Yes as long as it is a Solid (96-98 Cobra or equivlant) swaybar, most companys that sell swaybars are solid and just as good, if not a little thicker. So yes a Steeda rear bar is better than stock, basically any bar is better than stockspederman said:Is it worth upgrading the stock REAR anti sway bar?
01BlkGT said:But if you really want to upgrade....I have a 96-98 Cobra rear swaybar I dont use anymore....pm me if you are interested......
With Good LCA's, a stiffer rear swaybar is actually discouraged.spederman said:I was looking at the steeda heavy duty rear anti sway bar. Its $125, which doesnt seem to bad if it makes handling noticably better. Anybody have an aftermarket rear anti sway bar? Did you notice anything?
wms004 said:
If you are drag only, a stronger/larger swaybar should be fine. But in cornering limits, if you have good LCA's, too stiff of a swaybar can cause the rear end to give way without warning, instead of having some flex.spederman said:Seriously? Because i am in the process of ordering some Maximum Motorsport adjustable heavy duty (drag) LCA's. So should I stick to the stock GT rear sway bar?
wms004 said:If you are drag only, a stronger/larger swaybar should be fine. But in cornering limits, if you have good LCA's, too stiff of a swaybar can cause the rear end to give way without warning, instead of having some flex.
that point also follows the front swaybar aswell, because the mustang is built from the factory with understeer, when you upgrade the rear you are balancing out the steer in the car, you just have to tune it right with the sway bar you choosewms004 said:too stiff of a swaybar can cause the rear end to give way without warning, instead of having some flex.
wms004 said:If you are drag only, a stronger/larger swaybar should be fine. But in cornering limits, if you have good LCA's, too stiff of a swaybar can cause the rear end to give way without warning, instead of having some flex.
That's what she saidanything to help out the rear is money well spent
I might be interested. Tried to PM you, your mailbox is too full. Can you PM me with details.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?