• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Is it true???

  • Thread starter Thread starter everynameistake
  • Start date Start date Nov 22, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
A

alan518

Banned
Nov 17, 2004
77
0
0
Nov 23, 2004
#21
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #21
excellent spelling,, you need to go back to school

everynameistake said:
is it true that the new stangs have a soild axil no possy just stright, just herd that and thought it was a roomer. thanks
Click to expand...
your spelling is sooooooooooooooooo bad
 

TR03Mach1

Member
May 31, 2002
450
0
16
New Castle, Delaware USA
Nov 23, 2004
#22
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #22
AzSnake said:
Um no, right back at you
Do a search on Positraction....Nearly EVERY locker company and 3rd member company out there has "positraction" listed for every type of vehicle they make for. If it was what GM named their unit it would be a trademark and would not be allowed to be used in the context the way nearly every company out there uses it.
Positraction is not a GM name, it's not owned by GM, it was never trademarked by GM.

Now GM used it heavily and probably more than other but it's not a GM trademark.
Click to expand...
Umm, actually, SVTpilot is kinda sorta almost right. It's not GM's trademark, but it IS Eaton's. Eaton positraction units were used almost exclusively on GM products throughout the 60's and 70's, which is why the name "positraction" is so closely associated with GM products. See below from the Eaton web site.

"The Eaton Posi Limited Slip Differential was first introduced in 1961 on a 1/2 ton GM Pickup Truck. It gained notoriety during the 60's/70's muscle car era. Today, we offer the Eaton Posi Limited Slip Differential for older/newer automobiles and light trucks in the aftermarket."
 
S

scottie1113

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
1,398
0
0
Grass Valley CA
Nov 23, 2004
#23
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #23
It's not a roomer. It's a pretty small car with a small back seat.
 

wild stray

New Member
Nov 6, 2004
4
0
0
L.A., Ca.
Nov 23, 2004
#24
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #24
Cook89Notch said:
Oh yeh! i gotts a 85 mostang with a stick reer end that is eqiupid form the factery with a possy-traklok sergripe axil so thate shold shutt you peple upp!
Click to expand...
I believe it! I read it on the internet!
 

Svtpilot

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
944
59
59
Long Island, NY
Nov 23, 2004
#25
  • Nov 23, 2004
  • #25
AzSnake said:
Um no, right back at you
Do a search on Positraction....Nearly EVERY locker company and 3rd member company out there has "positraction" listed for every type of vehicle they make for. If it was what GM named their unit it would be a trademark and would not be allowed to be used in the context the way nearly every company out there uses it.
Positraction is not a GM name, it's not owned by GM, it was never trademarked by GM.

Now GM used it heavily and probably more than other but it's not a GM trademark.
Click to expand...

It may not be a GM trade mark, I didn't say it was. But what I did say is that the term "Posi" is not a generic term for a limited slip diff, and that Mustangs do not have "Posi" rears.
You show me any Ford (or Chrysler) factory literature that describes a limited slip diff as a Posi or a Posi-traction rear and I will buy you a beer.
 
S

Stangston

Member
Dec 28, 2003
144
0
16
Nov 24, 2004
#26
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #26
i herd a roomer that the mock 1 has a possy.
 

Ron9

New Member
Oct 9, 2004
28
0
0
Nov 24, 2004
#27
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #27
Back in the early 60s we called limited slip > positraction - no matter what brand the car was.

I have a hunch this is a "Harley" deal - by that I mean - Ape Hangers became a Harley word - Harley STOLE the word from the general public. They then started suing everyone for using "their word(s)". Harley just flat did not invent half the words it uses these days. I fully expect them to register the word "tumbleweed" some day (just a sec I need to go barf at Harley inventing words and phrases that had/have been around for years) lol.

Positraction is positraction no matter what the marking hype says and who sues who for using the wording lol.

I had a 65 but my buddies 64 Plymouth came straight from the factory with the "clicking" read end. Everyone called it positraction. It may not have been written in his owners manual but that is what we all called it.
 

