
Sep 29, 2004
#6
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #6
I would vote for the Street Heat from Trick Flow if going new, best bang for buck IMO. If you can find a used intake.....shop around. I got my Street Heat for $320 shipped. If you can find a Explorer intake for cheap that would work and you could have some funds for other things like TB/EGR to compliment the intake (if you don't have on already). The Eldelbrock is pretty good as well but usually a little more pricey.
 

BullittStangV8

Founding Member
Oct 5, 2002
1,104
0
36
NJ
Sep 29, 2004
#7
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #7
whats your opinions on the edelbrock RPM performer?
Mike
 
O

onefastlx

New Member
Sep 9, 2004
42
0
0
Sep 29, 2004
#8
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #8
TFS street heat without a doubt.I take it the car has been converted to MAF?? make sure you get a bigger diameter MAF sensor as well bro as the stock one really chokes off the inlet tract.
 

90mustangGT

I felt sorry for girls because
Founding Member
Jan 15, 2002
2,773
17
89
Dallas, GA
Sep 29, 2004
#9
  • Sep 29, 2004
  • #9
My vote would be for either the Performer or if you plan to keep on modding to a higher level, the Performer RPM by Edelbrock. It is easily portable but simple. One thing that made me get it what it has such even flow numbers between the ports. I recomend this intake because of personal experience and AFR, and FTI recomend them, and that should tell you.

A buddy of mine that I got the fuel system from was parting out his car and had a TFS Street, and maby I should have swapped them for a run or two to see if I gained any. I doubted it though. The ports are larger than the Edelbrocks, but I didn't like there was this big chunk of metal blocking air flow right after the TB. I've heard about low end tq issues with this intake. I would have swapped intakes if I had time, but it isn't as simple and trying on a pair of pants.
 
B

Biggeley

New Member
Mar 4, 2003
136
0
0
Sep 30, 2004
#10
  • Sep 30, 2004
  • #10
schwbs5.0

Hey schwbs5.0, I got a perfect condition used Street Heat you can have for $320 shipped.
 

millhouse

Founding Member
May 14, 2002
1,985
0
46
Simpsonville, SC
Sep 30, 2004
#11
  • Sep 30, 2004
  • #11
With that spending limit, you have plenty of choices. You will however want to upgrade your t.b. and get a larger egr plate to match.

Your best bet with mild mods would be a performer or a cobra/explorer. They flow well enough to support over 400 h/p...yet they allow you to retain your low end torque. I personally got a performer...as it was a deal I couldnt resist.

Yet another option would be to get your stocker ported by t-moss. He does a mean porting job on the stock intake for a reasonable price. It definatley gives you a sleeper effect when you pop your engine.

I have a used, low mileage mountaineer engine which is the same as the explorer. You can do a search on them to learn more. I'm selling it for less than half of your limit which would leave plenty of room for the other needed supporting mods.

Pm me if your interested.
 

mustangsquared

Founding Member
Jun 8, 2002
828
1
16
new bern nc
Sep 30, 2004
#12
  • Sep 30, 2004
  • #12
The trick flow street heat out flows the cobra...I would get it...in BLACK... Just my 2cents. Or wait for the reviews of the new BBK SSI...should be out in the next issue of MMFF...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

F
Engine 1988 Foxbody idle issues
  • fernandosgarage55
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
573
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 30, 2026
AeroCoupe
Engine Catch Can or not?
  • R82148V
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
9
Views
355
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 6, 2026
ctandc
C
B
Engine 95 mustang Gt
  • Bett23
  • May 29, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
4
Views
313
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 29, 2025
General karthief
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
28
Views
605
Digital Self-tuning Forum Jun 19, 2026
spencergt66
S
Engine 87 NA - Tune or no Tune needed?
  • R82148V
  • Sep 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
359
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 17, 2025
R82148V
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?