• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Is this the same stangnet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter willys1
  • Start date Start date Jan 3, 2004
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 3, 2004
#1
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #1
It looks all different
 

DirtyD916

Active Member
May 25, 2003
804
1
38
Norcal 916
Jan 3, 2004
#2
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #2
I Hate It. I Abo****ly Hate It. Its Too Clean And Spaced Out. Not Enough Color And Contrast. Just Go Back To The Old Way And It'll Be Good.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
Jan 3, 2004
#3
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #3
Change is good
 

5 Liter Mustang

New Member
Aug 17, 2003
119
0
0
Jan 3, 2004
#4
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #4
it'll take getting used to
 
C

ccwilms

New Member
Jun 19, 2003
26
0
0
Virginia
Jan 3, 2004
#5
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #5
Can't search the forums??? What's up??
 

HO93LX302

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2002
715
0
0
Naugatuck,CT
Jan 3, 2004
#6
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #6
Its looks good, but it could use some more color like DirtyD said..
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 3, 2004
#7
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #7
Yea,looks cheaper
 

Black 93 Fox

Active Member
Jun 1, 2003
1,995
0
49
Vancouver,Washington
Jan 3, 2004
#8
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #8
I like it better then the old verison.
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Jan 3, 2004
#9
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #9
this is the evil twin of stangnet. it only comes out when mods go on vacation and then the trolls come out. come on guys......go back to the old setup

-Drew
 

88GTtom

Member
Oct 22, 2003
198
0
17
Woodbridge NJ
Jan 3, 2004
#10
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #10
ya, i looks like some other sights, stangnets old way was different. go back to it, even tho i like the quick reply option, keep that
 

mike keirstead

New Member
Aug 6, 2003
1,121
0
0
ROLLING A JOINT
Jan 3, 2004
#11
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #11
Its alright.....what can we do about it anyway.
 

willys1

Active Member
Dec 2, 2003
1,004
1
36
New Jersey
Jan 3, 2004
#12
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #12
mike keirstead said:
Its alright.....what can we do about it anyway.
Click to expand...
Hi Mike,any new mods?
 

JadeFalcon

Founding Member
Mar 28, 2002
1,924
0
0
Arlington, TX
Jan 3, 2004
#13
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #13
gah, It sure is different isnt it. Looks like table percentages and colors have been changed, other than that I cant really at all say that it is more efficient, except the fact that it is almost identical to our previous version except now we have to find where everything was put.
 
T

Tstang90

Founding Member
Jun 21, 2000
2,380
0
46
Long Island,NY
Jan 3, 2004
#14
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #14
I dont care the spacing takes too long to see the replies. But the quick repy is a nice feature. I like the old style but I guess we have to get used to the new one
 

N8Miller

I need NOS....make it 2 of the big ones
Founding Member
Jul 26, 2000
2,661
0
0
Kingston, PA, USA
Jan 3, 2004
#15
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #15
i like it and i dont. i like the original stangnet i signed up for 3 years ago. and the previous classifieds. but, guys, this is a great site, if you wanna voice your opions, PM your MODS and let them know. Most of them are great people.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Jan 3, 2004
#16
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #16
I like the old way and I am usually a guy for change but not this time

David
 

huskerpower02

Member
Aug 21, 2003
770
0
16
KS
Jan 3, 2004
#17
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #17
ok, so who actually OWNS stangnet.com and who did the change?

-Drew
 

Melvin_91GT

Founding Member
Oct 16, 2001
930
0
0
Atlanta, GA
Jan 3, 2004
#18
  • Jan 3, 2004
  • #18
It does take some getting used to, I'll agree... But, thankfully a couple of other boards I frequent have done this upgrade already. It takes some getting used to, but it is quite nice.
 

JenkinsBS

Founding Member
Apr 16, 2002
1,001
1
39
Washington
Jan 4, 2004
#19
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #19
i say go back to the way it used to be...

its like moving from a nice home youve lived in for 3 or 4 years, in to some shisty appt. complex in the ghettos where your upstairs and downstairs neighbors yell at eachother via the windows by the fire escape... makes you want to move back


b.j.
 

SuperStang83

Founding Member
Mar 21, 2001
1,693
0
49
Boyertown, Pa
Jan 4, 2004
#20
  • Jan 4, 2004
  • #20
You could quick reply a few months ago! This site now looks like all the other boards, but maybe I'll learn to like it!

Jakob
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

E
Serpentine ac bracket differences
  • EspaceF1Fan
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Replies
1
Views
109
2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech Apr 1, 2026
OX1
O
Door glass fastener question
  • limp
  • May 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
191
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 25, 2026
limp
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
216
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
S
Electrical Stumped No Start...
  • sydhawk
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
269
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2025
sydhawk
S
6
2010 V6 Sees differently than GT?
  • 6t9Mach1
  • Mar 31, 2026
  • 2010 - 2014 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
166
2010 - 2014 Specific Tech Apr 1, 2026
6t9Mach1
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?