AzSnake

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
825
0
0
Oro Valley, Arizona
Nov 24, 2004
#28
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #28
Ron9 said:
Back in the early 60s we called limited slip > positraction - no matter what brand the car was.

I have a hunch this is a "Harley" deal - by that I mean - Ape Hangers became a Harley word - Harley STOLE the word from the general public. They then started suing everyone for using "their word(s)". Harley just flat did not invent half the words it uses these days. I fully expect them to register the word "tumbleweed" some day (just a sec I need to go barf at Harley inventing words and phrases that had/have been around for years) lol.

Positraction is positraction no matter what the marking hype says and who sues who for using the wording lol.

I had a 65 but my buddies 64 Plymouth came straight from the factory with the "clicking" read end. Everyone called it positraction. It may not have been written in his owners manual but that is what we all called it.
Click to expand...
Thank you
 
E

el1976pinto

New Member
Jun 23, 2004
16
0
0
Nov 24, 2004
#29
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #29
Chevrolet- PosiTraction
Buick- Limited slip
Olds- Anti-Spin
Pontiac- Saf-T-Trac
AMC- Twin Grip
Mopar- Sure Grip
FoMoCo- Traction lok

These are the names the auto makers had for their limited slips back in the origional muscle car era. these terms should be right. Yes, Buick just called em' "Limited slips", and Chevrolet called em' Posi-tractions. Now days all limited slips seem to be called Posi Traction. Hey, at one time the word "computer" actally belonged to a single company.
These are the way I remember, feel free to attack me and make me look like I dont know waht I'm talking about.
 

AzSnake

Founding Member
Nov 12, 2001
825
0
0
Oro Valley, Arizona
Nov 24, 2004
#30
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #30
el1976pinto said:
Chevrolet- PosiTraction
Buick- Limited slip
Olds- Anti-Spin
Pontiac- Saf-T-Trac
AMC- Twin Grip
Mopar- Sure Grip
FoMoCo- Traction lok

These are the names the auto makers had for their limited slips back in the origional muscle car era. these terms should be right. Yes, Buick just called em' "Limited slips", and Chevrolet called em' Posi-tractions. Now days all limited slips seem to be called Posi Traction. Hey, at one time the word "computer" actally belonged to a single company.
These are the way I remember, feel free to attack me and make me look like I dont know waht I'm talking about.
Click to expand...

Not attacking you but look where are the trademarks? If GM or Ford or Chrysler had come up with these terms they would have trademarked them.
 

Svtpilot

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
944
59
59
Long Island, NY
Nov 24, 2004
#31
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #31
AzSnake check , first sentence second paragraph of the link below:
http://www.truckworld.com/How-To-Tech/Lockers-Differentials/4x4Lockers-Diffs.html

In case you still don't belive me here is another, halfway down second paragraph:
http://www.enjoythedrive.com/content/?id=7024
 

silver-gt-vert

Founding Member
Apr 18, 2000
407
0
0
Pembroke Pines, FL
Nov 24, 2004
#32
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #32
Scott_B said:
Well yes they have a solid live rear axle, and no they dont have "possy" they have traction-lok. Chevy has "possy"
Click to expand...

Are you saying Chevy's have a p*ssy?
 

Scott_B

"1 Arm Wonder! "
Founding Member
Oct 27, 1998
4,197
0
66
NS Canada!
Nov 24, 2004
#33
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #33
silver-gt-vert said:
Are you saying Chevy's have a p*ssy?
Click to expand...

I was simply quoting the original post
 

TR03Mach1

Member
May 31, 2002
450
0
16
New Castle, Delaware USA
Nov 24, 2004
#34
  • Nov 24, 2004
  • #34
Here is the final definitive explanation of the "posi" thing. It is a tradmarked name, but not by the car manufacturer, but by the manufacturer of the differential unit, Eaton.

Positraction, or Limited Slip
Limited slip rearends work in exactly the same way, but, they resist this "turning at independant speeds" idea, by installing a set of clutches (or something else that may act like a clutch) on one, or both axles, and "hooking" the axle, or axles, to the ringgear carrier. The clutches are set to slip at a certain torque. By design, as input torque, from your engine, increases, the clutches hold on tighter, in an attempt to keep both axles turning at the same speed, relative to each other. When one wheel has no traction, a limited amount of torque is applied to the opposite axle, hopefully helping enough to get you "unstuck". And the difference between "Posi", "Limited Slip", "Traction LOK", etc? They have all become generic overused terms that basically can be used interchangeably. "Positraction" is a Trademark name, just as "Traction LOK", but have become generic terms, just as "Cresent Wrench", and "Channellocks", although both being specific brands, have become generic terms. ("CresentWrench" is a particular brand of adjustable wrench, and "Channellock" is a particular brand of adjustable slipjoint pliers). Another example is the term "COKE", which many people use as a generic term meaning Cola, even though "COKE" is a particular brand of Cola.
 
E

el1976pinto

New Member
Jun 23, 2004
16
0
0
Nov 28, 2004
#35
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #35
Hey man, I don't know. I was a rabbid Muscle Car fanatic when I was a kid (like, I had a problem) and I just know that these were the terms the companies used. For instance, in their advertising, thats what a "limited slip" was called. I know these terms don't fly today, and different companies have copyrights or whatever, but this was the past. And you cant change the past.
 
7

77M2C2

New Member
Nov 16, 2004
20
0
0
Wantagh Long Island New York
Nov 28, 2004
#36
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #36
I'll give a go at the original concern of the topic question which I believe is if...you mash the go pedal to the floor and stand on the brakes a little in an 05 Mustang will it produce a one wheel whimpy burnout or will will it light up both rear skins in a delightful destructive display of new burnt rubber.

Is this what you were trying to ask? Was it?

Dale
 

30AnnivStang

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
853
1
18
Mauldin , SC
Nov 28, 2004
#37
  • Nov 28, 2004
  • #37
77M2C2 said:
I'll give a go at the original concern of the topic question which I believe is if...you mash the go pedal to the floor and stand on the brakes a little in an 05 Mustang will it produce a one wheel whimpy burnout or will will it light up both rear skins in a delightful destructive display of new burnt rubber.

Is this what you were trying to ask? Was it?

Dale
Click to expand...
no, I thought it was about the Mach 1's being female.

Actually , reading the original question, the original idiot, sorry Poster, thought that the new mustang had a spool solid rearend with no differential. That's the dumbest thing i've ever heard.
 
I

IWantMyNewGT

Member
Feb 9, 2004
32
0
6
Nov 29, 2004
#38
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #38
POSI-tively

Yes, and it will work with either a Torqueflite or a Hydra-matic!

watch said:
MOCK 1 ? This message board reminds me of the movie Joe Dirt .Next question will FORD have a Hemi with posi-traction and how does it work?
Click to expand...
 

30AnnivStang

Founding Member
Jul 25, 2001
853
1
18
Mauldin , SC
Nov 29, 2004
#39
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #39
watch said:
MOCK 1 ? This message board reminds me of the movie Joe Dirt .Next question will FORD have a Hemi with posi-traction and how does it work?
Click to expand...


ehmmmm......actually the 4.6 does have a TRUE semi-hemispherical head to my understanding. And the Current Hemi does not. It's all just marketing.

And, i love that movie.
 

RandyB

New Member
Feb 20, 2004
307
0
0
Tx.
Nov 29, 2004
#40
  • Nov 29, 2004
  • #40
Hmmm... Mock1...

Maybe he was taking a shot at the Machs with that comment. I kind of like that. As in the Mach mocking the Cobra it will never be.

/runs and hides from the Mach mob...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
No crank no start 4.6l
  • Alfredosp
  • May 4, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
62
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- May 4, 2026
Alfredosp
A
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
149
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
Thinking of selling my stang.
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Mar 26, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
115
What is it Worth?!?!? Mar 26, 2026
Noobz347
S
New guy- first Stang- I love it !!
  • smid333
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
140
The Welcome Wagon Mar 23, 2026
smid333
S
EV1 harness ends
  • JD1964
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
111
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 29, 2026
JD1964
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?